Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=22722)

SFREDSKIN 02-28-2008 06:33 PM

Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Skins should sign both, especially Olivea. He was a pretty good OL and is still young. [url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3269531]ESPN - Chargers' Neal, McCree, Olivea enter free-agent market - NFL[/url]

Campbell17 02-28-2008 06:38 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Wouldn't mind seeing us pick up Neal, Olivea isnt bad either.

Dirtbag59 02-28-2008 06:55 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Oh God, another chance for Warpath members to bash Mike Sellers who has been nothing but productive the past few years. Don't know what kind of salary Olivea would want, so I'll wait to see on him.

Sorry Mike Sellers [IMG]http://www.theradiotrip.com/resources/images/sound_bites_images/Miscellaneous/rodney_dangerfield_tn.jpg[/IMG]

Dirtyskin21 02-28-2008 06:57 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
neal, yes..

SmootSmack 02-28-2008 07:19 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
The guy in that headline I'd take, if I had to choose one, would be McCree

Neal is 37 and coming off a broken leg. I would have liked him back in 1998, not now.

MTK 02-28-2008 07:23 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Where's the vet min people... c'mon now don't let me down!

Defensewins 02-28-2008 07:58 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Lorenzo Neal is strictly a blocker and an incredibly gifted blocker.
He is not very good at anything else.
He has hands of stone, 8 receptions for 23 yards for the entire year of 2007.
In our system the FB has to be a good receiver Mr. Neal sucks as a receiver. He is not suited for our system.
Shane Olivea is an interesting player only 26 years old.

BrunellMVP? 02-28-2008 08:00 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
What's wrong with iron mike?

Stacks42 02-28-2008 08:03 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[quote=Mattyk72;427313]Where's the vet min people... c'mon now don't let me down![/quote]

Ive got your back.

Hey maybe we should sign both of the for the vet min, what do you guys think?

Dirtbag59 02-28-2008 08:13 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[quote=BrunellMVP?;427321]What's wrong with iron mike?[/quote]

He isn't rated 90+ on Madden.

mooby 02-28-2008 08:24 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
We have no need for Neal, maybe if that is a position of need but Big Mike has been holding it down pretty good. And Olivea is probably gonna handle a hefty sized contract, he's young and he's good and that equals a big payday in free agency.

Dirtbag59 02-28-2008 08:37 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[quote=mooby;427326]We have no need for Neal, maybe if that is a position of need but Big Mike has been holding it down pretty good. And Olivea is probably gonna handle a hefty sized contract, he's young and he's good and that equals a big payday in free agency.[/quote]

Adam Schefner had a pretty profound quote on NFL Total Access. He said something along the lines of "those teams that don't do well in the draft are forced to overpay for players in Free agency."

skinsfan69 02-28-2008 08:47 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Why don't we just sign everyone's rejects. We have NO NEED for a 37 year old FB coming off a broken leg. I'm sure he's 100% healthy but we have Sellers and he can do the job. I don't know much about Olivea other than I believe he's been an effective starter along a pretty good O-line.

prinzeofmoval 02-28-2008 08:51 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
neal has at best 2 years left...i follow the chargers pretty good out here and the guy legs are just gone..but if we can steal him take him.

hagams 02-28-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
We don't need a damn fullback....unless it's at vet min:)

Ruhskins 02-28-2008 09:06 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[QUOTE=Dirtbag359;427309]Oh God, another chance for Warpath members to bash Mike Sellers who has been nothing but productive the past few years. Don't know what kind of salary Olivea would want, so I'll wait to see on him.

Sorry Mike Sellers [IMG]http://www.theradiotrip.com/resources/images/sound_bites_images/Miscellaneous/rodney_dangerfield_tn.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

Poor Sellers, I thought he was popular with ppl. This is the second or third thread for a FB, which is crazy!! We have bigger needs than a FB, which we can pick up (a second) FB late in the draft.

steveo395 02-28-2008 09:24 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
Mike Sellers is one of the best fullbacks in the league. He was the first alternate to the pro bowl for a reason. Anyone who thinks we should replace him is retarded. He can run, catch, and block well.

theJBexperience 02-28-2008 09:26 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
I'm not sure that people want to replace Big Mike but would rather have more depth at the FB position

Dirtbag59 02-28-2008 09:32 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[quote=theJBexperience;427350]I'm not sure that people want to replace Big Mike but would rather have more depth at the FB position[/quote]

You'd be surprised. If I hadn't seen this before I would agree with you, but recently more and more people are lobbying to get a new FB to replace Sellers. Which in theory would be great, because Sellers is a very good player, so to find a better player would be awesome.

The craziest thing I hear is that Sellers can't block over the middle. Which I could believe if:

1. I saw it during the 12 or 13 games I got a chance to watch live from start to finish (Sopcast started to screw me over near the end of the season thank God for the new system of selecting Prime Time games during the second half of the season, the other games I watch the gametrek on NFL.com), or

2. Heard it from a respected analyst.

That Guy 02-28-2008 10:19 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
fb is not a need, and if we sign one, it should be a 23 year old in the draft, not a 37 year old that's 180 degrees from what we need for the WCO.

mccree is another average player. signing him really doesn't improve the team much beyond depth, though if he's cheap, he's definitely worth a look there.

olivea is good depth and young enough to stick around a while, but i have no idea how much money he wants (which directly affects how much i'd want to sign him), and he wants to start, so we're not exactly his best option (besides that season ending OL curse we've been developing).

SFREDSKIN 02-28-2008 11:02 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
We need a proven backup FB that's why I posted this. Sellers is "the man" no doubt. If he gets hurt, then what? Remember the 2007 season when BIG Mike was hurt? Our backups couldn't do the job and it showed during the losses.

Dirtyskin21 02-28-2008 11:43 PM

Re: Shane Olivea and Lorenzo Neal cut
 
[QUOTE=mooby;427326]We have no need for Neal, maybe if that is a position of need but Big Mike has been holding it down pretty good. And Olivea is probably gonna handle a hefty sized contract, he's young and he's good and that equals a big payday in free agency.[/QUOTE]



actually, we are gonna need two starting FB's for the WCO.. ITs gonna require mike to do a lot more work I believe..


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.41258 seconds with 9 queries