![]() |
Re: Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/Trades
[quote=Lotus;896848]Plus PFT facts generally are on-target. PFT editorializing remains quite suspect. So as long as you are quoting facts you generally are in good shape.[/quote]
Exactly, the editorials are the sketchy part of PFT. An analogy if you will. Tampering is to PFT as Lupus is to House. [YT]bueW1i9kQao[/YT] |
Re: Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/Trades
[quote=Dirtbag59;896826]I think we're past that now. I mean seeing as how they're owned by NBC and have continued to produce credible stories over the past few years they've earned the right to be deemed legitimate. Maybe not a better source then ESPN, SI.com, etc but certainly nowhere near as bad as needing an apology above their link :D[/quote]
PFT does a good job at gathering stories from different parts of the country and publishing it. I'd rather get scoops from Glazer, Schefter, or from local beat reporters (although some can be suspect as well). Regardless, I'd prefer to pass on a PFT story that has an additional source. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.