Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Compensatory picks are in (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=23039)

FRPLG 03-31-2008 11:12 PM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=freddyg12;436017]Every other team is hardly that successful w/the draft. Often, not even half of draft picks make a team. If all draft picks made their teams every year there'd be hardly any vets around.[/QUOTE]

I didn't think I needed to put the sarcasm tags around my post. I guess I was wrong.

GMScud 04-01-2008 12:56 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[quote=riggins44;435999]It is basically the first 4th round pick, but tell that to his agent.[/quote]

It is still the 96th pick though. A chance to land one of the top 100 college players in the country who will have a legitimate shot to make this roster and contribute. It's a gift for a free agent former skins who performed well. We can thank Buffalo for giving Dockery a huge contract, and we can thank Dock for staying healthy and playing well for them.

I said it before, but bottom line is that makes 4 picks in the first 3 rounds. Good stuff.

JoeRedskin 04-01-2008 04:28 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=cpayne5;436038]We should trade some of those compensatory picks to try to pick up a 2nd.


:D, JoeRedskin[/QUOTE]

Hey hey! Don't make me get out my can of whoopass!

offfiss 04-01-2008 08:34 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=JoeRedskin;435968]Let's hope we do a little better than the last time we had this many picks:

2002
1(32) Patrick Ramsey
2(56) Ladell Betts
3(79) Rashad Bauman (CB)
3(87) Cliff Russell (WR)
5(159) Andre Lott (DB)
5(160) Robert Royal
6(192) Reggie Coleman (OT)
7(230) Jeff Grau (TE)
7(234) Greg Scott - (DE)
7(257) Rock Cartwright [/QUOTE]

thank you, a perfect example of why we shouldn't get too excited about this draft. Danny has shown that he's capable of messing up just about anything and this year will be no different. I can only imagine how many wasted picks we'll end up with. We need a real GM!! Where are you Bobby Beathard?!

mooby 04-01-2008 09:05 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[quote=offfiss;436140]thank you, a perfect example of why we shouldn't get too excited about this draft. Danny has shown that he's capable of messing up just about anything and this year will be no different. I can only imagine how many wasted picks we'll end up with. We need a real GM!! Where are you Bobby Beathard?![/quote]

Yeah I'm pretty sure DS hasn't learned anything in the 6 years since that draft. Go look at our drafts under Gibbs compared to our drafts without him, there's a huge difference. I'm excited to have this many picks under our belt, and even though odds are slim we'll find the next Marques Colston in the 7th round, there is no harm in having two extra picks in that round.

freddyg12 04-01-2008 10:12 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[quote=FRPLG;436099]I didn't think I needed to put the sarcasm tags around my post. I guess I was wrong.[/quote]

My bad, my judgement has been skewed by the return of offiss/offfiss!

offfiss 04-01-2008 10:15 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=mooby;436157]Yeah I'm pretty sure DS hasn't learned anything in the 6 years since that draft. Go look at our drafts under Gibbs compared to our drafts without him, there's a huge difference. I'm excited to have this many picks under our belt, and even though odds are slim we'll find the next Marques Colston in the 7th round, there is no harm in having two extra picks in that round.[/QUOTE]

right, we're supposed to believe that Danny all of a sudden knows how to draft? Please, this isn't something that just anyone can do. You have to be able to watch film and break it down. What great drafts did we have under old Man Gibbs' watch? I'd love to hear this one.

skinsfan_nn 04-01-2008 10:26 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[quote=offfiss;436206]right, we're supposed to believe that Danny all of a sudden knows how to draft? Please, this isn't something that just anyone can do. You have to be able to watch film and break it down. What great drafts did we have under old Man Gibbs' watch? I'd love to hear this one.[/quote]

Well being Dan is only one piece of the puzzle, you should be more focused on Vinny being hes our draft guru and remember what he did in San Fran....do you even remember ( I doubt seriously, because you seem clueless as to whats even going on with the Redskins) . Great draft that lead to a Super bowl title!

But since you apparently don't know, I'll give you a couple examples: Lets see your boy that you have so much faith in JC, Cooley, Carlos, Rocky, LaRon, Sean Taylor, do you need any more examples of great drafts under " old man Gibbs "?

DiehardSkin88 04-01-2008 10:30 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
Wasnt 2002 spurriers year? or was it Schottenheimer???

Beemnseven 04-01-2008 10:35 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=JoeRedskin;435968]Let's hope we do a little better than the last time we had this many picks:

2002
1(32) Patrick Ramsey
2(56) Ladell Betts
3(79) Rashad Bauman (CB)
3(87) Cliff Russell (WR)
5(159) Andre Lott (DB)
5(160) Robert Royal
6(192) Reggie Coleman (OT)
7(230) Jeff Grau (TE)
7(234) Greg Scott - (DE)
7(257) Rock Cartwright

Since the 7 round draft began in 1994, we have had:
'94: 7 Picks, 4 in the first three rounds - 7(4)
95: 8 (3)
[B]96: 6 (1) (The one high pick was Andre Johnson - Blecchh)(A Cerrato pick)[/B]
97: 8 (3)
98: 7 (2) - No First Rounder
99: 6 (2)
00: 8 (3) - Two First Rounders (Arrington, Samuels)
01: 5 (2)
02: 10(4) - See above
03: 3(2) - No First (T. Jacobs, D. Dockery, G. Hamdan)
04: 4(2) - (Cooley, Taylor)
05: 6(2) - Two Firsts (Rogers Campbell)
06: 6(1) - No First (McIntosh in the 2nd)
07: 5(1)


I hope we can get some good hits early. I don't know though - we haven't been overwhelmingly successful in the 2-3 rounds.[/QUOTE]

Cerrato wasn't here in '96. Andre Johnson was a Casserly pick. Not one of his best moments.

MTK 04-01-2008 10:36 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
I know it's fun to blame Vinny but this is getting ridiculous.

SkinsFanSince91 04-01-2008 11:47 AM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
The real question is how does this cange everyone's draft predictions?

We will have to go back to the drawing board for the draft now.

At least this time going "back to the drawing board" is good thing.

freddyg12 04-01-2008 12:17 PM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[quote=SkinsFanSince91;436274]The real question is how does this cange everyone's draft predictions?

We will have to go back to the drawing board for the draft now.

At least this time going "back to the drawing board" is good thing.[/quote]

You're right that it does potentially change things. It gives the team more flexibility if they want to trade a pick to move up they know they have the comp. picks afterward. I don't see us moving up in the 1st, but I could see a trade up in any round thereafter. If they like the talent left in the 4th, I could see them trying to package a couple late round picks.

I would love to see us trade down to get more picks but that requires some good fortune & a team that really wants to make a move.

GMScud 04-01-2008 12:27 PM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
I found a full list of all the draft picks in order, including compensatory.

Mike Sando posted it on ESPN.com, but it's a link to an excel file. Here's the link: [url=http://www.mediafire.com/?dcnxnxwj5yx]2008 Draft Order.xls[/url]

The Redskins picks are as follows:

21, 51, 84, 96, 154, 186, 228, 242, and 249.

Don't know if this was already posted, but there it is.

JoeRedskin 04-01-2008 03:46 PM

Re: Compensatory picks are in
 
[QUOTE=Beemnseven;436223]Cerrato wasn't here in '96. Andre Johnson was a Casserly pick. Not one of his best moments.[/QUOTE]

Aaack - you are correct sir. Sorry about that.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.99364 seconds with 9 queries