Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

Maybe it's just me, but I would easily take Hakeem Nicks over V.Jax any day of the week.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=mooby;923547]Maybe it's just me, but I would easily take Hakeem Nicks over V.Jax any day of the week.[/quote]

Agreed

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=mooby;923547]Maybe it's just me, but I would easily take Hakeem Nicks over V.Jax any day of the week.[/quote]

And twice on Sundays.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

V.Jax is a good receiver but I feel he benefited from P.Rivers ALOT. Rivers IMO is easily a top 5 QB, even with his down year last year. This year should be a real test for him. Without a big, fast, proven #1 WR I wanna see how he produces. Royal is gonna friggin blow UP this year.

Lock it up.

Nicks is an awesome receiver and I would take him over any of the guys we have on our squad right now. His drop against us last year when he was WIDE open is one of my favorite plays of his, lol.

[QUOTE=JGisLordOfTheRings;923625]V.Jax is a good receiver but I feel he benefited from P.Rivers ALOT. Rivers IMO is easily a top 5 QB, even with his down year last year. This year should be a real test for him. Without a big, fast, proven #1 WR I wanna see how he produces. Royal is gonna friggin blow UP this year.

Lock it up.

Nicks is an awesome receiver and I would take him over any of the guys we have on our squad right now. His drop against us last year when he was WIDE open is one of my favorite plays of his, lol.[/QUOTE]

Rivers is a stud

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

If Nicks were looking for a new team in free agency, I doubt if he would generate more interest than Vincent Jackson or Brandon Marshall.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;923691]If Nicks were looking for a new team in free agency, I doubt if he would generate more interest than Vincent Jackson or Brandon Marshall.[/quote]

That's very debatable considering he's much younger than those guys.

He's been pretty damn solid the last 2 years

79-1052-11
76-1192-7

And he's only entering his 4th season.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=Mattyk;923693]That's very debatable considering he's much younger than those guys.

He's been pretty damn solid the last 2 years

79-1052-11
76-1192-7

And he's only entering his 4th season.[/quote]

I agree. His youth coupled with the fact that as a reciever, he steps up in big spots and is still learning and getting better would make him a much more sought after commodity IMO. You know EXACTLY what your ceiling is with Marshall and V.Jax. At least Nicks has sick upside to go with his freaky ups and hands.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

Nicks doesn't get the same respect that Vincent Jackson and Brandon Marshall receives despite being a solid wide receiver. Nicks has been very productive in the Giants passing game, yet he's not considered elite by many.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;923974]Nicks doesn't get the same respect that Vincent Jackson and Brandon Marshall receives despite being a solid wide receiver. Nicks has been very productive in the Giants passing game, yet he's not considered elite by many.[/quote]

Giants(Eli) have been very good at spreading the ball around,with Cruz emerging and Maningham and Jake Ballard ,throw once in a while to the backs and there just weren't balls enough to go around to make anyone player a super star.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

Perhaps Nicks will be a superstar receiver one day. Jerry Reese has to be in the top 3 GMs in the NFL. He knows how to pick players.

Re: nfl top 100 2012
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;924487]Perhaps Nicks will be a superstar receiver [B]one day[/B]. Jerry Reese has to be in the top 3 GMs in the NFL. He knows how to pick players.[/quote]

Lol @ one day. You are quite entertaining dude.