Dissed on SNF
 

Did anyone else cath them say where only 4 undefeated teams and the showed a graphic listing
Buccaneers 3-0
Colts 3-0
Bengal 3-0
Chiefs 2-0
They even said are only 4 undefeateds left.
I almost threw remote through screen Theisman was sitin right there and said nothing. Just wondering if anyone else saw it.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I did not see that, but I did see a couple of pre-game shows who were asking the question "of the 2-0 teams, which would most likely not make the playoffs"? Unfortunately, we were named each time!

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=mattdouthat]Did anyone else cath them say where only 4 undefeated teams and the showed a graphic listing
Buccaneers 3-0
Colts 3-0
Bengal 3-0
Chiefs 2-0
They even said are only 4 undefeateds left.
I almost threw remote through screen Theisman was sitin right there and said nothing. Just wondering if anyone else saw it.[/QUOTE]

THATS SO FUNNY! :headbange I saw and reacted the exact same way ... I was thinking they were talking about teams playing in week 3, but who knows...

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I saw that, I was like uhh hello?!

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

ME TOO! I wanted to post that today. I was like, "Dude, WTF."

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

If we get to 3-0 this week, then there will be some talk. Gotta win this week at home, the crowd has to bring it again like they did in week 1.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=Sociofan]I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?[/QUOTE]

Awesome post.:biggthump

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Yeah I saw that. Whatever, but it really dosent help anyones opinion of a biasness against the skins in the media. Whatever, after were 3-0 maybe they will know.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Yeah I saw it. Most rediculous thing I've seen. But I forgot whats his name not Joe or Paul Mcguire the one who talks all the time. He said that the Chiefs have a bye week this week to. Guess somehow there not playing tonight.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

we'll get love if we show we can be a two sided threat... if we play 60minutes like that last 4, everyone will be singing about us. If we have more games with 50yards rushing and under 150 passing, no one will care.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[url]http://www.nfl.com/standings[/url]

nuff said.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Yeah, and the first thing I thought was "Hey, Theismann, correct that graphic!"

Then I realized it really doesn't change the fact that we're undefeated, and I want us to stay stealth until it's really obvious.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=Daseal]You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.[/QUOTE]

Correct. Winning will shut a lot of people up and get us noticed. The win over Dallas was great, but truthfully, we have a long way to go to prove the naysayers wrong. I can't really blame any commentator for saying we're most likely not to make the playoffs. Do we really look like a playoff team yet?

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=Daseal]You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.[/QUOTE]

i agree OAK has played 3 games against 3 tough teams and come close each time. they might be the best winless team out there.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

we have two wins...against the bears and cowboys. And while a win against the cowboys means a lot to us, they were still a 6-10 team last year.

Even if we beat the Seahawks, we are going to have to beat them with out offense for people to start to say anything about us. And rightfully so.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=jbcjr14]If we get to 3-0 this week, then there will be some talk. Gotta win this week at home, the crowd has to bring it again like they did in week 1.[/QUOTE]

If we get to 3-0, you will see people (non-fans) starting to get on the wagon

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=Hog1]If we get to 3-0, you will see people (non-fans) starting to get on the wagon[/QUOTE]
Agreed. But I still think the media will play it down. I look forward to 4-0. THAT'S when Gibbs will start to become "Gibbs" again to these pundits in the media. Jackasses.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Yeah, Oakland is one of the best 0-3 teams I've seen this season! ;-)

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I don't see how we deserve the kind of respect that is reserved for elite teams, what seems to have been swept under the rug in the dallas 9er game, is the 31 points san fran put up against the boy's, san fran with Tim Rattay pushed dallas all over the place, we were lucky to score at all against dallas, and we are looking for respect? I think it's better that we earn it, rather than beg for it. Our record is not a good barometer of our play, and that's why people are glossing over our team, and our record, as a legitimate contender.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Not sure if it was a respect thing. No matter how a team wins, if it hasn't lost a game, the team's undefeated.

True though, until we start winning back to back games, scoring over 20 points a game, and winning by a margin larger than two, it's going to be tough to get respect.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I saw the graphic and was a little pissed, but whatever--as I've said before, I'd much rather be underestimated and slip under folks radar than be hyped-up by these clowns.

And it's true that all we've done is beat two under .500 teams from last year; the Seagulls are a playoff team. And then we've got some very tough road games in Denver and KC. So we've got a ways to go before we deserve the hype.

But still, we are undefeated, the graphic was about undefeated teams, and KC was on there at 2-0. We're giving up an average of 10 points a game. Isn't that something??? And we won on the road. So f*** em, and let's just keep proving the nay-sayers wrong. Step one: beat Seattle.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

we are undefeated therefore we should be on the graphic, i don't care if we cheated to win, we are undefeated and therefore we should be on the graphic. Respect has nothing to do with it, us winning by 3 points instead of losing by three points has NOTHING to do with it. It is bull shit and i wish theismann said something. I haven't heard him talk about the skins since he bet against us in the dallas game.

We won by 3 total points this year. I couldn't care less. We won. People don't give us respect for losing by less than a TD over and over but when we win it is a fluke??? It must balance out, we lose some close games and now we win some close games. It is not like we sucked last year it is just that we couldn't get the 3 or 4 points we needed to pick up a win. Now that we are picking up those points we deserve as much positive respect as we got negitive last year

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=Sociofan]I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?[/QUOTE]

I think we've been down this road before. If we get pass Kansas City, Denver, Giants and Eagles we deserve respect. Our divison games are key to getting the respect we deserve.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=offiss]I don't see how we deserve the kind of respect that is reserved for elite teams, what seems to have been swept under the rug in the dallas 9er game, is the 31 points san fran put up against the boy's, san fran with Tim Rattay pushed dallas all over the place, we were lucky to score at all against dallas, and we are looking for respect? I think it's better that we earn it, rather than beg for it. Our record is not a good barometer of our play, and that's why people are glossing over our team, and our record, as a legitimate contender.[/QUOTE]

They were listing all the undefeated's and left us out I wouldn't over analyze it. I think people are making alot out of nothing multiple playoff teams already have losses.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

Ofcourse we weren't ranked with them, i forgot we are 1-1!
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/listranker?id=345[/url]

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

that is ridiculous. That is disgracful and unprofesional to post records that arent true.

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

I can't believe this, i just can't it is stupidity, really, I think most of here could chant off the records of each team without any help, they just have to look at the standings on their own site

Re: Dissed on SNF
 

[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]Ofcourse we weren't ranked with them, i forgot we are 1-1!
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/listranker?id=345[/url][/QUOTE]

Now it all makes sense too me.....they just went to sleep before the end of the game last monday.