Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

is this even a debate...wtf...this thread should be closed we all know Monk is better, and no one in the media is gonna accept it...old news...

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE]Don Maynard-Joe Namath. Also, in 1960 and 61 his head coach was none other than Sammy Baugh and Maynard too was the proud recipient of Dick Wood passes. On a side note, looking at his numbers Joe Namath doesn't belong in the HOF. Is he in simply because of a guarantee?
[/QUOTE]

Actually I believe he was put in the HOF because he bagged more broads than any player in the history of the NFL.:pimp:

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE=wolfeskins]just read a king article were he says he has recieved 16 million e-mails from people saying monk should be in the hall.

so i sent king an e-mail, it says "why is it that 16 million people think monk should be in the HoF but you disagree ? you need to get over your grudge aginst the skins and give monk what he deserves, a place in the hall".[/QUOTE]

I think King may have been using an old literary technique we like to call "hyperbole," (i.e. exaggeration for the point of emphasis.)

If not, I feel really bad for the IT guys who had to fix the email servers after SI got nailed with 16 million + emails in one day.

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE=offiss]Actually I believe he was put in the HOF because he bagged more broads than any player in the history of the NFL.:pimp:[/QUOTE]

Don't I get a "thank you" for putting this together for you? My feelings are hurt now

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]Ok guyz I tought I should post this linked I posted a thrend in a Cowboys board about the same topic I just tought you like to see the reactio nof other Cowboys fans.......

[URL="http://www.cowboysboard.com/"]http://www.cowboysboard.com/[/URL]

Is in Dallas Cowboys discussion under Irvin vs Monk[/QUOTE]

Well I gotta give your guys over there some credit - that was a surprisingly intelligent and balanced discussion.

That should be the ultimate in proof for King - the fact that even the Dallas Cowboys fans, the most hated rivals of the Redskins, actually believe Monk should go in before or at least at the same time as Irvin. Doesn't get any more clear than that.

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

Yeah I was also suprised with the response of other board members, and I agree if your more hated rivals can agree that he should go in I believe that's the ultimate test

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]Don't I get a "thank you" for putting this together for you? My feelings are hurt now[/QUOTE]


Thank You!:cheeky-sm

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[quote=mheisig]I think King may have been using an old literary technique we like to call "hyperbole," (i.e. exaggeration for the point of emphasis.)

If not, I feel really bad for the IT guys who had to fix the email servers after SI got nailed with 16 million + emails in one day.[/quote]


yea, i'm sure he was saying it in exageration. i just felt it was great material to use against him in the form of a question about monk and the hof.

Re: Art Monk vs Michael Irvin
 

[QUOTE=mheisig]Well I gotta give your guys over there some credit - that was a surprisingly intelligent and balanced discussion.

That should be the ultimate in proof for King - the fact that even the Dallas Cowboys fans, the most hated rivals of the Redskins, actually believe Monk should go in before or at least at the same time as Irvin. Doesn't get any more clear than that.[/QUOTE]

Email the link to PK..../blink/