Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   2009 Free Agents (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=27648)

tryfuhl 04-25-2009 10:52 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=GridIron26;550152][URL="http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/04/25/qb-cassel-chiefs-reach-agreement-on-new-six-year-deal/"]NFL.com Blogs » Blog Archive Chiefs, QB Cassel agree on six-year deal «[/URL]

KC looks like they basically penciled Cassell as QB starter - I really do like Thipgen, he makes mistakes but he learns from them.. He could blossom if given a chance..[/quote]
Was nearly a given.

tryfuhl 04-25-2009 10:52 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Ruhskins;548472]Well that's what they deserve (Cincy) for not moving him earlier. Cincy knew they were going to lose either CJ or TJ; I don't understand why they didn't get rid of CJ when teams were interested in him and he wanted to leave. That organization needs to implode and get a new FO and coach. For all of you that cry about the Redskins being in a bad situation, well guess what, there are teams in terrible situations and Cincy is one of them.[/quote]
They wanted to not set a precedent for allowing players to demand trades; heh, you reap what you sow.

Lotus 04-25-2009 11:33 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
I can't find a link yet but NFLN reported that, in the wake of drafting Curry, they have taken the franchise tag away from LB Leroy Hill. This makes him an unrestricted free agent.

JGisLordOfTheRings 04-25-2009 11:37 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
^^^this was on NFLN also.

I think it would be a decent pickup but he would def want big money.
He led the Seattle D in tackles last year so....

Lotus 04-26-2009 12:13 AM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
In the wake of tackles taken high in the draft, we might find the Bungles releasing Levi Jones, as The Goat has very helpfully indicated several times. The Jags may release Tony Pashos. And the Giants may release one of their many OT's. We may find free agent help at RT which is a better bet than Mike Williams.

Superman13732 04-26-2009 12:17 AM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=JGisLordOfTheRings;550721]^^^this was on NFLN also.

I think it would be a decent pickup but he would def want big money.
He led the Seattle D in tackles last year so....[/quote]

Wait, is a RFA or UFA? And i think the one thing the skins have proven to us over the years, the FO may not know how to put together a winning football team, but they sure as hell know how to play with the salary cap, so i don't see money being an issue.

Lotus 04-26-2009 12:32 AM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Superman13732;550740]Wait, is a RFA or UFA? And i think the one thing the skins have proven to us over the years, the FO may not know how to put together a winning football team, but they sure as hell know how to play with the salary cap, so i don't see money being an issue.[/quote]

UFA. He was franchised but they removed the tag, making him an UFA.

GMScud 04-28-2009 12:43 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
Oh my God! Oh my God! The Jets cut Marcus Mason! Rumor has it Redskins One has just landed at JFK in NY. Yes! ;)

Ruhskins 04-28-2009 12:47 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=GMScud;552420]Oh my God! Oh my God! The Jets cut Marcus Mason! Rumor has it Redskins One has just landed at JFK in NY. Yes! ;)[/quote]

What? I thought he'd be a starter by now? LOL.

Stuck in TX 04-28-2009 07:34 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8100c073&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true]Cardinals cut veteran RB James; CB Hood, DE/LB LaBoy also out[/url]

Cardinals cut James. Maybe the Broncos will pick him up. They are dangerously low on RB's...

(sarcasm at its finest)

Lotus 04-28-2009 07:59 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Stuck in TX;552680][url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8100c073&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true]Cardinals cut veteran RB James; CB Hood, DE/LB LaBoy also out[/url]

Cardinals cut James. Maybe the Broncos will pick him up. They are dangerously low on RB's...

(sarcasm at its finest)[/quote]

Can LaBoy start at linebacker?

Those of you jonesing for more backfield help, do we want the Edge?

GridIron26 04-28-2009 08:21 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Lotus;552686][B]Can LaBoy start at linebacker?[/B]

Those of you jonesing for more backfield help, do we want the Edge?[/quote]

I wondered about same thing when I first heard of this.. But then, I remembered our cap situation.. It's moot

I'm fan of Edge, he's good.. But we don't need him, we already have someone similar, Portis and Betts.. And once again, cap situation..

Superman13732 04-28-2009 09:19 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Stuck in TX;552680][url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8100c073&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true]Cardinals cut veteran RB James; CB Hood, DE/LB LaBoy also out[/url]

Cardinals cut James. Maybe the Broncos will pick him up. They are dangerously low on RB's...

(sarcasm at its finest)[/quote]

Haha how many do they have now? two dozen?

Superman13732 04-28-2009 09:22 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=GridIron26;552695]I wondered about same thing when I first heard of this.. But then, I remembered our cap situation.. It's moot

I'm fan of Edge, he's good.. But we don't need him, we already have someone similar, Portis and Betts.. And once again, cap situation..[/quote]

Edge just isn't the same runner he used to be. Look at his yards per carry since he left Indy.

WaldSkins 04-28-2009 09:37 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents
 
[quote=Lotus;552686]Can LaBoy start at linebacker?

Those of you jonesing for more backfield help, do we want the Edge?[/quote]

LaBoy can start at linebacker for about 5 games then would get injured a miss the rest of the season. We could just resign MW and get the same results.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.21312 seconds with 9 queries