![]() |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=CrustyRedskin;726007]WOuld somebody please post the total stat for that whole draft class: Thomas, Kelly, and Davis. And lets just take a look and see how much production the skins have gotten from that draft????????????????[/quote]
Malcolm Kelly: 28 Recs, 365 Yds, 0 TDs Devin Thomas: 40 Recs, 445 Yds, 3 TDs Fred Davis: 51 Recs, 563 Yds, 6 TDs Total: 118 Recs, 1373 Yds, 9 TDs Funny story, those totals are worse than Andre Johnson from last season (outside of receptions). You know what's not difficult? Going to NFL.com, searching for each player's stats and then posting them... |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=CrustyRedskin;726007]WOuld somebody please post the total stat for that whole draft class: Thomas, Kelly, and Davis. And lets just take a look and see how much production the skins have gotten from that draft????????????????[/quote]
Are we your bitches???? Here you go, find it yourself: [url=http://www.pro-football-reference.com/?__utma=1.1236937843.1283277920.1283277920.1283277920.1&__utmb=165250732.2.9.1283277920187&__utmc=165250732&__utmx=-&__utmz=1.1283277920.1.1.utmcsr=%28direct%29|utmccn=%28direct%29|utmcmd=%28none%29&__utmv=-&__utmk=211259797]Pro-Football-Reference.com - Pro Football Statistics and History[/url] |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=GTripp0012;726005]Banks wouldn't make it "over" Thomas. Thomas would be cut to free up the roster spot, then they'd probably play the waiver wire. Banks, if he's not the starting punt returner, probably gets passed through to practice squad after dodging a round of waiver pickups.
LaCanfora mentioned Andre Davis as a guy Kyle Shanahan might be into in order to shore up this gaping hole on our roster.[/quote]Banks will not make the final roster. |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
I'm sort of glad Kelly ended up on IR, it seemed inevitable at this point. I would have been a bit disappointed if he had been cut. Right now, I'd like to see Moss, Galloway, Armstrong, Thomas, and Banks with Banks returning kicks, although he may not have helped his cause much against the Jets. I really haven't seen anything at all from Austin that would put him on this team.
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=Paintrain;726003]No way Banks makes it over Thomas. Thomas is far to valuable (and proven) on special teams on coverage and return units plus he's done nothing in the preseason to warrant being cut. Banks has a muff, a fumble and a TD and adds nothing on coverage units. Don't forget also that he will be the backup PR, Buchanon will be the starter when the season starts. You don't keep 5-6, 155 one dimensional rookies over 3rd year players coming into their own.[/quote]
I'm with you. |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Bottom line is both these guys continue to be a major disappointments and both look to be busts. Thanks Vinny.
Thomas cut in our WR corp? No way, we are way to weak even to cut Thomas at this point. I think that would be a mistake. He deserves one season under Shanny. Malcom Kelly, can someone please tell me why I should give a flying f*ck about this guy? cut'm, IR him, i dont give a sh*t |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Banks is making this team....guaranteed! One only needs to see Shanny's face as he talks about him to know that.
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Thomas is making the team, I don't even see him being on the bubble at this point.
As for Kelly, to be continued... |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=mredskins;726012]Are we your bitches????
Here you go, find it yourself: [url=http://www.pro-football-reference.com/?__utma=1.1236937843.1283277920.1283277920.1283277920.1&__utmb=165250732.2.9.1283277920187&__utmc=165250732&__utmx=-&__utmz=1.1283277920.1.1.utmcsr=%28direct%29|utmccn=%28direct%29|utmcmd=%28none%29&__utmv=-&__utmk=211259797]Pro-Football-Reference.com - Pro Football Statistics and History[/url][/quote] lolololol |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=saden1;726020]Banks is making this team....guaranteed! One only needs to see Shanny's face as he talks about him to know that.[/quote]
I feel like Shanahan thinks he's Eddie Royal. I really hope he ends up making the team, I think he could end up being a good return guy and maybe a nice little gadget player to have. I'd like to add, I'm not as quick as others to say "Thomas is making the team." Right now, I think he will, but I'm not so sure Shanahan likes him or his hands all that much. (This is really based on nothing other than some strange feeling I have re: Thomas) |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Wouldn't be one bit surprised if Thomas gets cut due to the fact that he stinks.
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=SmootSmack;726004]Wonder if they'll even go 6 deep at this point[/quote]
Yeah, regardless of if we go 5 or 6, our receiving corps is suspect at best. Amongst the worst in the league IMO. Cooley and Davis are going to see a lot of targets. |
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[IMG]http://www.blogcdn.com/blog.redskins.com/media/2010/08/ap080721010199.jpg[/IMG]from Matt Terl's blog
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
i dont think banks is the lock to make the team so many people think he is. I honestly think Austin has a much better shot of making the roster.
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
[quote=CRedskinsRule;726033][IMG]http://www.blogcdn.com/blog.redskins.com/media/2010/08/ap080721010199.jpg[/IMG]from Matt Terl's blog[/quote]Is that from this year? Do the vets STILL make MK carry their helmets?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.