Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Here goes:

1. Moss
2. Hankerson
3. AA
4. Gaffney
5. Kelly
6. Banks

PS: Austin, Paul

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

1. Moss.
2. Armstrong
3. Gaffney or Kelly. Both are possession receivers and neither is a special teamer.
4. Hankerson. Will challenge Armstrong for his job by week 10.
5. Austin or Paul. Depends on which one is better on special teams.
6. Banks. Unless Robinson or Paul returns kicks better then I don't see Banks being cut.

PS
Paul--unless he beats out Austin or Banks.
Robinson--unless he beats out Banks.

Even with how ridiculous our passing options are, we are still just one true big play number one receiver away from having a great WR core. Santana is a mediocre 1st option now but he would be the greatest 2nd option in the history of football. Make Armstrong just go deep and Mr Hanky as a wildcard type as a rookie and that squad is tight with two solid TE's. I'm not a huge Edwards fan but that might be the move that puts it all in order.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

1. Moss
2. Kelly
3. Gaffney
4. Hank
5. AA
6. Banks

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

^^ A combination of one of the 100 different posts already filled out.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=SkinzWin;819214]1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

^^ A combination of one of the 100 different posts already filled out.[/quote]

Mmm, going out on a limb huh? Daring.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=mooby;819218]Mmm, going out on a limb huh? Daring.[/quote]

That's how I roll. Seriously though, I think it is very hard to say exactly what will happen. Kelly could be a starter or could break himself in two again. Gaffney could play lights out or just play out, of a starting job. I like what I've heard about Hank Hill in camp so I'll go....

1. Moss
2. Hank Hill
3. AA
4. Gaffney (tie)
4. Kelly (tie
6. Banks

PS: Austin and/or Robinson and/or Paul :)

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

I'm hearing good things about Paul. If Kelly slips up I think Paul will be right there to grab a roster spot from him.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Gonna try this again.

1.) Moss
2.) Gaffney
3.) AA
4.) Hankerson (tie)
5.) Kelly (tie)
6.) Niles Paul

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

From the sound of things Hankerson is going to work his way on to the field sooner rather than later. Probably won't be long til he's starting.

Check this out:

[URL="http://twitter.com/#%21/NFLSkins"]NFLSkins[/URL] Ed Sheahin
"[URL="http://twitter.com/skinswarpath"]@skinswarpath[/URL]: [URL="http://twitter.com/NFLSkins"]@NFLSkins[/URL] what current NFL WR would you compare Hankerson to in terms of his ability?" [B]- Bigger Reggie Wayne[/B]

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

i have'nt seen nor heard anything about kelly this year.is he uninjured and playing well in camp?i think hankerson starts by week 5 regardless.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

I think he will be the number one receiver by week 8, with Moss in the slot and Kelly in the #2.

By week 8....

1. Hankerson
2. Kelly
3. Moss
4. Armstrong
5. Austin
6. Gaffney

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Kelly? Ha!
That would be a shocker...a pleasant surprise.
I hope so, but i think he will get hurt

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Man, that'd be a sweet formation of Hankerson and Kelly on the outside and Moss in the slot.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=Ruhskins;819356]Man, that'd be a sweet formation of Hankerson and Kelly on the outside and Moss in the slot.[/quote]Yes it would, although I would hope that in the land where everything goes right for us, Armstrong would get the first shot at the third receiver over Moss. It might even make sense then to do some 4 WR stuff with a tight end in the backfield instead of a RB.