Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1284225]been gone a few days moving but I'm surprised they couldn't trade Moses for a 5th at least but oh well[/quote]

Moving? You should be in the grinding your gears thread.

I think they did Moses a solid giving him the choice where to play. Would have loved to get a pick, but team leverage is probably at its lowest around this time of year.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1284227]I really wonder what Jason thinks….he seems reasonable, relaxed and normal. I would love to sit back with a beer or bourbon with Jason Wright and just ask him what’s it like working for Snyder.

This was just the weirdest, wtf Snyder moment I’ve seen in awhile. TMZ folks, TMZ[/QUOTE]


Jason looks to me how most employees look in the presence of their billionaire bosses — slightly awkward, eager to please, and committed to the party line. I admit that’s how I’d be lol. I just hope there’s a line of self-debasement he won’t cross. Maybe he turns down the invitation to watch cheerleader videos in Dan’s suite.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Dan's probably got a home cinema set up for that. Doubt he'd do it at the stadium/offices. He's not THAT stupid is he?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=Pervis_Griffith;1284222]Ryan Fitzpatrick can make history this season ..... and not in a good way.



He could be the only QB in NFL history to have lost to 31 different franchises.



3 QB's have wins over all 32 NFL franchises (Brees, Favre, P. Manning). No QB has losses to all 32 franchises. Ryan can get the closest if the Skins lose to Green Bay, New Orleans, and Tampa Bay. Anyway ... linked to article, and copied and pasted below ...







[url]https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/05/23/ryan-fitzpatrick-can-become-first-starting-qb-to-lose-to-31-different-teams/[/url]



[I]Three starting quarterbacks in NFL history have wins over all 32 NFL teams: Drew Brees, Brett Favre and Peyton Manning. Tom Brady will join that list if his Buccaneers beat the Patriots this season. And Aaron Rodgers could join the list too if he ends up on another team, and that team beats the Packers. But no quarterback has accomplished the feat of losing to all 32 teams.



Washington quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick can come the closest this season.



Fitzpatrick has lost to 28 different teams as a starting quarterback, according to Pro Football Reference. Of the four teams he hasn’t lost to, three are on Washington’s schedule this season: The Packers, Saints and Buccaneers. If Fitzpatrick loses to those three teams, he’ll have lost to an all-time record 31 NFL teams. (The Lions are the one team Fitzpatrick hasn’t lost to and won’t play this season.)



Although no starting quarterback has lost to 31 or 32 different teams, seven have lost to 30: Drew Bledsoe, Drew Brees, Brett Favre, Matt Hasselbeck, Jon Kitna, Carson Palmer and Alex Smith. One quarterback, Kerry Collins, has lost to 29 teams. But all of those quarterbacks are retired, so they can’t reach 31 losses like Fitzpatrick.



In addition to Fitzpatrick, the other quarterbacks who have lost to 28 different teams in their careers are Derek Carr, Jay Cutler, Joe Flacco, Jeff George, Eli Manning, Warren Moon, Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, Matt Ryan and Vinny Testaverde. Carr, Flacco, Roethlisberger and Ryan can still add to their totals, but none can reach 31 different teams this season like Fitzpatrick can: Ryan’s Falcons only play two of the four teams he hasn’t lost to, while Carr’s Raiders and Roethlisberger’s Steelers play one each. Flacco’s Eagles play two of the teams he hasn’t lost to, but he’s not expected to start this season, so Flacco is unlikely to add to his total.



Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Matthew Stafford have each lost to 27 different teams, but none of them can add more than three new losses this season, so none can catch Fitzpatrick.



In a strange way, losing to all 32 teams is a more difficult accomplishment than beating all 32 teams: Quarterbacks who lose a lot of games usually get benched or cut and don’t last long enough to lose to all 32 teams. It’s hard to keep a starting job for a long time while losing a lot of games. But Fitzpatrick has been a starter for eight different franchises, and Washington will be his ninth. He’s had an unusual career, and this year he can do something unprecedented in NFL history.

