![]() |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[quote=skinsfaninok;1165605]Who do we draft at 2?? None of these QBs are worth that. This class is very weak from all experts opinions. This is all just amazing to me, it appears that Kirk doesn't want to play in Washington as I've assumed all along. Now that Kyle is a HC this all makes perfect sense.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote] DL Allen would be the pick at #2 and the best player available at #17.... I doubt it would be a QB. There might be a QB worthy of a 2nd round pick. Let Colt and the rookie battle it out. If they have a running game and a defense the QB would not need to throw for 350 yds.... score 30 points |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[QUOTE=Irrefutable;1165610]it is irrelevant what the Rams did. The Redskins would have an opportunity to get several contributors this season.
Fat Albert was a terrible free agent signing, so does that mean the Redskins never sign a free agent again ?[/QUOTE] Have you not watched this organization operate the last 18 years? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
If they screw this up it's time to really consider supporting another team. My only hope is I can out live Synder so maybe I can see my beloved Redskins win a Championship.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[quote=Irrefutable;1165612]DL Allen would be the pick at #2 and the best player available at #17.... I doubt it would be a QB. There might be a QB worthy of a 2nd round pick. Let Colt and the rookie battle it out. If they have a running game and a defense the QB would not need to throw for 350 yds.... score 30 points[/quote]
If you have Colt Mccoy start week 1 or a rookie, you have to draft Leonard Fournette at number 2. |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Tiki Barber
“Jordan Rodgers is basically stating the obvious, but he said it in a way that actually makes a lot of sense,” Barber said Wednesday. “Kirk Cousins is actually the more viable option, because Kirk Cousins will sit in the pocket and find his guy and read a defense and know pre-snap where he’s going to go with the ball, and if something breaks down, then he finds his checkdown back. Those two guys who they had in Washington were fantastic in giving him support in that role, so yeah, of course you take Kirk Cousins over Cam Newton, even though Cam Newton was the MVP. With Cam Newton, you get an MVP season one year and then the next year you get what the hell we saw in 2016. And what do you want? I’m not sure I want that roller-coaster. I’ve seen that roller-coaster — not with one guy, but with multiple guys over the course of my career. … With Cam Newton, you’re getting year-to-year volatility. With Kirk Cousins, you haven’t had that. It’s been pretty consistent.” |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
We can't fuck this up, can we?
|
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Trade Cousins and use the 49ers # 2 overall pick to draft Deshaun Watson and the best defensive player at # 17. We'd basically get a new QB with way more upside at a fraction of the cost, we could use that money to sign other free agents or roll over into the following years cap. I know people don't think as highly as Watson as I do, but I would be down w/ that.
And people have already hit on this, there is no way we're giving our # 17 overall pick as part of any Cousins trade. That would be full retard and you never go full retard. |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1165622]Trade Cousins and use the 49ers # 2 overall pick to draft Deshaun Watson and the best defensive player at # 17. We'd basically get a new QB with way more upside at a fraction of the cost, we could use that money to sign other free agents or roll over into the following years cap. I know people don't think as highly as Watson as I do, but I would be down w/ that.
And people have already hit on this, there is no way we're giving our # 17 overall pick as part of any Cousins trade. That would be full retard and you never go full retard.[/QUOTE] No to Watson, he's not accurate at all and he'd be another one hit wonder. I'd rather use that pick on an impact player from the Start and sign a vet QB for a couple years. Maybe take Watson at 17 but that's pushing it |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[quote=skinsfaninok;1165623]No to Watson, he's not accurate at all and he'd be another one hit wonder. I'd rather use that pick on an impact player from the Start and sign a vet QB for a couple years. Maybe take Watson at 17 but that's pushing it[/quote]
Like I said, I seem to like him more than everyone else. But he is more than a 1 year wonder. He was awesome at Clemson each year he was there, including beating what many people were discussing as one of the better teams of all times in the championship game. He completed over 67% his passes every year for 3 years. I think his accuracy is ok, but he needs to cut down on the INTs. If we didn't pick a QB though, we couldn't go wrong with getting J. Allen from Alabama. |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Fire Allen, problem solved!!
|
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1165624]Like I said, I seem to like him more than everyone else. But he is more than a 1 year wonder. He was awesome at Clemson each year he was there, including beating what many people were discussing as one of the better teams of all times in the championship game. He completed over 67% his passes every year for 3 years.
I think his accuracy is ok, but he needs to cut down on the INTs. If we didn't pick a QB though, we couldn't go wrong with getting J. Allen from Alabama.[/QUOTE] RG3 was pretty awesome in College as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Can't believe I'm even asking this but would you rather have Cutler or Romo? Excuse me now while I go and vomit.
|
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Cutler. I've hated Romo so much for so many years, I couldn't bring myself to like him ever.
|
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
Romo. We tried zero leadership with Jeff George.
Besides, I just think how hard I would laugh if Romo won SB w/ skins before Jerry did w/ Dak. Unlikley, I know but worth thinking about.....LOL |
Re: Kirk Cousins 365 thread
[quote=MTK;1165628]Can't believe I'm even asking this but would you rather have Cutler or Romo? Excuse me now while I go and vomit.[/quote]
Romo, without question |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.