Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Ill tell ya what Chico. Go out this weekend and give it a whirl. Start talking to women like shit. Start treating them like shit. Let me know how that works out for ya. Bring a change of clothes though because your going to get a drink to the face. [emoji106]
And society is the fucked up one because a guy tweets one sentence about women. So if i tweeted “black people like to be in gangs” should society be scoffed at for calling me a racist? Or no?

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Oh, so the issue is Guice is treating woman (women) like shit?

Or did he just say something immature or/and off handed...maybe even emotional? Because I cant see that at 21 years of age.

I shouldn't give context...because to most context would clarify...who others it often clouds a bias premise.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1195787]I dont know how to take you seriously anymore.[/quote]

If we were to go down the list of classics that I haven't seen, I may be kicked off the site.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1195795]Oh, so the issue is Guice is treating woman (women) like shit?



Or did he just say something immature or/and off handed...maybe even emotional? Because I cant see that at 21 years of age.



I shouldn't give context...because to most context would clarify...who others it often clouds a bias premise.[/QUOTE]



No the issue is him saying they like to be treated like shit. And for the record am i calling for him to be punished or put to death? Because that is how you are acting. He is 21 not 11. He has a larger audience on Twitter than most. It was a morally corrupt statement to make. He should apologize to the women who do not like to be treated like shit. My daughter wife and mother are three i can think of off hand.
Not sure why people who have a problem with it trigger you but the actual tweet is no biggie? Weird.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=punch it in;1195797]No the issue is him saying they like to be treated like shit. And for the record am i calling for him to be punished or put to death? Because that is how you are acting. He is 21 not 11. He has a larger audience on Twitter than most. [B]It was a morally corrupt statement to make[/B]. He should apologize to the women who do not like to be treated like shit. My daughter wife and mother are three i can think of off hand.
Not sure why people who have a problem with it trigger you but the actual tweet is no biggie? Weird.[/quote]

Guice is morally corrupt. Well that's just great, I wanted us to draft a lead back, but we picked the morally corrupt guy...

one sentence folks...then stereotype the person how you want while making a judgment on their character. This is a great world.

Well I know your daughter, wife and mother are just heart broken by Guice statement....are they seeking therapy?

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1195798]Guice is morally corrupt. Well that's just great, I wanted us to draft a lead back, but we picked the morally corrupt guy...



one sentence folks...then stereotype the person how you want while making a judgment on their character. This is a great world.



Well I know your daughter, wife and mother are just heart broken by Guice statement....are they seeking therapy?[/QUOTE]



There you go again. You actually quoted the statement i made that said IT WAS A MORALLY CORRUPT STATEMENT. Did I say Guice was morally corrupt? Did I? No. You are a spin artist my friend.
I will ask you again, if a 21 year old white NFL player tweeted “black people like to be in gangs” would you try and put that into context? Or would you call it a morally corrupt statement?

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=punch it in;1195799]There you go again. You actually quoted the statement i made that said IT WAS A MORALLY CORRUPT STATEMENT. Did I say Guice was morally corrupt? Did I? No. You are a spin artist my friend.
I will ask you again, if a 21 year old white NFL player tweeted “black people like to be in gangs” would you try and put that into context? Or would you call it a morally corrupt statement?[/quote]

Oh geez, here comes the race card again!

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

You are arguing that a kid can tweet something and not actually mean it but in the same breath you are telling me I cannot have a problem with the statement and not the person. Because that is clearly what you are doing by twisting my words.

Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=metalskins;1195800]Oh geez, here comes the race card again![/QUOTE]



Really? Or am i drawing a comparison between a disparaging statement towards women and a disparaging statement towards blacks?
Nice try though.
Let me guess you were also attacked by a gang who of women who like to be treated like shit ...

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Sorry for using so much logic. I feel like im pouring salt on snails.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Your logic is sound Punch no doubt about that....so much that I learned I can make morally corrupt statements and still be morally upstanding.

Brother, I’m gonna pray for the wounded souls and spirits of your mother, wife and daughter that somehow they can recover from Guices statement.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Meks;1195782]in my initial post i clarified that the tweet isnt cool, period. The simple point i was making is that [B][U]plenty[/U][/B] of girls tend to go for the "bad boys" and guys who may not be so nice to them. Not all girls, just some. Nice guys finish last, sometimes. That's it, lol. Giantone just got upset cuz it touched his sensitive nerves and he didn't wanna take a joke about being feminine. :-)[/quote]


The definition of plenty = a [B]large[/B] or sufficient amount or quantity; [B]more than enough[/B]:
So in your paragraph above you first say (plenty= meaning a large amount) of women like bad guys. Then in the next sentence you say 'not all, just some.'

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=punch it in;1195802]Really? Or am i drawing a comparison between a disparaging statement towards women and a disparaging statement towards blacks?
Nice try though.
Let me guess you were also attacked by a gang who of women who like to be treated like shit ...[/quote]

Oh, I see, according to your morality, it's OK to make disparaging jokes toward me. This comes after you being all preachy about being a decent person and not making statements about someone or a group of people that is wrong. Sounds like you're OK with you judging other people, but God forbid anyone else does it, otherwise, they are morally bankrupt. You either practice what you preach or STFU.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Defensewins;1195804]The definition of plenty = a [B]large[/B] or sufficient amount or quantity; [B]more than enough[/B]:
So in your paragraph above you first say (plenty= meaning a large amount) of women like bad guys. Then in the next sentence you say 'not all, just some.'[/quote]

lets not get into semantics there Webster.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1195805]Your logic is sound Punch no doubt about that....so much that I learned I can make morally corrupt statements and still be morally upstanding.



Brother, I’m gonna pray for the wounded souls and spirits of your mother, wife and daughter that somehow they can recover from Guices statement.[/QUOTE]



Chico man you are all over the map. You are the one who said Guice made a mistake- that it was one sentence- that u r clarifying and putting it into context. I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. There are words and there are actions. For all I know Guice spends his days off holding doors open for women and helping them across the street. Why can you give him the benefit of the doubt but i cant? Does refusing to admit it was a shitty, immoral, lousy thing to say somehow allow you to do that? People make mistakes. That tweet was a big mistake imo. Im not calling for the death sentence but you are acting like he told a harmless little knock knock joke.
Yea Chico a person can say something immoral but still have morals. I dont know Guice so maybe he is an absolute asshole. Maybe he aint. Im discussing his tweet. Not trying to draw lifelong conclusions on the guy. And i never did.