The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Without making any prognostications, we are the sleepy warrior. I started this thread because I didn't want to tag along with the thread that said our O line is crappy. We are the team to beat because, we hardly get any credit around the leauge. By the way I think our O line rocks! And I think Rabach is better than what some of you said about him. A good center is priceless commodity. Dockery pancakes, Brown squashes and Samuels is not overrated. And ummm Jansen.

Back to why we are the team to beat. We have the best coaching staff by far. We have Portis, Cooley, Moss, Patten, El, Lloyd and [I]ahhhem[/I] on the other side Daniels, Griffin, Salave'a(monster), Wynn, Evans and now Carter! Marshall, Washington, McCune(soon to be a household name for badass!) and need I go into our secondary.....you get the point.
We are the team to beat because we have Joe Gibbs, chemistry, precision, execution, and commraderie. None of the other 31 teams have it.
Hail!

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Our defense is downright scary. Seriously, if our playmakers and DT's stay healthy, we will be the defense feared by all. Offensively, we have versatility all over the place. Randle El, Cooley, a QB who can run, are enough to keep D's guessing. It has the makeup of a SB team. The one worry? Kicker.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[QUOTE]The one worry? Kicker.[/QUOTE]

I totally agree. This is going to be a gamble going into the season. The kicker can be a vital part of a team but a solid offense shold score whenever they are in the red zone so field goals should be at a minimum this year.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

I guess Mr. Novak isn't available anymore is he?

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=SkinsLove24/7]I totally agree. This is going to be a gamble going into the season. The kicker can be a vital part of a team but a solid offense shold score whenever they are in the red zone so field goals should be at a minimum this year.[/quote]Hall is almost automatic from the redzone. His problem is beyond 40, his accuracy drops substancially. We need a guy who can hit consitently from the 40-55 range.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

We dont need a kicker, we'll score a TD on every drive. Its the same reason why we don't need a punter. Hall can kick PATs so were fine.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

if Hall stays healthy we'll be fine, He's had the injury bug the last few seasons so lets all pray he is healthy and we won't have anything to worry about it

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

hall has been extremely unfortunate with injuries. Last year at the baltimore scrimmage he was perfect. I saw him kick atleast 40-50 times and he didn't miss one. HE was booting 60+ yard field goals consistantly. He started from 40 and worked his way back and didn't miss one. They were with one of the holding things though, not a place holder so maybe it was easier? He got injured and he dropped down. Lets hope for a healthy hall next year.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

gtripp hit the nail right on the head.like any championship team,if the redskins can avoid major injuries,the pieces of the puzzle are all lined up for the redskins to have a very sucessful season

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[QUOTE=GTripp0012]Hall is almost automatic from the redzone. His problem is beyond 40, his accuracy drops substancially. We need a guy who can hit consitently from the 40-55 range.[/QUOTE]
I've posted the stats in the past (several times), and they show (overwhelmingly!) that he is nowhere near as bad as people claim. The arguments that he is a bad kicker are completely unfounded. If you want to see a BAD kicking situation, see the years before Jon Hall came to DC.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

I guarantee you that at least 5 games this year will be decided by 3 points or less, even with our improved O. So Hall is a very important key to our season.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

In regards to Hall, I think we all get worried because of his health issues since joining with us.

I know that I had noticed last season on kickoffs, that it looked like he would stumble a bit after every kick. Sort of limping a little. That worried me. It just look like it took everything out of him to kick it that hard.

Where as he used to look like he could have done it 20 times in a row, without sweating.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

I definately think we are going to be a force to be reckoned with this year. All the haters seem to think we have a quarterback problem, but I beg to differ. If brunnel runs out of his "fountain of youth" juice than Campbell will be ready to step up and lead the team. If Hall is healthy, we should be fine. I still think we should have kept Novak, but I won't go there.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Hall in warm-ups.

I watched Janikowski warm up prior to the Raaaadarz game, and then Hall warmed up.

No comparison. Janikowski was booming them, Hall trotted up to the ball and tried to scare it over the crossbars.

He wasn't at his best all year long. But, hey, who is, after 20 plus weeks of FB!

Maybe one of the two other kickers in camp can show something, and push Hall to perform better.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Hall is my boy. I have clips of him doing 1) karate after a Taylor tackle 2) doing forward flips after HE tackled someone and 3) ALWAYS wearing hilarious sweatpants all the time.

What other Skin can you say that about?

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection]Hall is my boy. I have clips of him doing 1) karate after a Taylor tackle 2) doing forward flips after HE tackled someone and 3) ALWAYS wearing hilarious sweatpants all the time.

What other Skin can you say that about?[/quote]

:laughing2 :laughing2 :laughing2

I'd love to see that footage!!!

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

We have the highlights somewhere, the most obvious one is the karate.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection]3) ALWAYS wearing hilarious sweatpants all the time.[/quote]

hahaha... i can remember laughing at him wearing sweatpants during the oakland game. he's so white. haha.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

John Hall is the man for XP and FGs. We need to find a punter who can handle Kickoff duties and maybe make a TD saving tackle 3 or 4 times this year on special teams! That guy is not Derick Frost.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=cpayne5]I've posted the stats in the past (several times), and they show (overwhelmingly!) that he is nowhere near as bad as people claim. The arguments that he is a bad kicker are completely unfounded. If you want to see a BAD kicking situation, see the years before Jon Hall came to DC.[/quote]

Are you referencing Jose "The Conquistador" Cortez or Brett "Pig-face" Conway?

