![]() |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Regardless of what's coming, this is funny 😁: [URL="https://fb.watch/av_klaDNi2/"]https://fb.watch/av_klaDNi2/[/URL]
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[QUOTE=AnonEmouse;1307907]Maybe practically true but not legally correct. i.e. some trademarks (depending on the legal locality they are established) are renewable, they can lapse through lack of use etc. No trademark exists in perpetuity without the owners active involvement, but in this case, it's likely that any dispute we were headed for and avoided, is with a name that's in current trademarked use.
Maybe we could have gone back and found a lapsed one? Ye Olde Warthoges? Ye Scarlet Werwulf?[/QUOTE]The Scarlet Werewolves is my new favorite!! Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=AnonEmouse;1307921]Regardless of what's coming, this is funny 😁: [URL="https://fb.watch/av_klaDNi2/"]https://fb.watch/av_klaDNi2/[/URL][/quote]
hahaha |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
I hope they shock us, and Commanders was just a trick/placeholder, and they announce some bad ass name.
Washington Commanders is sooooo boring. C'mon Washington Waterbucks. [IMG]https://www.animalspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Waterbuck.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Fans are bipolar I swear. On one hand people complain wanted transparency through this process, now people are hoping it's all a smoke screen, lol
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=MTK;1307926]Fans are bipolar I swear. On one hand people complain wanted transparency through this process, now people are hoping it's all a smoke screen, lol[/quote]
I didn't care about transparency or not, I just wanted a cool name, no matter how it happened. Commanders is fine. I don't hate it. It's just a blah name. It's no Waterbucks. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
In a vacuum you could probably say that most names are blah and boring. We're just used to them. In time we'll get used to Commanders too.
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1307923]The Scarlet Werewolves is my new favorite!!
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk[/quote] Werwulf is actually the old English name for wolf, and probably where the Werewolf legend comes from. But yeah, being the Werewolves would be cool, but night games could get messy... |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
cheers to sounding like some usfl re-tread...
hope its redtails at this point or something hog related which it prolly wont be commanders sucks. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Anyone else think that because some of these names have been circulating so widely now, and still a month away from the grand reveal, that they're all red herrings?
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
I just want this shit to be over with.
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=jamf;1307934]I just want this shit to be over with.[/quote]
We haven't had a name for a year and a half and the last three weeks are going to feel like three years! :D |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=MTK;1307928]In a vacuum you could probably say that most names are blah and boring. We're just used to them. [B]In time we'll get used to Commanders too.[/B][/quote]
See: Washington Wizards. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=Ruhskins;1307936]See: Washington Wizards.[/quote]
LOL. A very uninspired choice. They should have gone back to Zephyrs which was the franchise's original name. Before that it was Packers, but that would have gone nowhere fast and for good reason. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=MTK;1307928]In a vacuum you could probably say that most names are blah and boring. We're just used to them. In time we'll get used to Commanders too.[/quote]
Dolphins is the prime example |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.