Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=SirLK26;1101417]Roberts was a guy I was hoping we would sign in free agency, but he's been a disappointment on offense. Drops passes and fumbles way too much.

That said, he's been an improvement on special teams.[/quote]

And to think Roberts would have been our #2 wr behind Garcon.....it was a good thing that we signed DJAX.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=Mattyk;1101416]He did but it was his first all year no?[/quote]

It was, I just felt like stating the obvious.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;1101419]And to think Roberts would have been our #2 wr behind Garcon.....it was a good thing that we signed DJAX.[/quote]I think we might be getting spoiled at WR. Roberts is fine for a #2. Him at #3 and Moss #4 makes our WR corps very good.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=HailGreen28;1101426]I think we might be getting spoiled at WR. Roberts is fine for a #2. Him at #3 and Moss #4 makes our WR corps very good.[/quote]

Yeah but I want to see things out of Ryan Grant and Hankerson before the year is over. It's too bad Aldrick Robinson is no longer on the team.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[QUOTE=REDSKINS4ever;1101434]Yeah but I want to see things out of Ryan Grant and Hankerson before the year is over. It's too bad Aldrick Robinson is no longer on the team.[/QUOTE]
Didn't Grant have good games early or am I confusing preseason with regular?

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1101444]Didn't Grant have good games early or am I confusing preseason with regular?[/QUOTE]


U got me thinking so i looked it up. He was 5-57 yards against Jags, and 1-4 yards weeks later. Other than that nada. Guess preseason he shined.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;1101434]Yeah but I want to see things out of Ryan Grant and [B]Hankerson [/B]before the year is over. It's too bad Aldrick Robinson is no longer on the team.[/quote]

Hankerson. LOL. The new and improved Malcolm Kelly.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1101444]Didn't Grant have good games early or am I confusing preseason with regular?[/quote]

Maybe he's been having bad practice habits?? His absence confuses me.He tore it up in preseason,looked good in the games he played,and I havent seen him get a snap in ages.To stick Moss in ahead of Grant makes no sense to me,to stick Hankerson in ahead of Grant makes no sense to me

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=htownskinfan;1101452]Maybe he's been having bad practice habits?? His absence confuses me.He tore it up in preseason,looked good in the games he played,and I havent seen him get a snap in ages.To stick Moss in ahead of Grant makes no sense to me,to stick Hankerson in ahead of Grant makes no sense to me[/quote]

I have the same questions...the guys looks like a bona-fide Pro receiver with great hands.

I can't understand why he hasn't seen the field.

I do think he has a bright future though.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

Grant's time will come. He's a rookie and having a great preseason doesn't mean squat.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

Grant has had trouble escaping the jams of real corners (not the 3rd stringers of preseason). Hopefully he is working on this and will be a big contributor next year. We didn't draft him to be an immediate starter.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=Lotus;1101451]Hankerson. LOL. The new and improved Malcolm Kelly.[/quote]

Hankerson is a puzzling one. He must really suck in practice because other than his first game back from IR (which he screwed up a couple of assignments) he's been inactive every week. He's fully healthy apparently but must be deep in Gruden's doghouse. Another wasted third round pick, SMH!

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

There's no way Hankerson is truly 100%.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

Hank's a f'ing bust. I've been saying this for a long time. Cut that dead weight and move on.

Grant on the other hand I think will end up being a decent starter in the future.

Re: RG3 and Gruden?
 

[quote=Lotus;1101467]Grant has had trouble escaping the jams of real corners (not the 3rd stringers of preseason). Hopefully he is working on this and will be a big contributor next year. We didn't draft him to be an immediate starter.[/quote]

Good point. Even in preseason I noticed that he lacked the strength to get position on corners. I think that he needs to get bigger and stronger to compete in the NFL. Once he does that we should see more of him.