![]() |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=mlmdub130;821991]grammar fail. and no period at the end too? don't boast about grammer and then be all poor and shit w it man, wtf?[/quote]
You past the test. +1 1.Chico 2.mlmdub130 |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=Chico23231;822002]You past the test. +1
1.Chico 2.mlmdub130[/quote] It's.. "you passed the test". Damn it man! |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=BuckSkin;822004]It's.. "you passed the test". Damn it man![/quote]
that was flat out epic fail. hay BuckSkin, buy the way, our u supporting a TP pick up? Id give a 5th round four him to play QB. |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
So no one's going to correct Chico on his sig?
|
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=Chico23231;822011]that was flat out epic fail. hay BuckSkin, buy the way, our u supporting a TP pick up? Id give a 5th round four him to play QB.[/quote]
I know that as a Buckeye fan I should hate TP, but I am still a fan. I've been singing his praises since February on different threads. I would use a 5th and not bat an eye. He is a big game performer. 2-1 in Bowl games and nearly rallied to win against the McCoy lead Horns. Oh yeah, we vacated last year's bowl. |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=SmootSmack;822013]So no one's going to correct Chico on his sig?[/quote]
Its with an ' to become It's. A contraction, which is a shortened form of it is. Satisfactory? |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=SkinzWin;822025]Its with an ' to become It's. A contraction, which is a shortened form of it is.
Satisfactory?[/quote] Chico is just being a hatter. Hatters gon' hat. |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
I only know one part of the Warpath power rankings
2,221. Dirtbag59 |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82155f9e/article/still-the-one-pack-remain-nfls-best-as-freeagent-fury-calms?module=HP11_hot_topics]NFL.com news: Still the one: Pack remain NFL's best as free-agent fury calms[/url]
OUCH |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
I don't mind our ranking but I do mind that.of the cowboys...they were no better than is last year and couldn't have gotten that much better than us. Oh well...time will tell.
|
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=skinsfaninok;822051][url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82155f9e/article/still-the-one-pack-remain-nfls-best-as-freeagent-fury-calms?module=HP11_hot_topics]NFL.com news: Still the one: Pack remain NFL's best as free-agent fury calms[/url]
OUCH[/quote] Dead last? Really? |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=Lotus;822071]Dead last? Really?[/quote]
Boy it's been a long time since I've seen the Skins ranked dead last in the power rankings. Then again, I don't give a shit about power rankings anymore, they don't mean anything. They are just there to invoke discussion. So apparently they've succeeded in that regard here. So anyways, I helped my mom move yesterday. It was the most hellish day I've had in a quite a while. I couldn't see myself doing that on a daily basis, not at all. Now I know why those moving guys honestly don't have that good of a reputation. It's because they just don't care about your shit. |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
A much better power rankings, and not because of where they ranked the Redskins (not 32) but what they have to say which I agree with...
[url=http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/08/11/pre-preseason-power-rankings/]Pre Preseason Power Rankings | ProFootballFocus.com[/url] 26. Washington Redskins Reason to be cheerful: They had an excellent offseason where they managed to upgrade the talent on their roster. Reason to be concerned: They have a lot of new personnel that they’ll be trying to get the best of. It could take quite some time for them to gel into an effective unit. |
Re: NFL Power Rankings
shouldn't dead last be relegated to the teams picking 1-3 in the draft? didn't they earn that?
|
Re: NFL Power Rankings
[quote=That Guy;822085]shouldn't dead last be relegated to the teams picking 1-3 in the draft? didn't they earn that?[/quote]
Lets see. Carolina, yes. Rookie QB from a spread system with very little official time to practice. A sophmore QB that was just horrible last year. Not totally giving up on Clausen but he might need to sign up for the John Beck change of scenery plan one day. Denver, eh could go either way. Their defense is undergoing a complete overhaul and as we know that doesn't always go very well. On the other hand Orton is a very solid QB. Buffalo, a scarpy team that will always play you tough. However they don't exactly have the worlds greatest head coach, Fitzpatrick is average, and they play in the AFC Beast. They're actually my pick for Luck next year. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.