Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Cedric Benson arrested (and now released) (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=23436)

MTK 06-12-2008 08:43 AM

re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=GTripp0012;452486]From a personnel standpoint, Benson was far from a Bust.

In 2006, he was worth more value per play than Thomas Jones. That allowed the Bears to deal TJ, who has yet to have a season in NY as good as his weakest in his 3 yrs in Chicago.

I think everyone would have struggled behind the Bears OL in 2007. Benson was exceptionally bad, and I'm not excusing his level of poorness just in the same way I don't excuse Portis' level of poorness last year. Of course, if you asked anyone, Bears fans even, who is better: Portis or Benson -- the answer would be Portis 10 out of 10 times. Though both struggled in 2007 after a similar amount of carries in 2006 and a similar level of success.

The point here is this: Benson is not a Bear anymore for purely character reasons, and even though his most recent season sucked, it's safe to say he would have rebounded. Cedric Benson is not a particularly intelligent person, and that may have led to multiple arrests in the same city within a month of each other.

That's certainly not a black mark on Morrocco Brown, especially considering that Jerry Angelo is a horrible evaluator of offensive skill.[/quote]

Benson isn't a bust yet, just a dud. Though I don't see him ever becoming a top back in this league.

I still don't agree with your take on Portis having poor production last year. He and Benson don't even belong in the same discussion.

SmootSmack 06-12-2008 09:23 AM

re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[QUOTE=GTripp0012;452486]Portis or Benson -- the answer would be Portis 10 out of 10 times. Though both struggled in 2007 after a similar amount of carries in 2006 and a similar level of success.[/QUOTE]

I don't understand this statement. It makes no sense to me. Portis played half a season in 2006

GMScud 06-12-2008 01:22 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=SmootSmack;452517]I don't understand this statement. It makes no sense to me. Portis played half a season in 2006[/quote]

I'm reading it as Portis struggled a bit on 07 (his ypc were lower than normal, but 1600+ total yds and 11tds is damn good), and he and Benson had similar numbers in 06- similar # of carries, yards, and both had a 4.1ypc avg).

SmootSmack 06-12-2008 01:33 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[QUOTE=GMScud;452591]I'm reading it as Portis struggled a bit on 07 (his ypc were lower than normal, but 1600+ total yds and 11tds is damn good), and he and Benson had similar numbers in 06- similar # of carries, yards, and both had a 4.1ypc avg).[/QUOTE]

Ok, but shouldn't you factor in number of games played in 2006?

GMScud 06-12-2008 01:38 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=SmootSmack;452596]Ok, but shouldn't you factor in number of games played in 2006?[/quote]

I suppose. Benson played in 7 more games, but as Thomas Jones' backup. Benson had 30 more carries than CP in '06, of course due to injury.

MTK 06-12-2008 02:36 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=SmootSmack;452596]Ok, but shouldn't you factor in number of games played in 2006?[/quote]

I would say so since one would have to believe if Portis had played a full season he would have easily topped Benson's numbers.

GMScud 06-12-2008 02:55 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=Mattyk72;452603]I would say so since one would have to believe if Portis had played a full season he would have easily topped Benson's numbers.[/quote]

Oh for sure. But I think the comparison is flawed since Benson was a backup.

GTripp0012 06-12-2008 09:17 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=SmootSmack;452517]I don't understand this statement. It makes no sense to me. Portis played half a season in 2006[/quote]Yeah, and he was a lot more valuable per play in 2006 than in 2007.

I'm assuming that if he had not broke his hand in 2006, his season would look a lot better than this past season on paper.

Anyway, the point is that if instead of being the character guy he is, if he had gotten arrested twice this offseason, we might have released CP instead of given him an extension. That is to say that Benson's character issues derailed his career way faster than his poor play did.

It wasn't a particually strong comparison, just a "what if Benson was on the Redskins" sort of thing.

GTripp0012 06-12-2008 09:27 PM

Re: Cedric Benson arrested (and now released)
 
[quote=Mattyk72;452603]I would say so since one would have to believe if Portis had played a full season he would have easily topped Benson's numbers.[/quote]Right...except that's missing the point.

The reasons their 06 seasons were comprable is because Benson and Portis had a similar amount of carries. Portis did miss 7 games, but he still saw nearly as many carries as Benson and they were both rather effective in those carries.

Both carried the load significantly more the following year, with much less success.

The point I was trying to make here is that CP is the better player, though their running stats are similar. The reason that everyone knows CP is better and will bounce back from 2007's high fumble/low YPC is because he's a hard worker, and he's done it before.

I can't comment on CedBens work ethic, but his arrests suggest a player that doesn't learn from his mistakes, and frankly isn't very bright. Meanwhile, the Redskins like Portis enough to give him a massive extension.

I don't know if I was making a point, but if it was, it's that character directly translates to millions of dollars in the NFL.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.91882 seconds with 9 queries