Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sean Taylor Spitting Video (merged) (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=10425)

Schneed10 01-11-2006 10:37 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Kinda funny how someone was just telling me to get off my high horse and saying how my opinion was based on emotion and was ridiculous.[/QUOTE]

I didn't get my feelings hurt, if that's what you're implying. It's not an emotional issue for me, but because you have shown a tendency to be judgmental in this thread, I think it speaks to why you can't look at the spitting situation objectively, and I think it affects your credibility a bit.

jbcjr14 01-11-2006 10:40 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Just for the record Romo was fined $7500 for spitting at JJ Stokes in '97.[/QUOTE]

Inflation is a bitch.

hesscl34 01-11-2006 10:42 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[color=black][font='Times New Roman']What an embarrassment! That is not Joe Gibbs football! That boy better eat some humble pie and grow up!
[/font][/color]

Schneed10 01-11-2006 10:43 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=12thMan]Schneed, did you go to law go school?[/QUOTE]

No I didn't. I just had a couple law classes through grad school, but they focused more on contract law. I always thought spitting did not classify as battery, so I was wrong on that one. But it doesn't really change my stance, since the definition Matty posted indicates that Spitting is seen as equivalent to Punching. They should be treated the same in football too.

I just mean to say, in this entire thread, that Taylor should not have been ejected. Spitting is wrong, but not more so than throwing a punch.

firstdown 01-11-2006 10:43 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
Maybe the fine was only 17,000 because Taylor got jacked in the side of the head and there was no penalty for that and that off set some of the fine.

Schneed10 01-11-2006 10:46 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=firstdown]Maybe the fine was only 17,000 because Taylor got jacked in the side of the head and there was no penalty for that and that off set some of the fine.[/QUOTE]

I think there is some truth to this. Portis got fined $20K for wearing the wrong socks, I think that says everything.

MTK 01-11-2006 10:52 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Schneed10]I didn't get my feelings hurt, if that's what you're implying. It's not an emotional issue for me, but because you have shown a tendency to be judgmental in this thread, I think it speaks to why you can't look at the spitting situation objectively, and I think it affects your credibility a bit.[/QUOTE]

My view that spitting is a more heinous act than throwing a punch is my objective opinion. I thought the same exact way when Romo did it, and I feel the same way now that one of our guys is guilty of the same thing. Despite what you may think my opinion is not based on emotion and I don't see how I'm passing judgement by holding this opinion. You're telling me my view is ridiculous and based on emotion, so who's the one passing judgement??

You feel that spitting and punching should be treated the same... despite the fact a few people have layed out a couple of good posts as to why they aren't treated the same way in our society. It's not the black and white issue that you want it to be and frankly I'm surprised you seem to have such a narrow view of things, considering how open minded you usually are.

onlydarksets 01-11-2006 10:54 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Schneed10]I think there is some truth to this. Portis got fined $20K for wearing the wrong socks, I think that says everything.[/QUOTE]
As I posted [url=http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?p=140400#post140400]elsewhere[/url], I don't think that it necessarily does say it all:
My understanding with CP is that it was an escalating fine - the first violation had a low fine, the second was $20k, and, if he had done it a third time, he was going to get suspended. I'm not saying that "ticky-tack" stuff should get the same merit as spitting but, rather, that, repeat violations will always get more attention than first time violations.

Somebody responded that Taylor spit on TJ Houshmanzadeh previously, so that could kill my theory, but I don't think the CP $20k fine can be looked at in a vacuum.

Warpath 01-11-2006 10:56 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
When I was watching the game I didn't hear Mike Carey say all those things. I did not hear him say that Sean Taylor was ejected for spitting, I also didn't hear him say anything about pittman is not going to be penalized for retaliation. I have the game on dvd and there is no audio on the ref when he made those calls. The booth even kept saying over and over that the refs made a mistake for throwing Taylor out, meaning they didnt hear the call either. Its weird seeing this video with actual audio on it, because it was definitely not heard at all during the game. I also did not see Taylor fighting the penalty and Carey was right on the spot so I just assumed he saw something more than I could from home. Go skins....get ready to post those beer counts again....

