Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=GTripp0012;814292]Don't forget: all this FA activity is still an elaborate ruse to tank the season. Rabach is really the only piece that is required to do so.[/quote]

funniest thing i've seen today

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=skinsfan69;814232]The Redskins offically have a hard on for wr's.[/quote]

Last year R/B this year W/R...same order of disposal, waiting for the impact signing.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

oh well lol No edwards

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

why is everyone in such an uproar over WR's .. yeah we drafted some "potential" talent .. how has that worked out for us over the last decade ? Are you kidding me. Gaffney is not Joey Galloway, he played nice last year and i'm sorry but was Jarmon "lighting" it up ? Wouldn't you rather have a crop of WR's that you can actually CUT because you have talent instead of picking up arena league guys before week 1. No offense to AA.

Moss
AA
Hankerson
Gaffney
Stallworth or Kelly is cut
Banks

Austin - PS

What's the problem here ?

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=DCtoAZ;814324]why is everyone in such an uproar over WR's .. yeah we drafted some "potential" talent .. how has that worked out for us over the last decade ? Are you kidding me. Gaffney is not Joey Galloway, he played nice last year and i'm sorry but was Jarmon "lighting" it up ? Wouldn't you rather have a crop of WR's that you can actually CUT because you have talent instead of picking up arena league guys before week 1. No offense to AA.

Moss
AA
Hankerson
Gaffney
Stallworth or Kelly is cut
Banks

Austin - PS

What's the problem here ?[/quote]Well, you've released three Shanahan draft picks between the 2010 and 2011 drafts for guys like Gaffney and Stallworth.

If that's not a problem to you, then there is no rebuilding occurring. The future is indeed now. Beck to the future.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Peter King likes the move...

"Peter King
Love the Gaffney trade for Washington. Sure-handed possession guy, excellent route-runner. Brady loved him."

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=DCtoAZ;814324]why is everyone in such an uproar over WR's .. yeah we drafted some "potential" talent .. how has that worked out for us over the last decade ? Are you kidding me. Gaffney is not Joey Galloway, he played nice last year and i'm sorry but was Jarmon "lighting" it up ? Wouldn't you rather have a crop of WR's that you can actually CUT because you have talent instead of picking up arena league guys before week 1. No offense to AA.

Moss
AA
Hankerson
Gaffney
Stallworth or Kelly is cut
Banks

Austin - PS

What's the problem here ?[/quote]

Cut Stallworth AND Kelly, Austin makes the team...Niles Paul to PS.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Niles Paul will make a more durable kick returner.
Cut Banks.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Gaffney will make this team, be our slot

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=DCtoAZ;814324]why is everyone in such an uproar over WR's .. yeah we drafted some "potential" talent .. how has that worked out for us over the last decade ? Are you kidding me. Gaffney is not Joey Galloway, he played nice last year and i'm sorry but was Jarmon "lighting" it up ? Wouldn't you rather have a crop of WR's that you can actually CUT because you have talent instead of picking up arena league guys before week 1. No offense to AA.

Moss
AA
Hankerson
Gaffney
Stallworth or Kelly is cut
Banks

Austin - PS

What's the problem here ?[/quote]

Paul and Robinson are PS or throw away DP's?? The field is becoming much too crowded for reps. No way all these guys can get a good look.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=Longtimefan;814346]Paul and Robinson are PS or throw away DP's?? The field is becoming much too crowded for reps. No way all these guys can get a good look.[/quote]

Unfortunately, the lockout may have caused this. I was hoping Paul would make the team, but I had not thought of the lack of time they've been able to put in. The season starts in 6 weeks. They arrived at Redskins Park YESTERDAY.

Vets may be the way to go because of the lockout, but it's a shame we can't retain these young WRs with potential. Maybe we'll keep 2 on the PS and promote them with cuts/injuries later in the season when they get caught up.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

this move is surprising. gaffney is decent, more of a possession receiver i think, but jarmon didnt fit in the 3-4.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Rookies are gonna struggle, big time, at least early on in the season. Not sure we can expect much from the likes of Hankerson or anyone else. And even the 2nd year guys lost valuable development time this offseason. I think we're looking for guys who can play now. And if that means cutting some picks or putting them on the PS so be it.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Maybe we are going back to the "old Ball Coach" days Fun 'N' Gun and F&ck O line.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Not sure we needed yet another WR but if Jarmon did not fit into our plans why not get someone who was productive last year and someone we can also cut at no expense?