Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

Since we're just chatting here...an off-topic tidbit:

The Miami Herald reported today that Oakland was the third team interested in Ramsey but their interest doesn't appear to be as strong as Miami or the Jets.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=Huddle]Since we're just chatting here...an off-topic tidbit:

The Miami Herald reported today that Oakland was the third team interested in Ramsey but their interest doesn't appear to be as strong as Miami or the Jets.[/QUOTE]

yeah, i think a lot of people figured they'd be interested... that tsioptsoipto kid they got is terrible and collins is too expensive for them.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]The ADE has been in the league too long and as such, his vet min salary can't compete with the 235k vet min salaries that the rookies are offering.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, unfortunately he may be a cap casualty. He is a great special teamer. I'd like to see him stay.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

if no one restructures, we're looking at fielding a 47 man roster next year. yikes.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]if no one restructures, we're looking at fielding a 47 man roster next year. yikes.[/QUOTE]

Yup, about 40% of whom are rookies.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

Well now, isn't this [URL=http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6270]interesting[/URL]

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=Ramseyfan]Yup, about 40% of whom are rookies.[/QUOTE]

34/47 = 72.34% 1st year rookies ;)

as opposed to the more elusive 2nd year rookie types.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]Well now, isn't this [url="http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6270"]interesting[/url][/QUOTE]

yay, that means we can keep samuels and maybe washington and only have 32 rookies on our 47 man team!

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]34/47 = 72.34% 1st year rookies ;)

as opposed to the more elusive 2nd year rookie types.[/QUOTE]

I guess I didn't realize we needed that many rookies to get under the cap. I thought the number was closer to 20.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

A lot of us owe Brunell (most notably myself, for starting this thread based on the WP article) a gigantic "thank you....I'm sorry."

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

SORRY MARK. Please reread my apology note I wrote last year. :(

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

offiss is going to apoligize?

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=Ramseyfan]I guess I didn't realize we needed that many rookies to get under the cap. I thought the number was closer to 20.[/QUOTE]

articles have been stating that, but if we cut all 56 players that would save us money and replaced them with 1st year guys, we'd still be 1.4million over the cap (its that bad). That's why the who would you cut thread was a fool's errand.

if there are more restructures or a new cba it won't be so horrible though.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]SORRY MARK. Please reread my apology note I wrote last year. :([/QUOTE]

Goes for me too.

Re: Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal
 

Anyone know how much space we saved?