Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

I'm the commishioner of my keeper league, which costs me $130 a year at sportsline and now nfl.com, but its a great service. So whats another $10 really.

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

[quote=hooskins]Thanks, i do agree with most of your assessment. I guess the main point I was making about Big Ben is that his offensive system is not one which yields high fantasy points, seeing that some games he only throws 15 times, maybe even less. Talentwise, I do think he is much better than Brunell, but I do feel the system that Brunell is in, esp this year with Saunders, will yield higher numbers than our buddy over in Pittsburg.[/quote]Last year they had a power running game. Without Bettis, I see a team very reliant on the screen game. Thats easy pts for Big Ben.

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

Gang,

I would be interested in getting into a keeper league with some Redskins fans.

GTripp, I am with you on the Steelers throwing the football a lot more in 2006. They can't ride the "Bus" to pay dirt anymore so you will be seeing a lot of screens and passes thrown to Heath Miller in the red zone.

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

I still can't believe the Steelers got Miller that late in the draft. :doh:

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

Could I make the suggestion of a Dynasty league? It is like a keeper league except you keep your entire roster (or at least the great bulk of it). It's a really cool way to do a league, because you really have to put together a lasting franchise.

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

i'm down as long as the money isn't crazy.

Re: Fantasy Top 100
 

I'd be interested in joining a Warpath keeper/dynasy league.