Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=NC_Skins;905085]
*McNabb Quotes*[/quote]

Wow. Do you have an axe to grind Sir McNabb? Oh I do but I don't.

Now I understand part of the reason Eagle fans wanted him gone.

I wonder what QB would work under Shanahan. According to McNabb we've already eliminated Manning and RG3 as possible candidates to successfully run our offense.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=Dirtbag59;905098]Wow. Do you have an axe to grind Sir McNabb? Oh I do but I don't.

Now I understand part of the reason Eagle fans wanted him gone.

I wonder what QB would work under Shanahan. According to McNabb we've already eliminated Manning and RG3 as possible candidates to successfully run our offense.[/quote]

Maybe McNabb believes the best offense for the Shanaplan is a qb-less one. Seriously though McNabb just sounds like he's still upset about his time here. Someone should tell him to man up.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=PWNED;904925]i see rg3 having a lesser career than stafford (this is being objectve). stafford obviously has the far superior arm and just overall looks like a sexy beast.[/quote]

I can't really tell whether your trying to make serious contributions to a discussion here?? I hope not...

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=PWNED;904925]i see rg3 having a lesser career than stafford (this is being objectve). stafford obviously has the far superior arm and just overall looks like a sexy beast.[/quote]

I thought you were the sexy beast? You know Stafford lusts for you and Megatron wants to make you his boy toy ... and you know you would love it.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=PWNED;904925]i see rg3 having a lesser career than stafford (this is being objectve). stafford obviously has the far superior arm and just overall looks like a sexy beast.[/quote]

I see you becoming the '[I]duty court jester[/I]' on WP but resigning in tears after a day or so.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=The Goat;905118]I can't really tell whether your trying to make serious contributions to a discussion here?? I hope not...[/quote]

my hilarious jokes are often tinged with fact and knowledgeable discussion and points. fact is, stafford arm >>>>>>>>>>>>> RGIIIs

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=RedskinRat;905147]I see you becoming the '[I]duty court jester[/I]' on WP but resigning in tears after a day or so.[/quote]

hahaha im quite comfortable who i am. if youll notice i do have outstanding points on anything redskins-related (obviously anything lions related, i have sources)

just WAIT until i predict something thats going to happen for the lions.

youll have to start an entire thread just to say how awesome i am. but dont, because i already know.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=The Goat;905118]I can't really tell whether your trying to make serious contributions to a discussion here?? I hope not...[/quote]

Of course he's serious, he's a Lions fan.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=PWNED;904925]i see rg3 having a lesser career than stafford (this is being objectve). stafford obviously has the far superior arm and just overall looks like a sexy beast.[/quote]

Stafford has Megatron. That's going to make him better than a lot of QBs.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

one player does not a WR corps make.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=PWNED;905241]one player does not a WR corps make.[/quote]

Well Megatron accounted for 33% of Stafford's passing yards and 39% of TDs. I would say that is pretty significant. Not taking away anything from Stafford, but RG3 will not have anything resembling Megatron in terms of WRs here in Washington.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

I feel like talking/responding to Stafford's big fan is a bad idea...but we're all free to do as we please ;)

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

If you are going to give up what we did to get RG III, you better try and tinker with the present offense at least a tad to play to his athleticism somewhat, without trying to get him to try and be a Vick type player, as that would be disasterous. Throw in some bootlegs, more play action, etc. I think McNabb on ESPN was mostly sour grapes, but I think he did make a good point about the Shannys making a potential mistake not trying to revamp the system a bit to play on RG III's strengths.

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

if mcnabb retired in jake plummer fashion, his "legacy" would have been much better off. of course mcnabb has sour grapes

Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better?
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;905369]If you are going to give up what we did to get RG III, you better try and tinker with the present offense at least a tad to play to his athleticism somewhat, without trying to get him to try and be a Vick type player, as that would be disasterous. Throw in some bootlegs, more play action, etc. I think McNabb on ESPN was mostly sour grapes, but I think he did make a good point about the Shannys making a potential mistake not trying to revamp the system a bit to play on RG III's strengths.[/quote]

McNutts is an idiot, he's more mad at us than the shegles they traded you anyone with sense would be mad at them first IMO. You went to the ViQueens basically the same system you ran in Philly blunt and still looked like SH*T that proved MS & KS so right IMO.