Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;866336]Gabbert wasn't appealing to me based on the fact that he only threw 16 TD's and 7 picks against the Big 12...Andy Dalton on the other hand, no matter who he played was a high TD low Int consistent guy.[/quote]

Gabbert was a dinker and dunker in college, and a dinker and dunker in the NFL. Accuracy issues

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;866471]The more I hear about him, the more I like him.

13 TD's this season v. 12 Incompletes. Don't know if that was current or sometime mid-season but it's freaking phenomenal. I would be VERY happy with this guy.[/quote]

RG3 is probably my second choice after Luck. I think the kid has a very bright future in the NFL. And the 13 td's v. 12 incompletions thing was very early in the season, probably 3 games in I think, but either way it's very impressive.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=Mattyk;866476]Maybe because this isn't a blog...[/quote]

Why do people keep calling it a blog recently??

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;866481]Why do people keep calling it a blog recently??[/quote]

yeah i called it a blog recently, I think by definition it is. Ive always thought a forum to which encourages sharing of opinions by anyone who wants to participate was a blog...i mean if it is not what is it? you act like by saying "blog" it is derogatory, I've never thought that.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

It's a forum, or message board.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_board]Internet forum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog]Blog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

Just googled whay you were talking about. This kind of speculation does not really seem that out of whack. We are always going to be connected to these kinds of rumors.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=Chico23231;866482]yeah i called it a blog recently, I think by definition it is. Ive always thought a forum to which encourages sharing of opinions by anyone who wants to participate was a blog...i mean if it is not what is it? you act like by saying "blog" it is derogatory, I've never thought that.[/quote]

It's not a blog at all. It's a message board.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=Mattyk;866488]It's a forum, or message board.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_board]Internet forum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog]Blog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url][/quote]

word up on the education. yeah, thought the terms blog, forum, message board were basically synonymous. obviously not, thanks

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=The Goat;866161]Who besides Luck and maybe Barkley are said to be instant starters at the pro level?[/quote]No offense, but the thought that people consider any QB prospect an instant starter at a pro-bowl level is patently absurd.

But there are some good prospects in this class.
I guess you're asking about pro-ready prospects that could start at some point in their rookie year?
You already mentioned Luck and Barkley.
Even though Griff, Weeden come from a spread I think they could start too.
Tannehill could also because of the system familiarity from his college offense.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

RG3 See's the white girls coming up lol Ok JK anyways On the field he's a big time QB waiting to happen

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=30gut;866518]No offense, but the thought that people consider any QB prospect an instant starter at a pro-bowl level is patently absurd.[/quote]

I'm sure you've heard of Cam Newton and Andy Dalton? Luck, Barkley and possibly RGIII could be just as good or better next year.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

Cam Newton is a Freak of nature, Luck is the only QB I'd take over Cam in this draft

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=Chico23231;866482]yeah i called it a blog recently, I think by definition it is. Ive always thought a forum to which encourages sharing of opinions by anyone who wants to participate was a blog...i mean if it is not what is it? you act like by saying "blog" it is derogatory, I've never thought that.[/quote]

I noticed that Chico' but, I know what you meant.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;866528]Cam Newton is a Freak of nature, Luck is the only QB I'd take over Cam in this draft[/quote]

That's a strong statement. Hmmm.

@ diehard

Have u seen cam play this season? Big time deep ball accuracy, obviously runs the ball better than any QB other than Vick and has way better accuracy than most thought. He'll be around for a LONG time