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 01-11-2006 11:11 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Personally I thought an ejection for spitting at another player was appropriate.[/QUOTE]

To be perfectly honest, if that was Roy Williams spitting on Clinton Portis I'd say he deserved to be suspended for 2 games so the same should go for Taylor. Absolutely disgusting. That is NOT a Gibbs-type player. I don't care how talented he is, that is just absolutely classless. To boot, he lied to Gibbs, Williams and his teammates about it.

Schneed10 01-11-2006 11:12 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]My view that spitting is a more heinous act than throwing a punch is my objective opinion. I thought the same exact way when Romo did it, and I feel the same way now that one of our guys is guilty of the same thing. Despite what you may think my opinion is not based on emotion and I don't see how I'm passing judgement by holding this opinion. You're telling me my view is ridiculous and based on emotion, so who's the one passing judgement??

You feel that spitting and punching should be treated the same... despite the fact a few people have layed out a couple of good posts as to why they aren't treated the same way in our society. It's not the black and white issue that you want it to be and frankly I'm surprised you seem to have such a narrow view of things, considering how open minded you usually are.[/QUOTE]

I guess you touched on the fundamental difference in our arguments, it's probably the difference that is at the heart of our disagreement.

I personally don't feel that society's unspoken rules should have any place on the football field, or in the courtroom. These unspoken rules are usually driven by the way people feel about things. If people could rationalize these feelings, these rules would not need to go unspoken, they could be written down as laws or as rules in the NFL rulebook. But people have a hard time rationalizing why these unspoken rules are in place, and thus, remain as unwritten social norms and mores.

You seem to feel like these rules are applicable. I personally can't understand how applying rules based on feelings is objective, but this is the kind of thing we're never going to agree on, so we might as well agree to disagree. We'll never get anywhere with a fundamental disagreement like this one. It may have gotten animated, but you should know that I enjoyed the discussion because I found it stimulating.

Luckily, Taylor's ejection did not hurt the Redskins since they still won, and ultimately the team is what I care about most, and I think you will agree with me on that one. No matter how gross that loogie was, we've both said we still want him on the Skins, despite that act. And I guess that's the only common ground we can come to on a dispute like this. But luckily, it's the common ground that really matters.

FRPLG 01-11-2006 11:17 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
Now that we are actually citing US law I think we can officially call this the biggest "I have nothing better to do" thread ever. That's not a jab at anyone in particular but everyone who has participated so stridently (very much including me) and more a reflection of that whole discussion in general. I am officially done with this one. I think we have WAY over-reacted.

Lets agree to drop it and move on to worrying about the Seahags. Go Skins!

skindogger47 01-11-2006 11:20 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
Lying to Coach Williams is more a aggregious penalty than spitting on Pittman IMO. Good thing Sean Taylor is the best football player in the NFL. If OJ can get away with murder, ST can get away with spitting on a wife beater.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 01-11-2006 11:22 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
Schneed,

It would be fine to argue that the league should not have "unsportsmanlike conduct" penalties and therefore the spitting incident should not have been punished. That would be fine, although I would disagree with it. But, you cannot honestly be saying that spitting on another player doesn't constitute "unsportsmanlike conduct." It's a rule that is in the NFL rulebook and I think for good reason. I don't want to see the NFL turn into another classless sport.

BTW-I also agree with the uniform fines as I think teams should be UNIFORM, not a bunch of idiots wearing similar color schemes but dressed in their own clothes.

diehardskin2982 01-11-2006 11:22 AM

Re: Sean Taylor Spitting Video
 
I don't know why people are blowing this so out of proportion. Taylor is an Asshole. O well, he still a great player, and makes a huge difference for us. Sometimes you need a nasty asshole on your team to itimidate the other team

I'm still a Sean Taylor fan


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.39748 seconds with 9 queries