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=SKINSDUDE]I definately think we are going to be a force to be reckoned with this year. All the haters seem to think we have a quarterback problem, but I beg to differ. If brunnel runs out of his "fountain of youth" juice than Campbell will be ready to step up and lead the team. If Hall is healthy, we should be fine. I still think we should have kept Novak, but I won't go there.[/quote]Campbell wont make an impact this year. If he has to play, the offense will get real tight. But I think we are better off with Brunell than most NFL teams are with their QBs. He is STILL better than Leftwich at this point in their careers.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[I]does'nt matter what the vikes are gonna wear,they are gonna stink up the metrodome this year!!![/I]

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

The only knock I have on John Hall is the injury thing and they way he wears his helmet. I wish someone would show him that it is not a hockey helmet and the chin strap goes on your chin.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=CanadianSkin]The only knock I have on John Hall is the injury thing and they way he wears his helmet. I wish someone would show him that it is not a hockey helmet and the chin strap goes on your chin.[/quote]




Gee thanks, I never noticed that before. Now we have to replace him or that will bug me every time I see him.


[IMG]http://media.theinsiders.com/Media/College_Football/141847_hallwinsit400.JPG[/IMG]

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

holy crap an espn analyst agrees with this thread and i mean they are the experts :yeahright (however i do like jeremy green and not just for this post either)

[B]Majeed:[/B] YO JG answer me this. How do you see the NFC East shaping up? My buddy Mike thinks his Eagles will win the division. Your thoughts?

[IMG]http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/sn2.gif[/IMG] [B]Jeremy Green: [/B]I think the Eagles are the 4th best team in the Division right now based on the additions the other teams have made. I'm going to go with the Skins right now. There FA siginings this season made sense for a change and they found players that actually fit. They are going to be much more explosive with Saunders as the OC and the defense is solid.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=Hail2theskins]holy crap an espn analyst agrees with this thread and i mean they are the experts :yeahright (however i do like jeremy green and not just for this post either)

[B]Majeed:[/B] YO JG answer me this. How do you see the NFC East shaping up? My buddy Mike thinks his Eagles will win the division. Your thoughts?

[IMG]http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/sn2.gif[/IMG] [B]Jeremy Green: [/B]I think the Eagles are the 4th best team in the Division right now based on the additions the other teams have made. I'm going to go with the Skins right now. There FA siginings this season made sense for a change and they found players that actually fit. They are going to be much more explosive with Saunders as the OC and the defense is solid.[/quote]Wouldn't have said it better myself if I hadn't already.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

has that already been posted? if so i apologize for resubmitting

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Nah, that wasn't a repost. I was just commenting on how dead on he is.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Sorry guys to interrupt on your Hall thread, but I started this one and why we are the team to beat has little to do with our kicker. All we need is a K who gets 90% on PAT's and can hit 38-42yd FG's. The point of this thread was why we are the team to beat. A reply to the affect of our D allowing the least amount of scores in the red zone would be more along the lines of this thread. Not to be confrontational, but maybe you should have started a John Hall thread....or possibly who should be our kicker.

Hail

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=PhxRedSkin]Sorry guys to interrupt on your Hall thread, but I started this one and why we are the team to beat has little to do with our kicker. All we need is a K who gets 90% on PAT's and can hit 38-42yd FG's. The point of this thread was why we are the team to beat. A reply to the affect of our D allowing the least amount of scores in the red zone would be more along the lines of this thread. Not to be confrontational, but maybe you should have started a John Hall thread....or possibly who should be our kicker.

Hail[/quote]I'd hope we could get a kicker whos better than 90% on PATs. 96% or better.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Sorry Buster, I noticed the first time i saw him in a JETS uniform and it drove me nuts, so much so that my brother laughed at me when he was traded to the skins. But i respect the guys leg and talent and love his passion for the game and the Skins.

Hail!

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[QUOTE=skinsttw]I guarantee you that at least 5 games this year will be decided by 3 points or less, even with our improved O. So Hall is a very important key to our season.[/QUOTE]


I agree..The league is so competitive and balanced there are always going to be those close games decided by two or three points. Those 3 pointers have always been important to JG, and he's always had a good kicker. Hall's only problem has been injury. Let's hope he's healthy now and can remain that way throughout the season.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=PhxRedSkin]Sorry guys to interrupt on your Hall thread, but I started this one and why we are the team to beat has little to do with our kicker. All we need is a K who gets 90% on PAT's and can hit 38-42yd FG's. The point of this thread was why we are the team to beat. A reply to the affect of our D allowing the least amount of scores in the red zone would be more along the lines of this thread. Not to be confrontational, but maybe you should have started a John Hall thread....or possibly who should be our kicker.

Hail[/quote] Ha Have you seen my stappler,you took mw swingline stappler and i'd like it back please