Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

What I'm saying is based on what WAS available this offseason, we had one of the better offseasons in the league. Getting a stud doesn't define a great offseason. Prior to Gibbs coming back we had plenty of "studs" we took in the offseason and many would rate those as the poorest choices we could have taken. Could we have pursued Moss? Sure, but the price that would go along with him monetarily would have been great. Yes, we might have gotten a stud, but I don't think I would have categorized this offseason as great.

BUT, like I said before, it's VERY subjective. :)

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Depth, depth and more depth.

With a D-line that can't be relied upon to generate much pressure on their own, it's critical that Williams has plenty of depth and versatility in his secondary. McQuarters would be a nice sign, plus he can return kicks.[/QUOTE]

Exactly Matty. I couldn't have said it any better.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

No one is saying McQuarters is some stud. But, he'll add depth to a position that requires depth. Williams' system requires at least 3 solid corners (about half of his plays involve 3 CBs). With Rogers, Springs, Harris, McQuarters and youngsters Wilds and Brown, we've got a nice (but not too expensive) stable of corners.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=skinnyfan]We are NOT going to get him for the league minimum...........he is a player! and will demand a little bit of coin, McQuarters would be a starter right away on the defense![/QUOTE]

Uhmm... Ok?

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=RedskinRat]Nice overreaction. Didn't the press conference address other issues too?[/QUOTE]

Who said anything about the press conference?

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=cpayne5]For the simple fact that GWilliams and Co have interest in him. If they think that he will be a good addition to the team, why should we question him? Maybe they actually know what they're doing; after all they did turn our D into one of the more feared units in the league last year.[/QUOTE]

OK... So not at all like the Alex Molden, Ralph Brown situation last year, or the short but sweet Redskins career of Cory " possible replacement for Sean Taylor " Hall, right?

Thank you for clearing that up.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

Let's be clear here, Hall asked for his release, so let's not pin this on the team as a bad move.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=W_REDSKINS]OK... So not at all like the Alex Molden, Ralph Brown situation last year, or the short but sweet Redskins career of Cory " possible replacement for Sean Taylor " Hall, right?

Thank you for clearing that up.[/QUOTE]
So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=cpayne5]So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?[/QUOTE]

Apparently every move the team makes has to be a homerun, otherwise it's a total failure and a lack of competence by the front office.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Let's be clear here, Hall asked for his release, so let's not pin this on the team as a bad move.[/QUOTE]

Who`s pinning anything on the team? Did I say it was a BAD move?

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=cpayne5]So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?[/QUOTE]

Where did you read that?

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

So what exactly is your take here, W_Redskins??

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]So what exactly is your take here, W_Redskins??[/QUOTE]
Yeah, really.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=W_REDSKINS]Where did you read that?[/QUOTE]
Well, it seems that you don't like any of the defensive decisions made regarding the players we've talked about here, which would mean you don't like the way the D is being managed.

You're not making any sense.

Re: R.W. McQuarters
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]What I'm saying is based on what WAS available this offseason, we had one of the better offseasons in the league. Getting a stud doesn't define a great offseason. Prior to Gibbs coming back we had plenty of "studs" we took in the offseason and many would rate those as the poorest choices we could have taken. Could we have pursued Moss? Sure, but the price that would go along with him monetarily would have been great. Yes, we might have gotten a stud, but I don't think I would have categorized this offseason as great.

BUT, like I said before, it's VERY subjective. :)[/QUOTE]

We used to get OLD Studs past their prime... I think YES we finally got away from that...