Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[QUOTE=mredskins;1308710]Exactly we could have the best name best uniform best stadium etc, if we are still losing really bad every year its still all shit.

winning cures all.[/QUOTE]


Its like putting lipstick, mascara, and blush on a pig M. Call us the fuckin douchebags and let us play in Fedex with red and orange swirl uniforms that say D-bags on the helmet. If we are winning you can laugh at all that I don’t give a fuck. Fuck you, u lost to us.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=mredskins;1308710]Exactly we could have the best name best uniform best stadium etc, if we are still losing really bad every year its still all shit.

winning cures all.[/quote]

Winning is the ultimate deodorant.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

One week away thank god

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1308928]One week away thank god[/quote]

I don't care what it is anymore, I just want to move past it already.

Whatever it is, we'll get used to in time. It will never be the same as Redskins, but let's be honest we haven't been those Redskins in 30 years, and under Dan we were never going to reach that peak again.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=MTK;1308932]I don't care what it is anymore, I just want to move past it already.

Whatever it is, we'll get used to in time. It will never be the same as Redskins, but let's be honest we haven't been those Redskins in 30 years, and under Dan we were never going to reach that peak again.[/quote]

If the new name came with a new owner, they could change our name to Washington Dingleberries, and I'd still be behind it the proverbial 110%.

I kind of forgot how close we are to the change now.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=MTK;1308932]I don't care what it is anymore, I just want to move past it already.

[B]Whatever it is, we'll get used to in time. It will never be the same as Redskins, but let's be honest we haven't been those Redskins in 30 years, and under Dan we were never going to reach that peak again.[/B][/quote]

You hit the nail on the head.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=irish;1308941]You hit the nail on the head.[/quote]

[I]<Sigh>[/I]

Sad to say that is true. :mad:

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1308939]If the new name came with a new owner, they could change our name to [B]Washington Dingleberries[/B], and I'd still be behind it the proverbial 110%.

I kind of forgot how close we are to the change now.[/quote]

I'd hate to see the logo they'd use for that name.

Another Snyder sham was pretending to use fan input to pick the new name. The names Wolves or Red Wolves were huge fan favorites. They would have been very popular names. But no, we just get some lame excuses about trademarks to explain why we can't have a decent team name. Since when was Snyder afraid of a law suit? Hell, he seems to live for tangling with others legally. No, Snyder just didn't like the name Wolves so he decided on the name and logo he wanted and to hell with the fans, as usual.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

Love Charles Mann, telling it like it is.

[url]https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/football-team/washington-legend-charles-mann-not-happy-teams-soon-be-official-name[/url]

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;1308955]Love Charles Mann, telling it like it is.

[url]https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/football-team/washington-legend-charles-mann-not-happy-teams-soon-be-official-name[/url][/quote]

Commanders is corny but so is Redwolves and Admirals..

Nothing will beat Redskins so it doesn't really matter.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

The only guarantee is no matter what the name ends up being, there will be those that won't like it.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

I wonder what Charles Mann thinks is a good name ?

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=MTK;1308957]The only guarantee is no matter what the name ends up being, there will be those that won't like it.[/quote]

Not that either of them were my top choices, but I think as long as the name is Commanders or Admirals, it won't get too crazy (at least here). Those 2 options have just been heard for so long, there is some acceptance of them, even if not liked at all.

If the "leak" wasn't an actual leak, and it ends up being a random name, it's gonna be some good reading here and everywhere else.

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[quote=rocnrik;1308979]I wonder what Charles Mann thinks is a good name ?[/quote]

REDSKINS!!

Why is it that the Chicago Blackhawks who have the caricature of an Indian as a mascot are not forced to change their logo?

Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1308951]I'd hate to see the logo they'd use for that name.



Another Snyder sham was pretending to use fan input to pick the new name. The names Wolves or Red Wolves were huge fan favorites. They would have been very popular names. But no, we just get some lame excuses about trademarks to explain why we can't have a decent team name. Since when was Snyder afraid of a law suit? Hell, he seems to live for tangling with others legally. No, Snyder just didn't like the name Wolves so he decided on the name and logo he wanted and to hell with the fans, as usual.[/QUOTE]This, exactly.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk