Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=Bucket;1154716]I'd they go with McCoy. They might as well fire Jay Gruden and start looking for a new head coach. Just because McCoy is cheaper, doesn't make it a better situation. Especially with 70 million in cap we will have even in the offseason.

You build a team to win games. You don't just say "fuck it" Let's roll with our 2nd string journeyman this year.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever seen. If I'm not sugar coating it. Be the laughing stock of the NFL to tag Kirk for 20 mil this year, just to let the guy who threw for 5k yards go, and run with McCoy because he's cheaper. Holy lawl.[/quote]

It is ridculous, that's why i wanted to try and clarify with my post that it is not my wish or me saying "it's a good idea", i just get asked alot at work being one of the only redskins fans what we will do at QB if we let Cousins go. That's why i'm saying that could be one possible option, run with McCoy while they try and figure out who their long-term guy is. I was just saying that if they win with McCoy, then the problem might appear to be solved for a while.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

If having a revolving door for inexpensive journeyman QB's works, then the Cleveland Browns would be Super Bowl Champions.

How did that work out in Houston over the last several seasons when the Texans wasted a dominating defense?

A capable and experienced QB is a must to win a title. If you have one, then you have no choice but to keep him and pay him the market rate for his services. It's hard for me to imagine that Kirk Cousins is playing to keep his job at this point. Instead, he is playing to determine the rate for his services going forward.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1154713]When people ask me about this at work, the answer i give is that they would go forward with McCoy because you have him locked up under a LOW contract i believe for the next two years, which fits the mold for Scott M not wanting to spend big money that could affect building the rest of the team.

First let me clarify that I AM NOT SAYING that McCoy could do just as well as Cousins in this system, because i don't think anyone truly knows. Gruden was committed 100% to Cousins in the offseason so I don't think anyone was truly looking at Colt to see how good he was or wasn't. Chris Cooley during his preseason broadcasts was high on Colt and felt that McCoy could start for at least half a dozen teams for sure, and maybe another five or 6 have a chance to battle for the starting job.

So in this scenario Scott M decides to not pay Cousins, they let him walk after this season, and so next season you open the season with Colt McCoy as the day 1 starter. If he plays well and the skins do well, then they look like geniuses because they saved the big money to use to load up on other players. You wont have a money issue until its time for Colt to get a new deal. Obviously if Colt fails then you turn to Sudfield to see what you have in him. If he plays well, then you may have a solution for a while, until it comes contract time and then maybe it's rinse and repeat with whatever possible QB's you have on the roster at that time.

Say for example this works, i wonder if it would change how the league pays QB's. What i am getting at - if a team can get quality / solid play out of QB's who sign lower money contracts, then what is the need to pay a guy 25 - 30 million a season if a team is able to win, or go to a Superbowl with a guy who is only making 2 or 3 million? You could then use that money to load up on other talent...[/quote]

I'm gonna apologize in advance for this one SS. But I gotta.
[IMG]http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/4f/4f637c7041efa528d6c8fa85ffb757c0298ea3d84039787af73f713bd0b162e2.jpg[/IMG]

Imagine a world... Where average quarterbacks make elite player money!

You've just imagined reality. You can thank Osweiler and the Texans for that.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

It's been so long since we've had a QB worth paying it's like people don't know how to handle it. Letting Cousins walk would be ridiculous.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1154719]It is ridculous, that's why i wanted to try and clarify with my post that it is not my wish or me saying "it's a good idea", i just get asked alot at work being one of the only redskins fans what we will do at QB if we let Cousins go. That's why i'm saying that could be one possible option, run with McCoy while they try and figure out who their long-term guy is. I was just saying that if they win with McCoy, then the problem might appear to be solved for a while.[/quote]

I would bet my house that if we went with McCoy we would be a 5-11, 6-10 team. His arm strength is horrid. He can't make across the field throws consistently. He's injury prone.

Behind the same Oline he has a 8% sack rate, compared to Kirk's 4%. So in a nutshell, the 12 sacks Kirk has taken this year would be more like 24 sacks in 8 games

There is just so much wrong with McCoy it's not even worth getting in to.

Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[QUOTE=MTK;1154722]It's been so long since we've had a QB worth paying it's like people don't know how to handle it. Letting Cousins walk would be ridiculous.[/QUOTE]



Some people realize his value, but they seem terrified about a few million dollar difference in paying him. That is a real head scratcher because what can you do with that few mill if you let KC walk? Sign another high price free agent(if one is available) that has no experience in this offense- or sign a journeyman for a lot less and use the extra money for some upgrade at ILB or DB? No thanks. With Brian Hoyer (for example) we have no chance of winning even if it allows to upgrade a position somewhere else. QB is too important.
Another option would be draft one I guess or go with Sudfeld - no thanks again. Not in the mood to start over.
The only option is that some stud, can't miss qb falls to us in the draft or some stud young free agent is available for us to pick up? Neither of those things is very likely to happen.
There are no better options than paying KC and adding a few pieces thru the draft/FA and keeping this TEAM together to grow.
Not one person, who is not on board with KC, (on here or in the media), has offered up any realistic scenario where we get better with KC gone next year. Because there aint one.

Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[QUOTE=SolidSnake84;1154719]It is ridculous, that's why i wanted to try and clarify with my post that it is not my wish or me saying "it's a good idea", i just get asked alot at work being one of the only redskins fans what we will do at QB if we let Cousins go. That's why i'm saying that could be one possible option, run with McCoy while they try and figure out who their long-term guy is. I was just saying that IF THEY WIN WITH MCCOY, then the problem might appear to be solved for a while.[/QUOTE]


That would be the only small problem with this scenario

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1154719]It is ridculous, that's why i wanted to try and clarify with my post that it is not my wish or me saying "it's a good idea", i just get asked alot at work being one of the only redskins fans what we will do at QB if we let Cousins go. [B]That's why i'm saying that could be one possible option, run with McCoy while they try and figure out who their long-term guy is. I was just saying that if they win with McCoy, then the problem might appear to be solved for a while.[/quote]
[/B]

Why would you try and go back to figuring out who the long term guy is when we pretty much know who that guy is? He's just coming off a season where he broke and tied Redskin passing records in his first full year starting. Yeah he does throw stupid picks but so does Eli Manning. Smart organizations don't do what you're suggesting.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1154726][/B]

Why would you try and go back to figuring out who the long term guy is when we pretty much know who that guy is? He's just coming off a season where he broke and tied Redskin passing records in his first full year starting. Yeah he does throw stupid picks but so does Eli Manning. Smart organizations don't do what you're suggesting.[/quote]

I'm not suggesting they do it, i was just saying that was one possible idea. My idea was insane. I don't think it is a good suggestion at all, i was just saying....

And i have to sort of laugh at myself and the way this thread is going because we brought up Brian Hoyer again LOL. A few pages back, the debate was going on about Brian Hoyer and i made my now infamous quote about Kenny Britt saying that Case Keenum was a baller, and after that post, Keenum went on to throw 7 interceptions in 2 games...

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[QUOTE=SolidSnake84;1154727]I'm not suggesting they do it, i was just saying that was one possible idea. My idea was insane. I don't think it is a good suggestion at all, i was just saying....



And i have to sort of laugh at myself and the way this thread is going because we brought up Brian Hoyer again LOL. A few pages back, the debate was going on about Brian Hoyer and i made my now infamous quote about Kenny Britt saying that Case Keenum was a baller, and after that post, Keenum went on to throw 7 interceptions in 2 games...[/QUOTE]



It is one possible idea, but also one terrible idea.
Now McCoy is balling too. [emoji6]

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

I'd take simien from Denver that's the only guy I want if we don't keep Kirk.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

So let me get this straight..there are some of you that actually prefer Colt over Kirk?? Do you realize that Kirk surrounded by an average team is on pace to break all time redskin passing records..he already has some of the records from last year! the biggest knock against Kirk seems to be his long ball because the rest of his game is top notch. for the record McCoy does not have the arm Kirk Has . At least Kirk can throw the ball long it just seems they never hook up but it keeps the D honest. unless We have to pay Cousins some crazy amount I for one think he has played his way into a nice contract . We need this position to be stable so we can focus on other needs..

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

Snake for the love of God, go away.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=Schneed10;1154833]Snake for the love of God, go away.[/quote]

Counterpoint: Snake, don't go away. If you left the ecosystem of the forums would go out of whack and this place would go dull with all manner of like-minded rational people agreeing on various subjects. Imagine this discussion happening every single day:

Person 1: Kirk is a decent quarterback. He will make mistakes, but his good plays will be enough to balance it out. Let's pay him above-average quarterback money long term so we can focus on other holes on the roster.

Person 2: I agree.

Person 3: I am in agreement as well.

Person 4: It seems we're all in agreement. Toodle-loo!

DAE see how dull and boring that is? Save us Snake! I come here for a mixture of solid discussion and entertainment. And you are a big part of that.

Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1154727]I'm not suggesting they do it, i was just saying that was one possible idea. My idea was insane. I don't think it is a good suggestion at all, i was just saying....[/quote]

I'm more interested in what you believe should be done. Taking a position, owning it, and being prepared to defend it is an approach that seems to produce good discussions around here.