Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/in-internet-age-sports-teams-are-increasingly-in-the-news-business/2011/02/28/ABPkAtV_story_1.html]In Internet age, sports teams are increasingly in the news business - The Washington Post[/url]

I read the article in the OP and the links. The link above talks about a high school athletic conf in Wisc. that doesnt want other internet companies to stream whole games online b/c they contracted with a co. to have exclusive rights to do that.

Streaming whole games is different from having the name "redskins" used in a section of a newspaper imo. A company streaming whole games online goes much more to the earning revenue side in which a company may make a claim that the online co. is making unauth revenue from use of the company. Just putting the name "redskins" as the title of a newspaper section seems much more public domain/freedom of press since the argument that the wash po is deriving unauth. revenue just from including the name "redskins" is much more of a stretch imo.

What NFL, NHL, MLB or NBA team besides the skins have forced their local major newspaper to not use their name the way the wash po had?

Given the legal battle that the DS brought to the citypaper and claims they want to subpoena wash po writers emails/communications and the overal history of the DS and wash po makes the term "forces" more than appropriate imo.

not a big deal in contrast to the other things the DS has done imo, just another example of the DS further alienating himself from the major newspaper in the city and the fans.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

I think the bigger issue was probably the video webcasts the Post was streaming

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=Mattyk;789256]And the perpection will always be that Snyder is evil. I get it, not a big fan of him myself but a lot of these things are blown out of proportion.[/quote]

I think we are in essential agreement. I don't view Snyder as "evil," which is a word better reserved for the bin Ladens of the world. I just think that he can be very petty. And in this case, poorly timed.

As said, this is not a big deal. I'm done here. :)

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

Penis Insider.


Think about it.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=SmootSmack;789270]I think the bigger issue was probably the video webcasts the Post was streaming[/quote]

Thats what I thought as well, the video streaming of parts of skins games etc, but the wash po (maybe probably self servingly to slant the action as petty) only mentioned changing the name and didnt mention the videos.

I dont go to the wash po for videos, i go to the nfl site who have a great database of categorized videos.

If its about videos, it makes the decision more understandable to me as i could see fans going to the wash po for videos of their team instead of the redskins official site which also has videos or other sites that have contracted with the team for authorization to use videos.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=over the mountain;789283]Thats what I thought as well, the video streaming of parts of skins games etc, but the wash po (maybe probably self servingly to slant the action as petty) only mentioned changing the name and didnt mention the videos.

I dont go to the wash po for videos, i go to the nfl site who have a great database of categorized videos.

If its about videos, it makes the decision more understandable to me as i could see fans going to the wash po for videos of their team instead of the redskins official site which also has videos or other sites that have contracted with the team for authorization to use videos.[/quote]

From the article:

The Redskins recently asked The Washington Post to rename the newspaper’s video webcast and blog about the team, which was called “Redskins Insider,” according to people who have knowledge of the circumstances. The team had used the name “Redskins Insider” first, and The Post agreed to switch to “Football Insider.”

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

Maybe one day I'll be able to tell you guys about similar issues we have with different teams and leagues ("we" being the we that pays me). For now, I'm obligated to do no more than just say it's not uncommon

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=Angry;789272]Penis Insider.


Think about it.[/quote]

That's the publication on Pen Island.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

SS, I understand that other teams do this and it's their right to protect their labels and product. I get that, I really do.

However, I also read that the Giants, Cowboys, and Eagles all have media outlets that have similar blogs or sections in their coverage.


Let's be honest. This boils down to Dan Snyder being a punk ass bitch. He's hated the WaPO since he's taken over because he can't stand criticism. Don't believe me? Read this reporters experience with Dan Snyder first hand. Appalling.

[url=http://www.feinsteinonthebrink.com/index.php?id=1973036700166414836]Feinstein On The Brink[/url]


You don't think this isn't about Danny boy's beef with the WaPO because they've killed him in the papers? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.

I'm sorry, I certainly don't agree with the assessment that Dan Snyder's actions are overblown. Why is it you don't hear a single issue with other owners and the media? I can tell you why. Because most of the other owners are smart enough not to fight with the very people who are covering you.



It's funny though. Dan sure as hell didn't have a problem stealing somebody else name for profit.

[url=http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39754/dan-snyder-vs-the-kennedys-it-has-hooters-and-cigar]Dan Snyder vs. the Kennedys: It Has Hooters and Cigar-Bar Access, But Should it Have RFK's Initials? - Washington City Paper[/url]



Let's not forget this gem. Threatening to fire a cheerleader if her husband talked to a competing media outlet. Overblown? ...lol No, his actions speak to his character.
[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050403588.html]Redskins owner apologizes over TV dispute involving cheerleader[/url]


No. **** Dan Snyder. He'll never atone for the shit he's done to the team. The only way he has a chance if he stays the **** out of the public eye and not speak at all unless it's a charity events. I don't want to hear a single word from this man unless it's "I'm selling the team".

