Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=53Fan;679004]We could always sign Jason Taylor again![/quote]

It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Marshall in a heartbeat...gotta be like 10 years younger!

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;679008]It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.[/quote]

If you show pass rushing skills, you're immediately in his doghouse. I'm pretty stoked about seeing the defense cut loose this year.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

T.O. will always be a Cowgirl to me, reminds me of Michael Irvin...I can't stand the guy....every time we touch that teams' players we get hexed.
It's really simple....stay away from anyone ever associated to the Cowboys....PERIOD...they are the ENEMY.

Brandon Marshall is fine, but trading anything for him is NOT.
If we trade for someone, it should be for a starting LT.
That is all I have to say about that.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Zerohero;678780]As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles[/quote]


Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;679016]Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.[/quote]

Yeah i don't want either, just if we had to pick one.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;679016]Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.[/quote]

Still 829 yards with Ryan Fitzgerald as your QB is pretty impressive, especially for a guy with as much mileage as T.O.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

neither...and here is why

1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp)
2) why not develop our own receivers?
3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing
4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does.

This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Neither, develop the one's we have if possible.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I would rather have T.O! Marshall is way to expensive.