![]() |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
We've got to start giving drug test to some of the people who post on here. LOL
|
THE ultTIMATe MatchUPs Super Bowl D vs SupER Bowl 0
[quote][IMG]http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o99/milrenkb/Redskins2008D-2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o99/milrenkb/RedskinsO2008-1.jpg?t=1266979712[/IMG] [/quote] Come ON NYC *hicup* u can't l00k at dis n tell me it's *hicup* not AWEEEsome Some other notes so you guyas can c dat I not pretends - We trade Cooley 4 1st round pick - We trade Campbell for 2 1st round picks - We trade CP for Cromartie - We trade Heyer for 3rd round pick I think thats 10 picks. NFL won't let us have more. |
Re: Redskins 2010 Super Official (Defenetlay NOT MAdden or Unrealistic) Snyder will spends!!! Super SmART
[quote=Dirtbag359;665550][IMG]http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o99/milrenkb/Redskins2008D-2.jpg[/IMG]
Agens let me know.....oh well only an IDIOT wouldn't see the genius of this. I wanted to put Rolle at FS but I thought that might be overkill.[/quote] I like this idea a lot more than your idea for the offense, but I really don't see it being pulled off. I guess one can wish. |
Re: Redskins 2010 Super Official (Defenetlay NOT MAdden or Unrealistic) Snyder will spends!!! Super SmART
[quote=Redskin Jim;665555]I like this idea a lot more than your idea for the offense, but I really don't see it being pulled off. I guess one can wish.[/quote]
Poor Jimz *hicup* can'tz c's ma genius *hickup* |
Re: Redskins 2010 Super Official (Defenetlay NOT MAdden or Unrealistic) Snyder will spends!!! Super SmART
[quote=Dirtbag359;665556]Poor Jimz *hicup* can'tz c's ma genius *hickup*[/quote]
LOL, You got me. I was thinking you were crazy for a minute there Dirtbag. |
Re: Redskins 2010 Super Official (Defenetlay NOT MAdden or Unrealistic) Snyder will spends!!! Super SmART
[quote=Redskin Jim;665557]LOL, You got me.
I was thinking you were crazy for a minute there Dirtbag.[/quote] Jim *hickup* one does not.....kid when they paint the Mona Lisa Lol, good times. |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
[quote=SmootSmack;665535]Damn. It was strongly suggested, supposedly, to McCoy that he lose weight following the Senior Bowl. Doesn't look like he did. And if he did...Damn!![/quote]
yep, I mentioned this earlier I understand at over 300 you're not going to be chiseled, but that's just sloppy I wouldn't put my bucks on that kid since he won't even try to improve his draft stock.. if there's any motivation out there it's to get drafted high, you can't tell me it will get higher once he gets drafted |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
[quote=CultBrennan59;665279]actually I don't know about Terrence Cody anymore, just as long as he doesn't show up to the combine looking like this...
[url]http://i2.cdn.turner.com/si/2010/football/nfl/02/23/combine.45/terrence-cody-p1.jpg[/url] [IMG]http://i2.cdn.turner.com/si/2010/football/nfl/02/23/combine.45/terrence-cody-p1.jpg[/IMG][/quote] That boy has bigger hooters than some women that I have dated. |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
[quote=Dirtbag359;665299]They really need to start providing shirts to people from Alabama. Two years in a row now.[/quote]
you beat me to it. haha, first andre smith, and now this? sweet lord find that man a shirt. |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
[quote=Lotus;665653]That boy has bigger hooters than some women that I have dated.[/quote]
I know it should have a NSFW warning attached to the original post. |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
I hope Dirtbag359 is joking, because Hampton will be franchised and Wilfork is franchised and they all play NT which won't work.
|
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
Hampton just got resigned....take him off our wish list
|
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
You guys should be proud of my Non-Madden ultra realistic not a joke team. It's all come from ideas of suggested free agents, trades, and other moves found here, RI, and ES. Basically if those three bodies ran the team this is what we would end up with.
|
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
Bucs are going to let Antonio Bryant go....
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/25/bucs-decide-to-move-on-from-antonio-bryant/]Bucs decide to "move on" from Antonio Bryant | ProFootballTalk.com[/url] |
Re: Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D
[quote=Ruhskins;663411]Do you realize that without the CBA in place, this offseason prior to the uncapped year most free agents under 30 yrs. old are going to be RFAs? (example: McNeill from San Diego).
So basically, these are your options when it comes to building the offensive line: - Draft a 1st or 2nd round lineman - Draft a 4th, 5th, or 7th round lineman - Trade picks for an RFA - Sign an older UFA While we will likely sign an UFA or two and definitely draft a lineman in the later rounds, I just don't see how you don't draft a lineman in the 1st or 2nd round.[/quote] Just to help out..... [URL="http://www.footballsfuture.com/2010/fa/ol.html"]2010 NFL Free Agents: OL[/URL] [SIZE=5]Edit: Never mind. They have Jansen listed as a Redskin. Sorry.[/SIZE] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.