Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[QUOTE=BleedBurgundy;345797]Bramlet's in Atlanta, we lost the chance to have him this year. Hindsight being 20/20, we should have cut Palmer and kept Bramlet as a 3rd qb, as it would have given us the flexibility to deal Brunell.[/QUOTE]


Dana Carvey as Jonny Carson......"I did not know that....weird, wild stuff"

As I would say....boy, that really sucks!

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

Brunell could still end up being shipped out of here. As for Palmer, he had a bad showing last night, but they may still take a risk on making a third string. A huge risk at that.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=Mattyk72;345776]A 3rd?? LOL keep dreaming.

I don't see it being any better than a 6th.[/quote]

I agree, but it's a good point - we shouldn't deal MB unless we get something substantial, and a 3rd certainly would be. He's way too valuable to us. No way Collins gets the #2 job IMO. I'm thinkin that this time the FO is being smart & setting the bar very high.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[QUOTE=12thMan;345799]Brunell could still end up being shipped out of here. As for Palmer, he had a bad showing last night, but they may still take a risk on making a third string. A huge risk at that.[/QUOTE]
I don't know if "bad" really does last night justice. That INT that he threw was God awful! Even if that linebacker hadn't been there it was still a terrible pass that had a better chance to get picked off by the cornerback than caught by the receiver.
I know it was his first time on an NFL field, but it looked like it was first time in any kind of competitive situation. I think ARE would make a better 3rd stringer for us than that.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=freddyg12;345800]I agree, but it's a good point - we shouldn't deal MB unless we get something substantial, and a 3rd certainly would be. He's way too valuable to us. No way Collins gets the #2 job IMO. I'm thinkin that this time the FO is being smart & setting the bar very high.[/quote]


I think Collins will be the number two this year.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=12thMan;345802]I think Collins will be the number two this year.[/quote]

I would be very surprised at that. I think MB solidified his spot as the #2, barring a crazy trade.

I just can't see anyone having confidence in Collins.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

If you the post or a seattle paper they are reporting that the teams were just talking, and this is not anything confirmed.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

I hope we keep Brunell. I'm fine with him being around in case Collins has to come in and he sucks. I like having two vets backing up JC. Brunell is fine as long as he doesn't have to play 4-5 games.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;345780]Looking through that Seahawks site that Hooskins linked to, I'm surprised how excited they seem to be about this.[/quote]

Everyone looks at other teams' players in a different light.

I think we tend to be way too harsh on our own players and we don't always realize what we've got.

The grass is always greener...

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=Mattyk72;345811]Everyone looks at other teams' players in a different light.

I think we tend to be way too harsh on our own players and we don't always realize what we've got.

The grass is always greener...[/quote]The roomate is a Seahawks fan. He pretty much said what we've all been saying about having MB here. That they don't have a proven backup on the roster, and acquiring him would allow them to not only improve their QB situation, but use Senaca Wallace like we use ARE.

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;345801]I don't know if "bad" really does last night justice. That INT that he threw was God awful! Even if that linebacker hadn't been there it was still a terrible pass that had a better chance to get picked off by the cornerback than caught by the receiver.
I know it was his first time on an NFL field, but it looked like it was first time in any kind of competitive situation. I think ARE would make a better 3rd stringer for us than that.[/quote]


Yeah, it was god awful now that I think about it. He sucked...but, I still hope he ends up being the third:)

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[url=http://washingtonpost.com]washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines[/url]

Here is the washington post article about it

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;345817]The roomate is a Seahawks fan. He pretty much said what we've all been saying about having MB here. That they don't have a proven backup on the roster, and acquiring him would allow them to not only improve their QB situation, but use Senaca Wallace like we use ARE.[/QUOTE]


I think you mean, "like the Steelers used ARE." :banghead:

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR2007083000944.html

hmmm add the WWW because when copy and pasted it before, it sends you to the home, ive been had by the posts cryptic code.... nyarrr

Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle
 

if it is true, i say good luck mark brunell. i don't really dislike him as a starter, he's done some good things as well as bad. the one thing mark did for us, and all loyal redskins fans, in 2005 on a monday night game. was throw not one but 2 daggers in the heart of Dallas. in less than 4 minutes and came away with a win. For that one shining moment, Mark Brunell will be considered a legend, by beating the cowpokes on monday night.. good luck mark may the road rise with u as u go