Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=Ruhskins;1222112]Dude, read reports from some of the more reliable Skins beat reporters, there were a lot of people in the FO who wanted Haskins. A vintage Snyder move would have been to move up to take Haskins or Jones.[/quote]
They even said tonight that the football side of the organization didn't like Haskins that much and wanted to draft other needs. The FO side (specifically mentioned Bruce and Dan) loved him and mentioned that Dan only went to one interview and it was his. This reeks of a Snyder/Allen move. You will NEVER EVER convince me otherwise. |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=NC_Skins;1222256]They even said tonight that the football side of the organization didn't like Haskins that much and wanted to draft other needs. The FO side (specifically mentioned Bruce and Dan) loved him and mentioned that Dan only went to one interview and it was his.
This reeks of a Snyder/Allen move. You will NEVER EVER convince me otherwise.[/quote] I'm just saying what reliable beat reporters have said: JP, Keim, Craig Hoffman. |
Re: The Rage Thread
Both sides got what they wanted. Dan and Bruce got Haskins and the football side got Sweat. I would guess having a split opinion in war rooms is pretty common.
Funny how all the pre draft hoopla about the Skins trading up went absolutely nowhere. |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=MTK;1222393]Both sides got what they wanted. Dan and Bruce got Haskins and the football side got Sweat. I would guess having a split opinion in war rooms is pretty common.
[B]Funny how all the pre draft hoopla about the Skins trading up went absolutely nowhere.[/B][/quote] I'm convinced this was done to eff with the Giants. LOL. |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=Ruhskins;1222394]I'm convinced this was done to eff with the Giants. LOL.[/quote]
[URL="https://giantswire.usatoday.com/2019/04/26/new-york-giants-were-absolutely-convinced-redskins-would-take-daniel-jones/"]And it worked too apparently[/URL] Suckers |
Re: The Rage Thread
I LOVE this thread......wonder why though?
|
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=MTK;1222396][URL="https://giantswire.usatoday.com/2019/04/26/new-york-giants-were-absolutely-convinced-redskins-would-take-daniel-jones/"]And it worked too apparently[/URL]
Suckers[/quote] [IMG]https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg[/IMG] Giants could have avoided this mess by taking a QB last year. And that's why you don't pass up on a QB. |
Re: The Rage Thread
Gruden wanted Daniel Jones, so I think the Giants weren't wrong thinking that we would have nabbed him at 15.
|
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=los panda;1222412]Gruden wanted Daniel Jones, so I think the Giants weren't wrong thinking that we would have nabbed him at 15.[/quote]
True, but the Giants had enough ammo to jump ahead of the Redskins and still get a top 10 talent. |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=Ruhskins;1222414]True, but the Giants had enough ammo to jump ahead of the Redskins and still get a top 10 talent.[/quote]
This is true. I'm loving what they're doing up there in NY. |
Re: The Rage Thread
/nypost.com/2019/04/26/some-experts-loved-the-giants-drafting-daniel-jones-seriously/
Good read. |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=los panda;1222415]This is true. I'm loving what they're doing up there in NY.[/quote]
So am I.:food-smil:food-smil |
Re: The Rage Thread
[quote=Giantone;1222430]/nypost.com/2019/04/26/some-experts-loved-the-giants-drafting-daniel-jones-seriously/
Good read.[/quote] Typical Giants apologist. |
Re: The Rage Thread
Has Eli said anything...or is this a situation where he has to get his brother/dad to make a statement for him again?
|
Re: The Rage Thread
No rage from me. They didn't trade up to get Haskins and said no to Rosen. Sweat is icing on the cake.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.