![]() |
Re: Post game dallas
I believe this is the week D Hall gets activated. My guess is McClure goes to IR.
|
Re: Post game dallas
If D Hall is activated I give him a few weeks max before he's hurt. He has shown no ability at all to stay healthy the last few years.
|
Re: Post game dallas
[url]http://cdn.stationcaster.com/stations/wtem/media/mpeg/10_30_17_Cooley___Kevin_HR_1-1509373669.mp3[/url]
Kevin Sheehan "If you blame yesterday loss on the QB or the coach, you're an idiot". |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=punch it in;1178326]TE is definitely on the list of needs.[/quote]
Seems crazy to say it, but his liability as a blocker limits the offense in a lot of ways. It nudges you in the direction of being one dimensional. |
Re: Post game dallas
[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1178331]If D Hall is activated I give him a few weeks max before he's hurt. He has shown no ability at all to stay healthy the last few years.[/QUOTE]Lol hall is done, just stay on the sidelines and help coach up the young guys
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=skinsfaninok;1178350]Lol hall is done, just stay on the sidelines and help coach up the young guys
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote] Agreed. Plus the secondary is not an area of crucial need right now. Safeties are playing good and even without Bree, Dunbar is getting the job done. |
Re: Post game dallas
[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1178365]Agreed. Plus the secondary is not an area of crucial need right now. Safeties are playing good and even without Bree, Dunbar is getting the job done.[/QUOTE]Dunbar will be breelands replacement after this year
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=skinsfaninok;1178374]Dunbar will be breelands replacement after this year
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote] Breeland has actually played pretty well this year, even at less than 100%. If Dunbar replaces him next year, it will be because Breeland is starting somewhere else. |
Re: Post game dallas
Interesting stat:
the Redskins are 3-12 since 2015 against teams that are over .500. |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=mredskins;1178382]Interesting stat:
the Redskins are 3-12 since 2015 against teams that are over .500.[/quote] Interesting stat or expected stat?? |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1178383]Interesting stat or expected stat??[/quote]
That doesn't look good on jay and kirk |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=metalskins;1178378]Breeland has actually played pretty well this year, even at less than 100%. If Dunbar replaces him next year, it will be because Breeland is starting somewhere else.[/quote]
Yeah thats what I mean, we wont be able to pay him |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=skinsfan69;1178331]If D Hall is activated I give him a few weeks max before he's hurt. He has shown no ability at all to stay healthy the last few years.[/quote]
I forgot all about him, I just assumed he would retire after the last injury. |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=mredskins;1178382]Interesting stat:
the Redskins are 3-12 since 2015 against teams that are over .500.[/quote] Over .500 at the time, or over .500 at the end of the season? |
Re: Post game dallas
[quote=Schneed10;1178343]Seems crazy to say it, but his liability as a blocker limits the offense in a lot of ways. It nudges you in the direction of being one dimensional.[/quote]Reed's inability as a blocker AND his inability to stay on the field are both killers. I can't believe I'm saying this, but give me Zach Ertz all day over Reed. He can't block either, but he's always open, and he's available every week.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.