![]() |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
^ i was figuring denver would be making a hige play for one of the top two in this draft
|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=SmootSmack;872771]Well, this just in. Broncos looking like a sleeper team preparing an offer to move to #2 for the chance to get RGIII. Biggest competition likely the Browns who can probably offer more.[/quote]
Well this blows. So much for picking up Sam Bradford. Oh well, I'm sure FO interest in him would have waned in a few weeks anyway... |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
Our QB priority:
1. Luck 2. Bradford 3. RG3 |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=mbedner3420;872774]Well this blows. So much for picking up Sam Bradford. Oh well, I'm sure FO interest in him would have waned in a few weeks anyway...[/quote]
Dude, shit changes faster than you can sneeze in the NFL. I think there's a good chance the Skins will get their man or men, whomever that is. Cash is always king. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=30gut;872736]Thanks for the info, I'm a bit surprised by the view of Jones as more of an immediate starter then Tannehill though.
There is no dount that Tannehill lacks experience but he actually knows [I][B]this[/B][/I] offense because A&M runs it; this actually gives him a leg up in learning the offense especially considering that Jones comes from a spread. Tannehill isn't as inexperienced as most think and will have more snaps then Cam Newton and Mark Sanchez both of whom were day 1 starters. There's as much to suggest that he could be a day 1 or midseason as their is to suggest that he needs to sit for a season.[/quote]I think Landry Jones could start day one in Kyle's offense because I don't think Kyle's offense requires the quarterback to have a great grasp of coverages to complete passes down the field. The biggest Landry Jones problem is how much his accuracy suffers when he is pressured. I mean, every quarterback's accuracy suffers when pressured, but when Jones can stand back and deliver the football, he's really accurate. When he has to move, he has awful fundamentals. Right now, Landry Jones lacks even the ability to buy an extra half second to get rid of the ball. Which should be worrisome. I still think he's a much better fit than Tannehill. Kyle requires a passer with superior pocket mechanics. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=SmootSmack;872771]Well, this just in. Broncos looking like a sleeper team preparing an offer to move to #2 for the chance to get RGIII. Biggest competition likely the Browns who can probably offer more.[/quote]
I just can't see anyone having the ammo that the Browns have to move up in the draft. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
To be clear, getting Bradford was always going to be a tough putt.
|
[QUOTE=SmootSmack;872771]Well, this just in. Broncos looking like a sleeper team preparing an offer to move to #2 for the chance to get RGIII. Biggest competition likely the Browns who can probably offer more.[/QUOTE]
The Tebow lovefest is over and they're not even eliminated from the playoffs? |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=12thMan;872776]Dude, shit changes faster than you can sneeze in the NFL. I think there's a good chance the Skins will get their man or men, whomever that is. Cash is always king.[/quote]
No, I know it does. Which is why I don't put much stock into us getting Bradford. 1) It'll become too costly (when you can only deal in picks and players), 2) (as you stated) things change quickly in the NFL. They'll be uninterested in Bradford in a few weeks just as their interest in Sanchez quickly deminished. They'll get their man, but it might not necessarily be the flavor of this week. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
I don't see how the broncos can just go up and offer more than us, being that their in the playoffs, and we aren't. The broncos could be picking in the late 20's when its all said and done. Do they REALLY think their a QB away from being a contender? I can find 5 areas on their team that they could use some up grading on their DT's, MLB, FS, CB, G, T.
|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=Chico23231;872775]Our QB priority:
1. Luck 2. Bradford 3. RG3[/quote] 1. Not going to happen. 2. Not going to happen. 3. Not going to happen. I hope they've got a Plan D. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
Damn, it's January 3rd and I'm already exhausted. We're going to do this for the next 4 months, aren't we?
|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=Paintrain;872788]Damn, it's January 3rd and I'm already exhausted. We're going to do this for the next 4 months, aren't we?[/quote]
Yup... :party-smi |
I'd be shocked if the colts took RG
|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=mooby;872781]The Tebow lovefest is over and they're not even eliminated from the playoffs?[/quote]
LOL, i know i agree thats kinda shitty, but, Elway never said he had his qb of the future, in fact he said the opposite, so Im not surprised, tebow wont be on the broncos next year. barring a SB win. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.