Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=doughtydoubter;671159]Hey if suh falls to us..so be it, tons of teams would live to trade up to grab him and well. .there is always teabow[/quote]


Tebow! ha ahha good one!

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=SmootSmack;671077]Would you trade Rogers and our 2nd rounder for Sproles and a 3rd? Keep in mind it would be the last pick in the 3rd round

(And keep in mind I'm just the rumor mongering messenger here)[/quote]

No way in hell I would do that. I really hope that rumor is not true. We need more picks not less. That's basically a 4th round pick and our 2nd round pick is a high #2. terrible...

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=SmootSmack;671077]Would you trade Rogers and our 2nd rounder for Sproles and a 3rd? Keep in mind it would be the last pick in the 3rd round

(And keep in mind I'm just the rumor mongering messenger here)[/quote]

That deal would be even worse than the Portis/Bailey trade in my opinion. I don't even think Vinny would have been dumb enough to do that trade and he's the guy who gave up a 2nd and a 6th for Jason Taylor. If we were to do a trade involving those players, it would have to be a straightup trade. I wouldnt even throw in a 7th rounder and i'd be inclined to insist they provide something else. Rogers may have bad hands but he does a pretty good job of shutting receviers down most of the time. He's definitely a starting corner in the league. You don't trade starting corners for #3 running backs/return men.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=tryfuhl;671068]......irony.[/quote]

........you never disapoint.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=johno;671150]Anyone think this sheds some light on who the Rams will take in the draft? Robbins is older, but might the Rams be more inclined now to take a QB? Pure speculation obviously, just wondering.[/quote]

Maybe. But I'm not sure that the Rams will think that they don't need the best DT in the draft simply because they have mediocre Robbins. I think they picked up Robbins for depth, not upgrade.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

Anyone ever notice that once a thread gets to big the last comment arrow button doesn't work anymore? This thread and Super Happy Fun thread do that.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

So whats happening right now with Foote and Willie? Are we going to sign them both.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=Lotus;671186]Maybe. But I'm not sure that the Rams will think that they don't need the best DT in the draft simply because they have mediocre Robbins. I think they picked up Robbins for depth, not upgrade.[/quote]

I liked the guy played well with 2 broken hands.The plus for the Rams is he knows the system,I think that Spags also talked to AP as well.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=mredskins;671189]Anyone ever notice that once a thread gets to big the last comment arrow button doesn't work anymore? This thread and Super Happy Fun thread do that.[/quote]

I think that means that you have post that have been deleted. It's like putting a bunch of stuff in a bag and stretching out the bag than taking things out. I mean you have less stuff in the bag but once it's stretched it's not going back.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

Broncos are meeting with Jammal williams the NT from the chargers who we should sign, instead of kemoatu.

and the saints are meeting with Leonard Little and also plan to meet with Jammal Williams as well.

I still don't know what is going on with Parker and Foote.

WE NEED FOOTE.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;671202]I think that means that you have post that have been deleted. It's like putting a bunch of stuff in a bag and stretching out the bag than taking things out. I mean you have less stuff in the bag but once it's stretched it's not going back.[/quote]


What? That is when there are pages you can't reach for example the thread shows 5 pages put the you can only view up to four. Iam talking about the last post button off the main page.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;671170]That deal would be even worse than the Portis/Bailey trade in my opinion. I don't even think Vinny would have been dumb enough to do that trade and he's the guy who gave up a 2nd and a 6th for Jason Taylor. If we were to do a trade involving those players, it would have to be a straightup trade. I wouldnt even throw in a 7th rounder and i'd be inclined to insist they provide something else. Rogers may have bad hands but he does a pretty good job of shutting receviers down most of the time. He's definitely a starting corner in the league. You don't trade starting corners for #3 running backs/return men.[/quote]

Exactly...a starting CB is harder to find and therefor worth more then a RB. A straight up trade is not even fair. The Chargers were letting Sprolles walk until they saw interest and thought they could get a draft pick. Let them get it from someone else.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

[quote=SmootSmack;671077]Would you trade Rogers and [B]our 2nd[/B] rounder for Sproles and a 3rd? Keep in mind it would be the last pick in the 3rd round

(And keep in mind I'm just the rumor mongering messenger here)[/quote]


:nono:no. take our 2nd out and i'd do it. rogers for sproles and their 3rd.

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

Colts just cut Ryan Lilja. Worth a look?

Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
 

^ Wow, really? Sure, look at Lilja.