Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

He'll give you 3500+ yards, and 20 TDs and 18 INTs. Nothing special about Cutler whatsoever and he is certainly not better than JC.

When I upgrade, I upgrade to first class not from one business class seat to another business class seat. You dig?

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=saden1;593693]He'll give you 3500+ yards, and 20 TDs and 18 INTs. Nothing special about Cutler whatsoever and he is certainly not better than JC.

When I upgrade, I upgrade to first class not from one business class seat to another business class seat. You dig?[/quote]

But what if you prefer a window seat to a middle seat?

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=SBXVII;593683]Why does this topic keep coming up? I'm not trying to be mean just that I'm happy we didn't make the trade also cause I think we can all agree his stats are very similar to JC's. If your going to trade atleast try to trade up not into a paralell universe.

but the trade was not made. Everyone's happy for different reasons. Lets move on.[/quote]

This is going to go on all year. One week the pro JC guys when he has a good game and Cutler sucks then the next will be the pro Cutler guys when he has a good game and JC sucks. I agree with you lets just move on enjoy the win and enjoy the season because there is nothing that can be done now.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

Im sorry but i have to give credit to anybody that can beat pittsburgh with wrs named Knox,Bennett and Hester with a running game that was nonexistant.
But like you said, it doesnt matter now.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

If that's what it takes to beat Pittsburgh, then Soup needs to man up.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=SBXVII;593683]Why does this topic keep coming up? I'm not trying to be mean just that I'm happy we didn't make the trade also cause [b]I think we can all agree his stats are very similar to JC's.[/b] If your going to trade atleast try to trade up not into a paralell universe.

but the trade was not made. Everyone's happy for different reasons. Lets move on.[/quote]


Well Cutler threw for nearly 1300 more yards, and almost doubled campbells total tds (27 to 14). Of course Cutler had 10 more turnovers (23 to 13), and had the same comp%, but cutler edged campbell in rating by 1.7. But who among us would not want the 1300 or so more yards and the 13 more tds?

That being said, we CERTAINLY should agree that to make that move would have hurt us in the long run. Cutler IS better, no question, but the move would not have made sense for us. I just found it funny that Cutler comes out of the gate with a new team and knowing half the playbook, does poorly and a thread saying "cutler sucks donkey" appears. But when he does VERY well vs the STEELERS no one says a word until after I bring it up. However, Campbell is on pace for 8 tds and 16 turnovers and BARELY beat the lowly Rams, yet we still are thinking Campbell and Cutler are somehow similar. Pfff. Of course I do feel bad for Campbell, HE WILL be the scapegoat for our offensive woes, and he WILL be run out of town if this continues to happen when in fact it's clearly a coaching issue coupled by the lack of Campbell to see the field in the redzone. If Campbell produced just 2 tds out of our 4 redzone trips, this would all be moot...but he didn't.

Sorry for the rant, point is, Cutler DOES NOT SUCK DONKEY.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=SmootSmack;593699]But what if you prefer a window seat to a middle seat?[/quote]


That's not an upgrade, that's a lateral move based on personal preference. If two hot chicks sat on my row I would be more inclined to take the middle seat so I can more easily alternate resting my head on their bosom.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

Shouldnt this be Campbell VS Orton instead of Cutler VS Campbell and/or Orton?
Both guys were being included in a package to get Cutler so its pretty obvious who is better of the 3 so lets see if we can prove McDaniels wrong.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

Cutler will be just fine, anyone that doesn't believe that just stay tuned!

Mike H. chimes in on Cutler's perception.

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/26/holmgren-weighs-in-on-cutler/]Holmgren weighs in on Cutler | ProFootballTalk.com[/url]

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

Well if we are bringing Holmgren in, remember [URL="http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/05/08/all-eyes-on-jason-campbell-in-dc/"]his thoughts on JC[/URL]:

[QUOTE]"Here you have a young quarterback and a really good young quarterback and coach, it seems like a marriage made in heaven," said Holmgren who watched Zorn develop his star quarterback, Matt Hasselbeck, years ago in Seattle. "The thing is you have to have some patience. He's a young guy. And he may come in soon and shock everybody. Look at the young quarterback in Baltimore [Joe] Flacco, he's not being asked to do the same things as Campbell. He's not throwing the ball as much as Jason. If you're in the West Coast offense, you're going to be asked to do a lot more."[/QUOTE]

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;595666][B]Well if we are bringing Holmgren in[/B], remember [URL="http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/05/08/all-eyes-on-jason-campbell-in-dc/"]his thoughts on JC[/URL]:[/quote]

First off I haven't heard we are even interested in Mike H., yea I know he's one of the top five names. Those names I'm thinking of in order would be Mike S., Bill C., John G., Bill B., Mike H., if I had to guess one of these five Superbowl winning coachs currently unemployed would be our next HC, no later than next year.

Just my thought. If things don't work out for the Z man in DC, which by the way I don't happen to think they will beyond this season, best case.

IMO I don't think Mike H. would be the guy, Dan would like to have here as his next HC. The other Mike (Shanny) whole different ball game.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=skinsfan_nn;595675]First off I haven't heard we are even interested in Mike H., yea I know he's one of the top five names. Those names I'm thinking of in order would be Mike S., Bill C., John G., Bill B., Mike H., if I had to guess one of these five Superbowl winning coachs currently unemployed would be our next HC, no later than next year.

Just my thought. If things don't work out for the Z man in DC, which by the way I don't happen to think they will beyond this season, best case.

IMO I don't think Mike H. would be the guy, Dan would like to have here as his next HC. The other Mike (Shanny) whole different ball game.[/quote]

Sorry, I meant if we were bringing Holmgren's thoughts on qb's into this discussion, not bringing him in as a headcoach.

I really am still confident that JZ will be here next year.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=DBUCHANON101;593725]Im sorry but i have to give credit to anybody that can beat pittsburgh with wrs named Knox,Bennett and Hester with a running game that was nonexistant.
But like you said, it doesnt matter now.[/quote]

And it's only his first year in THE SYSTEM. Just wait until year 3. That's when things will really start to click for Cutler;)

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;595666]Well if we are bringing Holmgren in, remember [URL="http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/05/08/all-eyes-on-jason-campbell-in-dc/"]his thoughts on JC[/URL]:[/quote]

Wow, was he way off on Flacco. What a knob.

Re: Cutler Sucks Donkey
 

[quote=saden1;593693]He'll give you 3500+ yards, and 20 TDs and 18 INTs. Nothing special about Cutler whatsoever and he is certainly not better than JC.

When I upgrade, I upgrade to first class not from one business class seat to another business class seat. You dig?[/quote]

While I'm not completely convinced that JC is better than Cutler, I agree he's too much of a risk and we're having a hard enough time offensively without giving up 4int in games!!