Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

boy he it that happen i'm so happy we spent all the draft picks and signing bonues on ARE and Lloyd

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

lloyd is such a waste. The niners sure got over on us in that trade. Bad enough we gave up draft picks the signing bonues is a killer right now.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

Ya. As it stands, Lloyd REALLY f***ed us. That is unless he steps up and does great things this year. [U] GREAT [/U]things.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

lloyd didnt f--- us our scouting department did. Or gibbs,little danny and good ole vinny. Lloyd just got paid cant blame him, he cant help that he sucks.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

No, Lloyd HAS the talent. Almost once a week in '05 with the Niners he would make a one handed catch and he put up pretty decent stats that year. Lloyd just needs to do his f***ing job and STFU.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

he probably doesnt care as much since he got paid for nothing. alot of guys have talent. Maybe he needs to get a heart. Tell you what if clark was hurt like lloyd is he would be playing so would have monk. Old school. These guys get paid and dont care.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

[QUOTE=dmek25;338717]no way. Ricky Proehl could run. thrash has absolutely no speed. he is a good special teamer. no more, no less. if he gets on the field alot this season, it means one of 2 things. the skins are blowing someone out. or they are getting blown out[/QUOTE]

What I meant was when Saunders was the receivers coach for the Rams, it was all about Holt, Bruce, Faulk, and Az-Hakim. Those were the main guys and the headline grabbers.

But in the clutch Warner could always count on Proehl. Thrash serves the same capacity. Not talking about style of play.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

proehl was very underated. He was good for the cards and the ramns

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;338780]Why does it matter who plays the No. 2 receiver?[/QUOTE]

Cause if we have someone with the talent level as Thrash at #2, we are in deep poo. That's why it matters. According to the stats I already provided for you, Thrash is accustomed to getting 13-17 catches a season and barely reaching 200 yards, if you think that's a #2, then this argument will go no where. So I will say it again, if thrash is our #2, our season is over.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

hmm lets see clark was a number 2 wr. rice had taylor. etc helps alot. Wish we had a number 2 instead of alot of number 3's on this team

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

[quote=jsarno;338858]Cause if we have someone with the talent level as Thrash at #2, we are in deep poo. That's why it matters. According to the stats I already provided for you, Thrash is accustomed to getting 13-17 catches a season and barely reaching 200 yards, if you think that's a #2, then this argument will go no where. So I will say it again, if thrash is our #2, our season is over.[/quote]Accustomed? What, is Thrash going to break down into particle matter the moment he hits 20 catches?

Please explain why it matters that Thrash didn't have a lot of playing time in the past.

By your argument, we are already screwed because Lloyd and Randle El aren't very good. Should we just forfeit the season now?

I don't disagree with you often, jsarno, but in this case, I couldn't disagree more. Please excuse my consistently incorrect use of punctuation;?!."

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

thrash is a hard worker, great team player. but he is no way a number 2 wr.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

lloyd does suck and ARE is a punt returner who is a number 3 wr at best

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;338864]Accustomed? What, is Thrash going to break down into particle matter the moment he hits 20 catches?

Please explain why it matters that Thrash didn't have a lot of playing time in the past?

By your argument, we are already screwed because Lloyd and Randle El aren't very good. Should we just forfeit the season now?

I don't disagree with you often, jsarno, but in this case, I couldn't disagree more.[/QUOTE]

How about this, Thrash doesn't have the talent to be a #2.
If Lloyd and ARE play like they did last season, then yes, we will be in just as much trouble, but I don't see that happening. Lloyd is going to break out, and ARE will be a good playmaker.
Why is it everyone annoints Thrash? The man has never done anything significant, yet we think he can be a valuable #2???? That doesn't make any sense at all.

Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
 

The 2nd WR is just that...the second best wide receiver on your team (who plays the second most snaps or catches the second most passes). There are no skill qualifications for a No. 2 reciever. It's a media term, and not even one of the better ones.