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

^ that's exactly the way I feel.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=SmootSmack;789284]From the article:

The Redskins recently asked The Washington Post to rename the newspaper’s video webcast and blog about the team, which was called “Redskins Insider,” according to people who have knowledge of the circumstances. [B]The team had used the name “Redskins Insider” first, and The Post agreed to switch to “Football Insider.”[/B][/quote]This is the part that I don't really get.

Maybe I'm wrong, but if the main issue really is that the Skins' website used the name "Redskins Insider" before The Post then couldn't the Post have simply changed the name of their blog/webcasts to something that's still Redskins-related? "The Redskins Post Source" or "'Skins News" or whatever, I just don't see why they felt the need to go [I]so[/I] generic with the name unless they're just trying to prove a point.

And again, I'm probably missing a bigger issue.

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=mlmpetert;789122]I really hate this guy. Also my bad about the really long title, please feel free to edit.....[/quote]

Which guy?

Dan Snyder? Dan Steinberg? Paul Farhi?

All of the above?

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;789330]This is the part that I don't really get.

Maybe I'm wrong, but if the main issue really is that the Skins' website used the name "Redskins Insider" before The Post then couldn't the Post have simply changed the name of their blog/webcasts to something that's still Redskins-related? "The Redskins Post Source" or "'Skins News" or whatever, I just don't see why they felt the need to go [I]so[/I] generic with the name unless they're just trying to prove a point.

And again, I'm probably missing a bigger issue.[/quote]

The main issue is the use of 'Redskins'

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

I think this really needs to be said "Who Cares".

Re: Danny Snyder Forces The Washington Post to Rename “Redskins Insider” to “Football Insider”
 

[quote=NC_Skins;789324]SS, I understand that other teams do this and it's their right to protect their labels and product. I get that, I really do.

However, I also read that the Giants, Cowboys, and Eagles all have media outlets that have similar blogs or sections in their coverage.[/quote]

Maybe they don't have other contractual obligations with other media. And they're not talking about shutting down the blog, just changing the name. Do all these other outlets use the team name in their title or do they use generic names such as Birds' Eye View in the Philadelphia Inquirer, or

[quote]
Let's be honest. This boils down to Dan Snyder being a punk ass bitch. He's hated the WaPO since he's taken over because he can't stand criticism. Don't believe me? Read this reporters experience with Dan Snyder first hand. Appalling.[/quote]

What about when I was working at a tv station helping launch a new Sunday night show and we got a letter from John Kent Cooke after the first episode saying we had to remove the word Redskins from the title? Can I call Cooke a punk ass bitch?

[quote][url=http://www.feinsteinonthebrink.com/index.php?id=1973036700166414836]Feinstein On The Brink[/url][/quote]

The guy who called Shanahan a racist for benching McNabb? Yeah, who's the bitch now?

[quote]
You don't think this isn't about Danny boy's beef with the WaPO because they've killed him in the papers? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.

I'm sorry, I certainly don't agree with the assessment that Dan Snyder's actions are overblown. Why is it you don't hear a single issue with other owners and the media? I can tell you why. Because most of the other owners are smart enough not to fight with the very people who are covering you.[/quote]

Actually because the media usually doesn't talk about it. We've had to make several adjustments but we don't go around saying "Bud Selig made us do this"

[quote]
It's funny though. Dan sure as hell didn't have a problem stealing somebody else name for profit.

[url=http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39754/dan-snyder-vs-the-kennedys-it-has-hooters-and-cigar]Dan Snyder vs. the Kennedys: It Has Hooters and Cigar-Bar Access, But Should it Have RFK's Initials? - Washington City Paper[/url][/quote]

I think that's the first I've heard this story

[quote]Let's not forget this gem. Threatening to fire a cheerleader if her husband talked to a competing media outlet. Overblown? ...lol No, his actions speak to his character.
[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050403588.html]Redskins owner apologizes over TV dispute involving cheerleader[/url][/quote]

I don't think we read the same article there, looked like a misunderstanding to me. But whatever, Snyder caused the mess in Iraq...

[quote]
No. **** Dan Snyder. He'll never atone for the shit he's done to the team. The only way he has a chance if he stays the **** out of the public eye and not speak at all unless it's a charity events. I don't want to hear a single word from this man unless it's "I'm selling the team".[/quote]

Fine, whatever