Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=MTK;1297507]The only ones really talking about Watson are the fans and some in the local media. Outside of DC everyone knows he isn't coming here. He has a no trade clause and we haven't heard WFT mentioned one single time as somewhere he wants to go.[/quote]

And that's fine with me. Don't want him.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[QUOTE=Chief X_Phackter;1297474]I can't even remember when this team last played a full game of complementary football. One side has picked up the other on occasion, but they haven't put it all together in quite some time.[/QUOTE]


It is unusual for them to have back to back score and stops let alone a game of complimentary football. The crazy shit that this team goes through really makes me wonder about a damn curse. Either Native American induced or our idiot owner sold his soul for a division title….couldn’t even get a deal done for a super bowl.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1297502]I don't want Watson. He is a sick fucker. I read a piece about the complaint on ESPN. Repetitive predator type of behavior.

You are an NFL QB. You can have multiple women if that's your thing. Why the massage creepiness? I don't want that guy. He has serious issues.[/QUOTE]


Lol. Always cracks me up when celebrities get caught doing these things. Seriously they can have as many women as they want. Go to a club in a limo alone and go home with 10 of them. Im sorry but if I was super rich and horny the last thing im doing is going to a rub and tug. Im going out and getting some the old fashioned way - im wining and dining and sixty nining!!

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[QUOTE=mredskins;1297514]I really hate the title of this thread. A "good loss" its come to that, we are celebrating good losses.[/QUOTE]


I made a joke in the gameday thread about it and CRed was just carrying it over to the post game thread. Nobody really believes in good losses. Lol.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1297502]I don't want Watson. He is a sick fucker. I read a piece about the complaint on ESPN. Repetitive predator type of behavior.

You are an NFL QB. You can have multiple women if that's your thing. Why the massage creepiness? I don't want that guy. He has serious issues.[/quote]

I was invited to join a work group inside my organization today…the email subject line read:

Tableau User Group - (T.U.G)

My first thought was, is Deshawn Watson in this group?

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=punch it in;1297600]I made a joke in the gameday thread about it and CRed was just carrying it over to the post game thread. Nobody really believes in good losses. Lol.[/quote]

That is not what the FAQs say

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

Washington's third down defense is statistically the second-worst in NFL history through 7 games since 1940.

JP

WOWZERS

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=baltimoreskins;1297603]that is not what the faqs say[/quote]


lol

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1297617]Washington's third down defense is statistically the second-worst in NFL history through 7 games since 1940.

JP

WOWZERS[/quote]

This is a fact that cannot be mitigated or explained away. The extraordinary patience exhibited by Ron Rivera in this case is not a virtue. This level of defensive incompetence demands immediate personnel changes, either in players, coaches or both. Honestly, if Rivera fails to make swift, effective changes to the defense, his job should rightfully be on the line. As much as I would hate to see him lose his job, he is now fair game, IMO.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1297640]This is a fact that cannot be mitigated or explained away. The extraordinary patience exhibited by Ron Rivera in this case is not a virtue. This level of defensive incompetence demands immediate personnel changes, either in players, coaches or both. Honestly, if Rivera fails to make swift, effective changes to the defense, his job should rightfully be on the line. As much as I would hate to see him lose his job, he is now fair game, IMO.[/quote]

Some changes have come out of necessity - injuries, but I have to say it was nice to see Collins on the sideline at the start of the game on Sunday, and then when he was in there - making plays almost exclusively around the line of scrimmage. Dare I say it was his best game so far?

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1297643]Some changes have come out of necessity - injuries, but I have to say it was nice to see Collins on the sideline at the start of the game on Sunday, and then when he was in there - making plays almost exclusively around the line of scrimmage. Dare I say it was his best game so far?[/quote]

+1

He didn't play an amazing game - but I saw him a couple times making stops around the LOS. I'm good with it. Less chasing receivers down the field, more stopping runs for short gains.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1297643]Some changes have come out of necessity - injuries, but I have to say it was nice to see Collins on the sideline at the start of the game on Sunday, and then when he was in there - making plays almost exclusively around the line of scrimmage. Dare I say it was his best game so far?[/quote]

Last off-season RR and his front office people tried to "fix" a young secondary that wasn't broken. They cut good young players and replaced them with older veterans who have failed to produce. The best of those young players was, of course, picked up by another team. Is that the way to build a team?

Now, they have turned a highly paid veteran player (Collins) into a role player.

RR has lost sight of what he was brought in to do which was to acquire and develop young players to build a perennial contender.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

William Jackson III is a legit CB1 imo .. just out of sync so far. Hes here to stay for a few more years and I think he will win over fans.

St Juste seems to be a good 3R pick so far.

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

[quote=SunnySide;1297646]William Jackson III is a legit CB1 imo .. just out of sync so far. Hes here to stay for a few more years and I think he will win over fans.

St Juste seems to be a good 3R pick so far.[/quote]

Agree

Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game
 

ST Juste is already better than Fuller