No Moore Kareem
 

Released

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Nice thread title.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

who?

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

I hope he doesn't take the wrong angle towards the exit door of Redskins Park.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

damn shame. I mean, I'm not saying he shouldn't be released, just a shame he couldn't maintain his health & a decent level of play. He looked pretty good at times, but never that much as a full time starter.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=GMScud;859813]Nice thread title.[/quote]

Other options were

Quote The Redskins, Never Moore

Skins Don't Need Moore Help at Safety

The Kareem Rises To The Waiver Wire

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

I felt like when he got a chance early last year he played well, unfortunately Doughty can make even the best of them (Landry/Atogwe) look terrible.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859820]Other options were

Quote The Redskins, Never Moore

Skins Don't Need Moore Help at Safety

The Kareem Rises To The [B]Waiver Wire[/B][/quote]

thought he was released? :)

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859820]Other options were

Quote The Redskins, Never Moore

Skins Don't Need Moore Help at Safety

The Kareem Rises To The Waiver Wire[/quote]

Nice... You should change your name to SmoothSmack.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

The mustard era at backup safety has officially begun.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859820]Quote The Redskins, Never Moore[/quote]


Since Edgar Allen Poe's work is incredible, I'm partial to this heading. Change it please. :)

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=NC_Skins;859838]Since Edgar Allen Poe's work is incredible, I'm partial to this heading. Change it please. :)[/quote]

Seconded.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Well there goes our season.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

More Doughty at free safety is a bad thing in the event of Atogwe's continued absence.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Moore had a terrible season last year, but he showed flashes. I thought the potential was there for him to be serviceable as a starter and a good backup at FS. I still have no idea as to why Reed Doughty is still being marched out as the starting FS with Atogwe out, at least give Gomes a shot, and I really have a hard team believing that Doughty is a better option at FS than Moore. Perhaps the coaching staff was not too confident with Moore's knee.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=RMSkins;859858]Moore had a terrible season last year, but he showed flashes. I thought the potential was there for him to be serviceable as a starter and a good backup at FS. I still have no idea as to why Reed Doughty is still being marched out as the starting FS with Atogwe out, at least give Gomes a shot, and I really have a hard team believing that Doughty is a better option at FS than Moore. Perhaps the coaching staff was not too confident with Moore's knee.[/quote]

So continues our team's continuing practice of putting strong safeties with poor coverage skills at the free safety position. Atogwe's injuries has really screwed up the secondary and not having a safety with good coverage skills is not helping the situation. Given that they are trying out young guys, I would say put Gomes out there if he has any coverage skills.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Hate bringing up ST#21, but the day he died was the day our FS problems began; and we've never since replaced him with a decent option.

Hopefully we can get (via draft) a FS this year in the 2-3rd round.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Here I'm thinking championship after picking up Stallworth and then the team throws this news at me......:Flush:

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=vallin21;859895]Hate bringing up ST#21, but the day he died was the day our FS problems began; and we've never since replaced him with a decent option.

Hopefully we can get (via draft) a FS this year in the 2-3rd round.[/quote]


Yeah I hate when people still bring it up also.

For the life of me I can't figure out what makes the Skins coaches think Landry or Doughty are decent FS's or could even play the position. I think it has been atleast 5 yrs now most of us fans complain about the lack of coverage skills by the two. Both are suited for SS in the box attacking the QB or RB.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

Everybody here's bein hard on Doughty as a FS, but teams have not beat us deep much w/him there. Sure he's limited & doesn't often make plays on the ball. Overall, coverage has not been our problem during this losing streak IMO.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

If you want quality starting free safeties, you usually have to commit a high draft pick(3rd round or higher) or make a FA signing. Just the nature of the beast. Dwell on that for a moment.

