Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=35622)

Pocket$ $traight 03-12-2010 10:33 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673300]Ok, how crazy does this senario sound. Andre Carter, JC, next years #1pick, for Adam Carriker and swap this years first round draft choice and there 2nd round pick in 2011.

We Get:
Sam Bradford
Adam Carriker
2011 2nd round pick(Rams)

They Get:
Our #1 Pick 2010
Our #1 Pick 2011
Andre Carter
Jason Campbell


If that is not enough, I would throw in Cooley. Is this crazy?[/quote]


I didn't know that Mike Ditka was on the Warpath!
Hey, let's throw in Rogers and Landry too...

Vinny just laughed at your proposal.

T.O.Killa 03-12-2010 10:35 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
When I called the Cutler trade, everyone laughed at me. I said a 1st 3rd and Campbell. It came down to Campbell versus Orton.

Skinsfanatic 03-12-2010 10:36 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;673317]
Vinny just laughed at your proposal.[/quote]

That killed me.

Pocket$ $traight 03-12-2010 10:41 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673321]When I called the Cutler trade, everyone laughed at me. I said a 1st 3rd and Campbell. It came down to Campbell versus Orton.[/quote]

The Cutler trade was idiotic. Thank goodness the Bears saved us from ourselves. Every person in Bears management is fighting for their job now because of that deal.

SirClintonPortis 03-12-2010 10:43 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673316]San Diego was not done with him, his last year with them he was phenomenal. He tore his shoulder and that made the decision easier for them. Shottenhiemer has said he never wanted to let him go.[/quote]
Exactly, they were done with him because Marty decided to go send him out in a meaningless game and risk injury to Brees. As it turned out, it was extremely severe and they let him go.

Now, I wonder which FA QB's this year still have a high ceiling like that? Hmm...yep..no one on the market this year. Sexy Rexy, Busted Knee Daunte, and a bunch of other ineffective ones.

12thMan 03-12-2010 10:47 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
Mark Bulger, Adam Carriker, and a third for Andre Carter and Jason Campbell.

SirClintonPortis 03-12-2010 10:55 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673321]When I called the Cutler trade, everyone laughed at me. I said a 1st 3rd and Campbell. It came down to Campbell versus Orton.[/quote]

The oppurtunity cost of getting Cutler turned out to be Orakpo. Basically, a QB negator vs. a QB.

Now, even with the heightened importance of the QB position, most Super Bowl winning teams have other cornerstones besides a QB. Namely, an above-average to elite pass rusher, a solid O-line, at least one playmaker in the secondary and linebacking corps, special teams, and a coach who can coach. Had Cutler come here, we would have still been stuck with incompetent Zorn, a soft defense that's about as archaic and predictable as one could get, and a shitty running game that in turn leads into a one-dimensional and ineffective offense.

Ruhskins 03-12-2010 11:01 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673321]When I called the Cutler trade, everyone laughed at me. I said a 1st 3rd and Campbell. It came down to Campbell versus Orton.[/quote]

And we would still be laughing at you right now.

T.O.Killa 03-12-2010 11:07 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=12thMan;673329]Mark Bulger, Adam Carriker, and a third for Andre Carter and Jason Campbell.[/quote]
I like Bulger, but I dont think if the Rams want Bradford this will sway them.

T.O.Killa 03-12-2010 11:09 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=Ruhskins;673333]And we would still be laughing at you right now.[/quote]
Hey I love Orakpo, but Cutler and Shannahan would have been a match made in heaven. Don't count Cutler out, yet.

53Fan 03-12-2010 11:35 PM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673336]Hey I love Orakpo,[B] but Cutler and Shannahan would have been a match made in heaven.[/B] Don't count Cutler out, yet.[/quote]

How many playoff games did they go to together in Denver? Or are you talking about Kyle?

Dirtbag59 03-13-2010 12:00 AM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=53Fan;673341]How many playoff games did they go to together in Denver? Or are you talking about Kyle?[/quote]

Ah the joy of being an NFL QB. Everything goes right you get all the credit. Something goes wrong and the blame falls squarely on you.

Ruhskins 03-13-2010 12:14 AM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=T.O.Killa;673336]Hey I love Orakpo, but Cutler and Shannahan would have been a match made in heaven. Don't count Cutler out, yet.[/quote]

Still there's no tell what the outcome would have been. Cutler playing behind our shitty line would probably have been no good (definitely would have thrown more INTs). And let's say he would have played decently, now we would be one Pro Bowler LB short (Orakpo) and one CB (Barnes).

Pocket$ $traight 03-13-2010 12:27 AM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=Ruhskins;673345]Still there's no tell what the outcome would have been. Cutler playing behind our shitty line would probably have been no good (definitely would have thrown more INTs). And let's say he would have played decently, now we would be one Pro Bowler LB short (Orakpo) and one CB (Barnes).[/quote]

I think he would have had less INTs because he would have been on his back twice as much.

We also would have been without the 4th pick this year.

Like I said, the Cutler deal was idiotic.

Ruhskins 03-13-2010 12:32 AM

Re: JLC: Redskins Interested in Adam Carriker
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;673353][B]I think he would have had less INTs because he would have been on his back twice as much.[/B]

We also would have been without the 4th pick this year.

Like I said, the Cutler deal was idiotic.[/quote]

:laughing-


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.50203 seconds with 9 queries