Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The official 2008 draft discussion thread (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=23312)

Beemnseven 04-26-2008 07:50 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Ok that makes zero sense.

BleedBurgundy 04-26-2008 07:51 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Are we planning on going two TE's this year? Or is Cooley moving back to H-back? SS, what were those off the field issues you alluded to earlier regarding Campbell? Gotta wonder what the heck is up with this pick.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 04-26-2008 07:51 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Those who subscribe to the "best player available" philosophy shouldn't complain too much about the Davis pick. I personally think we shouldn't draft anyone at RB or TE, but Davis was projected to go higher.

MonkFan4Life 04-26-2008 07:51 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Sooooooooo are we going to trade this guy or something ?

Big C 04-26-2008 07:52 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
are we converting him back to wide reciever or using more of a 2 te set?

EARTHQUAKE2689 04-26-2008 07:52 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
that is the one position that i thought we would not draft

SKINSnCANES 04-26-2008 07:52 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
[QUOTE=itvnetop;443638]Y'all are sleepin!

This guy is money... y'all just don't know it yet.

Fight On Trojan Skins![/QUOTE]

its supposed to be SKINSnCANES , not SKINSnCONDOMS, heh

just kidding

Beemnseven 04-26-2008 07:52 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
[QUOTE=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;443648]Those who subscribe to the "best player available" philosophy shouldn't complain too much about the Davis pick.[/QUOTE]

I'm not one of those people. We have much bigger needs.

SmootSmack 04-26-2008 07:52 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Fred Davis can play, that's for sure. But did we need him there? We can still get Campbell or Groves easily at 51 and the draft is deep enough at DB that I'm not too upset about not taking one there. But I don't know about passing those up for a TE

Blache must be like "Thanks for hooking me up guys"

bertoskins2 04-26-2008 07:53 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
we will really concentrate on our passing game. fred davis is a beast

XXVI 04-26-2008 07:53 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
Alright, a majority of you people who said... EWW I retract my previous statement.


Chris Cooley - HBack/TE
Fred Davis - TE/FB

Gotta have two good TE's at WCO. No doubt. He was an integral part of the Trojans. Reminds me of Cooley a little, with his size I mean.

Not a bad pick, would've waited till' the next pick if he was still available, and gone after Campbell, but maybe it'll end up like that, just reversed.

BleedBurgundy 04-26-2008 07:54 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
I had a feeling Jackson was headed to Philly.

Gtothearry 04-26-2008 07:54 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
[QUOTE=Kevikazi;443643]Wow...I don't get that pick at all. Why TE? Unless Zorn doesn't like Cooley for some reason.[/QUOTE]

How could anyone not like Cooley.

mooby 04-26-2008 07:54 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
To be rather honest, I don't like this selection of Fred Davis. We have other needs, we were pretty set at TE with Cooley and Yoder. Unless this coaching staff plans on moving him to fullback, or making him bulk up to see o-line I don't really see how Davis can contribute to this team.

EARTHQUAKE2689 04-26-2008 07:54 PM

Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
 
great now we cant kick to DeSean Jackson LOL


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.40415 seconds with 9 queries