[QUOTE=Ruhskins;859860]So continues our team's continuing practice of putting strong safeties with poor coverage skills at the free safety position. Atogwe's injuries has really screwed up the secondary and not having a safety with good coverage skills is not helping the situation. Given that they are trying out young guys, I would say put Gomes out there if he has any coverage skills.[/QUOTE]

They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? No idea who our left tackle would be

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=freddyg12;859899]Everybody here's bein hard on Doughty as a FS, but teams have not beat us deep much w/him there. Sure he's limited & doesn't often make plays on the ball. Overall, coverage has not been our problem during this losing streak IMO.[/quote]

Yeah I think doughty gets more hate then he should. He's not a starting caliber saftey but he's done decent. I have much bigger problems w our corners then I do w reed.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859919]They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? No idea who our left tackle would be[/quote]

As much as id love to have berry can you imagine our outrage if we drafted a saftey (even as good as berry) over tw or okung? There would have been a riot.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=mlmpetert;859945]As much as id love to have berry can you imagine our outrage if we drafted a saftey (even as good as berry) over tw or okung? There would have been a riot.[/quote]

Everyone would have been definitely aching over Okung. Not many Skins' fans wanted Trent, from my limited knowledge of the situation. Heck, folks might have said "we should have drafted Clausen". :laughing-

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859919]They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? [B]No idea who our left tackle would be[/B][/quote]

McNabb :)

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SirClintonPortis;859951]Everyone would have been definitely aching over Okung. Not many Skins' fans wanted Trent, from my limited knowledge of the situation. Heck, folks might have said "we should have drafted Clausen". :laughing-[/quote]

Man I'd pretty much forgotten Okung what's his status?

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=NC_Skins;859838]Since Edgar Allen Poe's work is incredible, I'm partial to this heading. Change it please. :)[/quote]

A fellow Poe admirer. Nice. Just read "Hop Frog"

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859919][B]They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.[/B]

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? No idea who our left tackle would be[/quote]

At FS I take it? I know they intended to play him at FS when he was drafted, but man that's a big jump for him. Can't see that playin Romo & co. this week. Seems more a SS. Instincts seem good though, he's a ball player if nothing else.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=The Goat;859959]Man I'd pretty much forgotten Okung what's his status?[/quote]

He's been injured a couple of times, but he's been getting good reviews the time that he has played. Matt Williamson from Football Today raves about him at times.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=freddyg12;860258]At FS I take it? I know they intended to play him at FS when he was drafted, but man that's a big jump for him. Can't see that playin Romo & co. this week. Seems more a SS. Instincts seem good though, he's a ball player if nothing else.[/quote]

Well I think if Landry is out on Sunday it could be Atogwe and Gomes starting. Maybe

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859919]They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? No idea who our left tackle would be[/quote]


Heyer? ....LOLOLOLOL



Also, Berry would be on the IR right now so we'd be down a safety and a decent LT.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Paintrain;859818]I hope he doesn't take the wrong angle towards the exit door of Redskins Park.[/quote]

:laughing2 That's awesome!

As to the thread...meh. I mean, I rooted for him; more because he was young than because I thought he was going to be awesome. That's about the most I can say for Kareem More.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;860266]Well I think if Landry is out on Sunday it could be Atogwe and Gomes starting. Maybe[/quote]

Wait, what's wrong with Landry?

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Ruhskins;860278]Wait, what's wrong with Landry?[/quote]


Achilles.


[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/post/quick-hits-london-fletcher-laron-landry-miss-practice-with-injuries/2011/11/16/gIQA9COsRN_blog.html]Quick hits: London Fletcher, LaRon Landry miss practice with injuries - The Insider - The Washington Post[/url]

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Ruhskins;860278]Wait, what's wrong with Landry?[/quote]

coverage skills.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=That Guy;860285]coverage skills.[/quote]

[YT]bcYppAs6ZdI[/YT]

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

how about

No moore kareem of the crop

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=That Guy;860285]coverage skills.[/quote]

And tackling and talks smack when other team makes a play. He is a Sean Taylor divided by a thousand.