![]() |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
we are not bringing in bulger!
it's not really even logical at all |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=dall-assblows;246302]we are not bringing in bulger!
it's not really even logical at all[/quote] When has logic ever been a factor in our front office? |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
that is very true.
|
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=Grim21Reaper;245591]I am pretty sure that Joe made left the possibility open during his press conference.[/quote]
Joe is too nice of a guy to admit that the door has slammed shut on Brunell's career. He really wants to believe that he can go back to him, but hopefully once we get a look at Campbell he'll see just how unrealistic that would be. |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=Mattyk72;246375]Joe is too nice of a guy to admit that the door has slammed shut on Brunell's career. He really wants to believe that he can go back to him, but hopefully once we get a look at Campbell he'll see just how unrealistic that would be.[/quote]
well put, I think the bigger question is what they'll do w/MB next season. I foresee a disagreement between Gibbs & saunders on this. Wouldn't be surprised if collins & mb stay, maybe w/restructured deals. We need to bring in a rookie & groom them as a backup. Did someone on the warpath once say something about MB being a coach here eventually? |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=freddyg12;246380]well put, I think the bigger question is what they'll do w/MB next season. I foresee a disagreement between Gibbs & saunders on this. Wouldn't be surprised if collins & mb stay, maybe w/restructured deals. We need to bring in a rookie & groom them as a backup.
Did someone on the warpath once say something about MB being a coach here eventually?[/quote] I think someone pointed out that we would save more $$ by letting him go than we would by keeping him, so the writing appears to be on the wall. |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
i still think brunell will be a good backup. his numbers ($) don't seem too bad. maybe he can restructure.
|
Re: QB rumor on 980...
i think that NASA will launch the washington and jefferson monuments into space,before the redskins sign mark bulger to be a backup to jason campbell!
|
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=redskinsfanatic;246418]i think that NASA will launch the washington and jefferson monuments into space,before the redskins sign mark bulger to be a backup to jason campbell![/quote]
LOL sounds about right. |
Re: QB rumor on 980...
Isnt it hilarious how we just let trent green go after 5 years of going throught the redskins system, and now we are speculating about giving up picks for his 3rd string backup in St. Louis at the time. Very typical, however, that aside, bulger fits our recievers perfectly, I wouldnt disagree with the move if campbell doesn't work out. When it comes to QB, you gotta get a quality player, every other position you can take chances.
|
Re: QB rumor on 980...
I really hope brunell doesnt back campbell up next season, cause then he'll be rested, and come in at some point and look great, and gibbs will consider him again, we need him out of here. Even if he was a good backup.
|
Re: QB rumor on 980...
[quote=The Zimmermans;246489]Isnt it hilarious how we just let trent green go after 5 years of going throught the redskins system, and now we are speculating about giving up picks for his 3rd string backup in St. Louis at the time. Very typical, however, that aside, bulger fits our recievers perfectly, I wouldnt disagree with the move if campbell doesn't work out. When it comes to QB, you gotta get a quality player, every other position you can take chances.[/quote]
the redskins lost trent green because at the time he was a free agent,the team's ownership was in limbo,and snyder or john cooke could make any monetary choices without the league office approving it first! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.