![]() |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Mattyk;674349]Relax bro he was just trying to show you the ropes. This time of year especially things can get a little cluttered up around here with multiple threads on the same topics. We're just trying to keep things organized. Try to understand if everyone who doesn't visit here often just pops in and posts what they want, regardless of what is already being discussed, the regulars here can get a little testy. It's all good, [B]let's keep it classy[/B].[/quote]
Like San Diego! |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=GusFrerotte;674335]I was against getting Bradford on the account of his being on a powerful team that to me, with the exception of a couple of games, played clearly inferior opponents most of the year in a conference not known for defense. THat being said, one thing other than arm strength that I want in a franchise guy for the SKins is a guy with a brain. Bradford scored a 36 on his Wonderlic test. Clausen only scored 23, and Tebow a 22. I would like to see what Stull and Kafka scored on theirs as both of their schools(Pitt and Northwestern) usually have some of the highest academic standards for athletes around.[/quote]
I found it noteworthy in one of your earlier posts you refered to Bradford as a potential FQB...potential...being the key word. I mention it because many times the term FQB is thrown around too losely when it pertains to collegiate QB's. FQB means accomplished, without accomplishment on the NFL level the title does not properly apply notwithstanding success on a lesser level. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=The Goat;674358]And we're still waiting on him to develop pocket presence...I have a feeling he doesn't ever get there.[/quote]
He's still waiting for the team to develop a pocket for him to have presence in! |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Buster;674481]He's still waiting for the team to develop a pocket for him to have presence in![/quote]
:laughing- No s**t. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
maybe it's just me but i believe the Redskins should draft a OT with the fourth pick because the OL class usually drops off after the first 2 rounds
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=duetsch215;674587]maybe it's just me but i believe the Redskins should draft a OT with the fourth pick because the OL class usually drops off after the first 2 rounds[/quote]
Exactly. They need to use Rounds ONE AND TWO on tackles. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
anyone remember bruce eugene from grambling??? he was like 5'9 and 250lbs and he scored a 41!!! i remember watching grambling and someone else on nbc, it was a traditional game between two of the black colleges in the south and this dude could sling the ball as good as anyone i'd ever seen. seriously..he was a short fat ass but man could be throw the ball. i wonder what ever happened to him??
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=skinsfan69;674637]anyone remember bruce eugene from grambling??? he was like 5'9 and 250lbs and he scored a 41!!! i remember watching grambling and someone else on nbc, it was a traditional game between two of the black colleges in the south and this dude could sling the ball as good as anyone i'd ever seen. seriously..he was a short fat ass but man could be throw the ball. i wonder what ever happened to him??[/quote]
I remember him he was like 270 lbs wasn't he? He bounced around many leagues, NFL, CFL, NFL Europa, etc. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
Was there ever a reason give for Bradford to not participate in his Pro Day?
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Chico23231;674678]Was there ever a reason give for Bradford to not participate in his Pro Day?[/quote]
Maybe it's the same reason Dwayne Jarrett gave for not attending the combine. Quote " I knew I was going Pro." |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=joethiesmanfan;674684]Maybe it's the same reason Dwayne Jarrett gave for not attending the combine. Quote " I knew I was going Pro."[/quote]
Is that the 2nd round bust you refering too? ha thats what im kinda worried about... |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Chico23231;674678]Was there ever a reason give for Bradford to not participate in his Pro Day?[/quote]
[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft10/news/story?id=4990223]Sam Bradford reschedules pro day for NFL personnel - ESPN[/url] |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
^thanks for the update Matty
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
Isn't this entire discussion somewhat moot. Every prognosticator on the air has St. Louis taking Bradford at 1. Is there any chance in hell that he would fall all the way to 4 with both St. Louis and Tampa in front of us? Doesn't seem likely to me. I think we'll get Okung at 4 and pick up McCoy at 36, with a draft day trade for a mid-2nd round pick to land another OT.
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
I agree, I rather draft an offensive lineman personally.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.