Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
This is what happens when you take in 10K suggestions or whatever it was lol
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1281375][IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]
Redwolves fans are crying.. Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT[/QUOTE]Where is this? I can't find it on their site? Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
If that poll is by the WFT, my guess is they are simply winnowing out the least likely by putting warriors against a bunch of non-starters. Probably will see a slew of these and eventually get to some form of redwolves vs warriors.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
DCFC sounds cool
That way Redskins still not replaced |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1281379]Where is this? I can't find it on their site?
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote] Out of this list - 1) The Washington Warriors 2) Washington Renegades |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1273557]Maybe Mac Jones in the draft if he falls to the 2nd round (doubtful).[/quote]
No way. A team would trade back up to bottom of 1st round to get him a 5th year, $30M savings when you consider current QB contracts. If he fell that far. If he was sitting untaken beginning of day 2, would be trade ups top of 2nd round. |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=skinsfaninok;1281375][IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]
Redwolves fans are crying.. Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT[/quote] There's MORE (total garbage)! Source: [url]https://twitter.com/JPFinlayNBCS/status/1382496846250119168[/url] [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-djbLWEAQl8PW?format=jpg&name=large[/img] |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Redvolves or Warriors or don't change. What happened to Redtails? I liked that one.
The WORST is Washington Capital City Football Club (CCFC). WTF at Wayfarers, Monarchs, Rubies and Rising. I'd rather stay Football Team than most of these choices. |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Just keep WFT if those are the options
Rubies? Swift? Capital City? WTF? |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=MTK;1281395]Just keep WFT if those are the options
Rubies? Swift? Capital City? WTF?[/quote] If we are Rubies i swear i am done with this team , that will be the final nail. |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Does anyone really refer to DC as Capital City?
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
I don't see any way they change it now, even if they "Picked one" it would piss off so many other fans... They will keep it WFT
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=Monkeydad;1281393]There's MORE (total garbage)!
Source: [url]https://twitter.com/JPFinlayNBCS/status/1382496846250119168[/url] [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-djbLWEAQl8PW?format=jpg&name=large[/img][/quote] From this list 1) Redwolves rest are garbage.... |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Honestly nothing will replace Redskins... Redwolves, Warriors , Wolves etc are all dumb.
The Washington Football Team is clean and timeless, put the W on the helmet and call it done. |
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
[quote=Scalper;1281384]No way. A team would trade back up to bottom of 1st round to get him a 5th year, $30M savings when you consider current QB contracts.
If he fell that far. If he was sitting untaken beginning of day 2, would be trade ups top of 2nd round.[/quote] LOL, yeah I think I posted this back in the beginning of January dude. Things have obviously changed since then with Mr. Mac Jones... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.