Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

In his press conference tonight Coach Gibbs said " all of our backs can contribute. Rock, Mike, Betts, AND T.J Ducket" None of them are going anywhere. Add Lumsem or Manuel White. We are set

Again Gibbs, shows us all....IS obviously a JEDI!

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

It's possible we'll keep all those guys, but really what else would he say?

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

The force is strong with this team!!

Maybe that is what coach would say..But I see depth in natural athele's.
The key is that everyone contibutes.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

Special Teams is where Rock and Betts shine. I would rather have 5 running backs than 5 recievers.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Red Robert;207483]Special Teams is where Rock and Betts shine. I would rather have 5 running backs than 5 recievers.[/quote]

Are you being sarcastic? You need way more receivers than runningbacks. Offensive formations simply have a higher demand for WR. Then there is of course the depth issues, such as last years Seattle game.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Red Robert;207476]In his press conference tonight Coach Gibbs said " all of our backs can contribute. Rock, Mike, Betts, AND T.J Ducket" None of them are going anywhere. Add Lumsem or Manuel White. We are set

Again Gibbs, shows us all....IS obviously a JEDI![/quote]


Yeah... I really don't think we're keeping more running backs on the roster than wide receivers, simply because in some plays more wide receivers are used, and we need them for depth. I mean, did you really expect Gibbs to say something along the lines of,"well now that we have Duckett, we're probably gonna get rid of Betts or Cartwright."

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Red Robert;207483]Special Teams is where Rock and Betts shine. I would rather have 5 running backs than 5 recievers.[/quote]

5 WRs is the bare minimum for a Saunders offense.

I see us keeping 4 RBs and 2 FBs. Portis, Duckett, Betts, Cartwright at RB; and Sellers and Manny White at FB.

Lumsden could hit the practice squad.

I thought Nemo may have had a shot to make the team, but he fumbled yet again. I think he's a goner now.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=mooby;207488]Yeah... I really don't think we're keeping more running backs on the roster than wide receivers, simply because in some plays more wide receivers are used, and we need them for depth. I mean, did you really expect Gibbs to say something along the lines of,"well now that we have Duckett, we're probably gonna get rid of Betts or Cartwright."[/quote]

I think we'll keep Cartwright and Duckett. Rock is valuable on special teams, Gibbs loves that. And I think the whole reason to get Duckett was because he was nervous about the health of Portis and Betts. It's insurance.

Probably means we're only keeping 2 TEs, or maybe Gibbs will make GW do with one less LB. Neither Kevin Simon nor Spencer Havner have done anything to stand out. I was figuring one of them would make the squad but now it's not looking that way to me.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

Honestly, with how poor our backup offensive line has played, I could see us carrying less backups for a game than we ussually would have? I could see us carrying all those guys and having less guys at another position.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

Also, didn't Rock just sign a contract extention last year?

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

Cartwright could be kept and listed as FB.

I see the RB spot possibly shaping up like this: Portis, Betts, Duckett.

At FB: Cartwright, Sellers.

I can't see us keeping more than 5 players at these two spots. I think White and Nemo are as good as gone.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

The more I think about it the more it seems White is gone, in addition to Nemo being gone. White just hasn't done that much.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

I'm down with that. Maybe it'll stop the bitching among Betts and Cartwright.

Nemo LOVES to fumble. I've seen a couple flashes against third stringers, but I'd rather have our guys who've proven something.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

I read something this morning that reminded me of a similar situation we've had here.

We ran a 3-headed monster at RB in 1991 with Byner/Ervins/Riggs. Perhaps that what Gibbs has in mind this year. Portis is the main guy, Betts change of pace, and Duckett the bruiser.

Sounds like a plan to me!

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

I'm feeling really good about this.
I don't think Joe makes this move unless he senses he's ready for a SB run.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Schneed10;207497]5 WRs is the bare minimum for a Saunders offense.

I see us keeping 4 RBs and 2 FBs. Portis, Duckett, Betts, Cartwright at RB; and Sellers and Manny White at FB.

Lumsden could hit the practice squad.

I thought Nemo may have had a shot to make the team, but he fumbled yet again. I think he's a goner now.[/quote]

i've seen nothing to indicate white will make the team. we probably will keep robert johnson at TE, and he or duckett could possibly work as FBs if needed.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=That Guy;207841]i've seen nothing to indicate white will make the team. we probably will keep robert johnson at TE, and he or duckett could possibly work as FBs if needed.[/quote]

White may be kept on the practice squad. He appears to have potential, but is not as good as Sellars or Cartwright. I think Rock should pack back on a few pounds and resume the fullback role.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Mattyk72;207522]I read something this morning that reminded me of a similar situation we've had here.

We ran a 3-headed monster at RB in 1991 with Byner/Ervins/Riggs. Perhaps that what Gibbs has in mind this year. Portis is the main guy, Betts change of pace, and Duckett the bruiser.

Sounds like a plan to me![/quote]

Gibbs continues to build this team in the image of his past teams. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

i mean gibbs wasn't going to go, OH that guy? Yeah, we're going to cut that piece of shit next week. Ha ha, Saunders and me and are going to cut off his pay check until he notices that he isn't wanted. Its going to be some funny shit.

Gibbs was just being nice. Who knows what will happen. I say, we find a trade for rock or ladell. If none is available say goodbye to jesse and keep both of them. Simple as that. I think rock contributes least to this team but i haven't seen enough of lumsden to say he is worthy of a spot.

Portis, duckett, and one more available each week with one inactive every week. If one of the big dogs go down just make them inactive and move up the other guy. I say lumsden is a great back-up to all of them due to his size and speed. Rock, as good as he is, isn't a really valuable backup who can step in for betts or duckett if needed because of his size.

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

the redskins will not carry 5 running backs...when they have to get down to 53 you will see ladell betts being traded

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=BigSKINBauer;207906]i mean gibbs wasn't going to go, OH "that guy"? Yeah, we're going to cut that piece of shit next week. Ha ha.[/quote]

:(

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[QUOTE=That Guy;208011]:([/QUOTE]

Matty needs to see you....bring your playbook

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

The Turk has spoken!

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Red Robert;207476]In his press conference tonight Coach Gibbs said " all of our backs can contribute. Rock, Mike, Betts, AND T.J Ducket" None of them are going anywhere. Add Lumsem or Manuel White. [/quote]

How many recievers will the Redskins take to the regular season?

Re: Redskins will carry 5 backs!
 

[quote=Red Robert;208214]How many recievers will the Redskins take to the regular season?[/quote]I'm thinking 5. Espy has a chance. But I'm thinking 5.