Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=Schneed10;814424]Um, I'd like to point out that Gaffney, over the last two years, has put up the following numbers:

2009: 54 catches, 732 yards, 13.6 avg, 2 TDs
2010: 65 catches, 875 yards, 13.5 avg, 2 TDs

Those yardage and TD numbers look strikingly similar to Anthony Armstrong's. Doesn't anybody like depth in their receiving corps?

I'm fine with this move. Let the rooks compete with guys like this and see what shakes out.[/quote]

Yeah and Brandon Lloyd put up 1,500 yards in the same offense. Oh well, they gave it a shot.

[QUOTE=Beemnseven;814611]There have been a couple of instances where Redskins defensive ends have been cut loose and gone on to have decent careers elsewhere ... N.D. Kalu and Chris Clemons, specifically. Clemons had 11 friggin' sacks for Seattle last year. Not too shabby. Don't know how he would fit in the 3-4 though. It'll be interesting to see if Jarmon does the same thing.

As for all these wideouts, let's look at the numbers from our dudes last year:

Moss -- 93 catches, 1115 yards, 6 TDs, his longest was 56 yards
Armstrong -- 44 catches, 874 yards, 3 TDs, longest reception was 76 yards.

Are these are typical numbers for a number one and number two duo?

Here's the rest ...

Joey Galloway -- 12 for 173 yards (longest was 62 yards)
Banks -- 2 catches for 10 yards
Roydell -- 8 for 109 yards (longest was 34 yards)
Terrance Austin -- 3 for 47 yards (longest was 28 yards)

^None of these guys scored a receiving TD.

Let's face it, apart from the returning capabilities of Banks, there's just not a whole lot here. I'd say we have receiving corps that's ripe for some competition...[/QUOTE]

Agreed.

I think people thought we'd be set with the 3 rookies and holdovers from last year, and in a normal offseason that might have been the case. But this is not a normal offseason and expecting these guys to be ready with just training camp is crazy talk. Fact is we need vets who can play now while we bring along the young guys slowly.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

Gafney was suppose to be the truth coming out of college. However like most Florida receivers he struggled in the NFL.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

gaffney is fine, but nothing impressive. guess if jarmon wasn't going to make it, it makes sense... he seemed to be a lot better in the 4-3 as a 3rd down rusher then anywhere on a 3-4.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=That Guy;814973]gaffney is fine, but nothing impressive. guess if jarmon wasn't going to make it, it makes sense... he seemed to be a lot better in the 4-3 as a 3rd down rusher then anywhere on a 3-4.[/quote]

:confused: Who are you?

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=Dirtbag59;815715]:confused: Who are you?[/quote]

He's that guy.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=mooby;815716]He's that guy.[/quote]

He bears an uncanny resemblance to a guy that use to post here regularly but it can't be the same person.

Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
 

[quote=Dirtbag59;815721]He bears an uncanny resemblance to a guy that use to post here regularly but it can't be the same person.[/quote]

All I know is that he's that guy. You may not see him around very often, but when you do, you just know who he is because he's that guy. That guy can't be mistaken for anyone else.