[/I][/QUOTE]

Brady, Rodgers have lost to 27, Roethlisberger 28 like Fitzpatrick. Such a non-story story

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1284231]Brady, Rodgers have lost to 27, Roethlisberger 28 like Fitzpatrick. Such a non-story story

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

Typical profootballtalk fuckery. These dumb fucks, any negative story to associate with the skins is their MO.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1284223]Monday morning cringe clip:

[url]https://www.tmz.com/videos/2021-05-19-051921-daniel-snyder-1083297/[/url]

Snyder touring across the world for “stadium ideas.” This seems kinda staged but why does Snyder seem so awkward? Glad Jason is now advising him…and Snyder is staying out of football decisions

So let me get this straight…Snyder won’t talk or give interviews to the press, yet speaking to *checks notes*…TMZ? Jfc…[/quote]

Wow a reporter actually caught him out in the wild .. I dont think Ive seen Snyder speak like that, off the cuff. Its usually once every 4 years or so with prepared statements behind a podium.

I think this was a sneak attack street interview that caught him and Jason off guard ... but in this social media world nothing is organic, everything is staged so who knows.

I thought Snyder did well. My expectation is very low though.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1284232]Typical profootballtalk fuckery. These dumb fucks, any negative story to associate with the skins is their MO.[/quote]

I'm surprised they are even still afloat... Nobody respects them

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=SunnySide;1284233]Wow a reporter actually caught him out in the wild .. I dont think Ive seen Snyder speak like that, off the cuff. Its usually once every 4 years or so with prepared statements behind a podium.

I think this was a sneak attack street interview that caught him and Jason off guard ... but in this social media world nothing is organic, everything is staged so who knows.

I thought Snyder did well. My expectation is very low though.[/quote]

The mega rich life.. Must b hard lol

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

The fact that Wright said "The name will be announced pretty soon" leads me to believe it will be before the season starts. I bet it stays WFT

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1284238]The fact that Wright said "The name will be announced pretty soon" leads me to believe it will be before the season starts. I bet it stays WFT[/QUOTE]God that will suck

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1284241]God that will suck

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

Then we're still the Redskins. :httr:


This is a cool take on it: [url]https://riggosrag.com/2021/05/21/the-washington-football-team-should-the-name-stay/[/url]

"In my opinion, if THE Washington Football Team remains, so does the history. While the name is bland, it does allow the team and history to remain. Creating a new logo and name is basically creating a new brand.

Yes, the Lombardi trophies remain in Ashburn and the memories of players who dawned the Burgundy and Gold will always be in our heart. But a new name creates a new identity.
[B]
[SIZE="4"]I don’t want a new identity. I want to be remembered as the team that had a name so great that it couldn’t be replaced.[/SIZE][/B]"

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1284241]God that will suck

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

+1

0 points for creativity Dan.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

I'm fine with whatever name at this point, just pick something and get it over with.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=Monkeydad;1284242]Then we're still the Redskins. :httr:





This is a cool take on it: [url]https://riggosrag.com/2021/05/21/the-washington-football-team-should-the-name-stay/[/url]



"In my opinion, if THE Washington Football Team remains, so does the history. While the name is bland, it does allow the team and history to remain. Creating a new logo and name is basically creating a new brand.



Yes, the Lombardi trophies remain in Ashburn and the memories of players who dawned the Burgundy and Gold will always be in our heart. But a new name creates a new identity.

[B]

[SIZE="4"]I don’t want a new identity. I want to be remembered as the team that had a name so great that it couldn’t be replaced.[/SIZE][/B]"[/QUOTE]BS thats just a lame excuse for being stuck with WTF for 100 years. I loved the Redskins, wanted it to stay, but at this point that name has sailed so move on and bring a new pride to the legacy.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1284250]BS thats just a lame excuse for being stuck with WTF for 100 years. I loved the Redskins, wanted it to stay, but at this point that name has sailed so move on and bring a new pride to the legacy.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

Nope. They will always be the Redskins to me. Will never buy anything with the new name and will never call them by their new name.