![]() |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=skinsfaninok;1308985]Twitter FBI agents (I’m kidding) aka people with no life have found that the commanders domain is now legally under one of the NFL.com database..
This shit is so dumb, why did they make us all wait this long again??[/quote] Why do people go through the trouble of doing that? Twitter is the fucking worst. A bunch of wanna be newsbreakers. There should be a law that everyone can not use social media for a month... |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=skinsfan69;1309015]Why do people go through the trouble of doing that? Twitter is the fucking worst. A bunch of wanna be newsbreakers. There should be a law that everyone can not use social media for a month...[/quote]
Agreed, I don't get people's obsession with knowing something ahead of time. Is like don't you have anything better to do? |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1308981]REDSKINS!!
Why is it that the Chicago Blackhawks who have the caricature of an Indian as a mascot are not forced to change their logo?[/quote] It just proves that this wasn't about appeasing the small group of people that were complaining about the name. It was never about that. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1308981]REDSKINS!!
Why is it that the Chicago Blackhawks who have the caricature of an Indian as a mascot are not forced to change their logo?[/quote] Because no one cares about Hockey. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=Ruhskins;1309020]Because no one cares about Hockey.[/quote]
The Chiefs fans were doing the tomahawk Sunday night... How's that not racist? Also their name is CHIEFS LOL. It's all BS but whatever I'm glad it's over and we can move on in 5 days |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=skinsfaninok;1309022]The Chiefs fans were doing the tomahawk Sunday night... How's that not racist? Also their name is CHIEFS LOL. It's all BS but whatever I'm glad it's over and we can move on in 5 days[/quote]
It is, but they win. We've been screwed over by having not just a losing team, but an ass of an owner that has done terrible things, and we're located in a big TV market with everyone's eyes on the team. At this point, I don't care if we are called the Sillynannies, I just want the team to win and to get rid Snyder. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Let those other teams worry about the mob coming after them .. and they will !! The name announcement on the 2cnd will start the debate over on other teams .. it’s on National TV .. It will be interesting to see if other teams get talked about … Braves,Chiefs,Indians..oops , blackhawks, seminoles … smh
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Our name sort of stood out due to its derogatory nature. It would be like if there were teams called the samurais, the ninjas, etc and we would be the chinks. Again, not taking a side one way or another but it’s fairly obvious to me why we were sort of singled out. Cleveland made their decision without real pressure. There was pressure about chief wahoo because it was pretty over the top. They probably did not have to change the name though.
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=Ruhskins;1309020]Because no one cares about Hockey.[/quote]
Not true at all. It's huge in a lot of cities. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=skinsfaninok;1309022]The Chiefs fans were doing the tomahawk Sunday night... How's that not racist? Also their name is CHIEFS LOL. It's all BS but whatever I'm glad it's over and we can move on in 5 days[/quote]
What the Chiefs do before their games is waaaaaaay more racist than Redskins or HTTR. It's not even close. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[quote=punch it in;1309026]Our name sort of stood out due to its derogatory nature. It would be like if there were teams called the samurais, the ninjas, etc and we would be the chinks. Again, not taking a side one way or another but it’s fairly obvious to me why we were sort of singled out. Cleveland made their decision without real pressure. There was pressure about chief wahoo because it was pretty over the top. They probably did not have to change the name though.[/quote]
Redskins by far was the lowest hanging fruit. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1309028]What the Chiefs do before their games is waaaaaaay more racist than Redskins or HTTR. It's not even close.[/QUOTE]
Fans actions vs organization. The sponsors are tied to the organization not their fanbase. It is pretty difficult to pressure the team thru their fans actions. If we are putting them on a racist scale i would probably lean towards a derogatory name though. But whatever we are just beating a dead horse. Like rik n chief said lets get a quarterback and kick ass. Call us winners. |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
[QUOTE=mooby;1308998]Commanders? I am whelmed.
Hope this internet domain bs is part of the misdirection Wright alluded to on McAfee's show.[/QUOTE]If the name is not Commanders I will be amazed by the FO's ability to keep it under wraps. That is the only name out there at this point. I think Admirals was their weak attempt at misdirection and it didn't go anywhere. If it is Commanders I will forever link Napoleon Snyder to it and the mental image of a short little egotistical man who fucked things up royally. Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk |
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
I really never think about Snyder …no more than other fans think about the owners of there team .. go to cowboys site and the fans in general loath Jerry.. Winning cures all !!
|
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22
Thing with Snyder is he took a great franchise and turned it into a joke on every level. On the field and off.
He is literally responsible for the death of a great franchise. There are plenty of bad owners, but i cant think if another one who ruined a franchise in such a way. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.