2006 NFC Predictions
 

I was talking to a Dallas Cowgirl fan the other day arguing who is a better coach Gibbs or Parcells. His argument for Parcells was weak and I ended up [font=Helv][size=2][font=Verdana]guaranteeing[/font] [/size][/font]him the the 'Skins will finish no lower than #2 in the NFC East. I really believe this now that:

[b][u]Internal Reasons[/u][/b]
1.We have Saunders designing/calling the plays. Which should put us in the top 5 in offense. (Portis, Cooley, Moss, Patten) yes I said Patten

2. G. Williams is back and has learned alot(how to influence players) from Gibbs. *** He is our future coach so the system will stay the same.

3. All of our core players are signed for awhile(and they believe)

[b][u]External Reasons[/u][/b]

1. NY Giants only won the NFC East title because of an [u]extra[/u] home game.(Eli Manning has been exposed. Stop Tiki= Stop Giants)

2. The Eagles will be better but never like they were a few years past.
(They need a #1, #2, #3 receiver) The defense sucked with all of its starters.

3. Cowboys just suck. (even if they get TO, look who is throwing the ball)


[b][u]My Concerns of not being #1 in East[/u][/b]

1. Jason Campbell- We dont now how this is going to pan out. (Can he handle the blitz, will he gel with the receivers, is he NFL ready)

2. We need another #2 receiver in the offseason. Patten is a #2. But we need another just for good measure.


Am I wrong for making such a prediction so early or is it just me that feels we are looking at a Super Bowl in the next 2 years?

***Doesnt it feel good to see people try and JUMP on the 'Skins bandwagon since Gibbs is back.lol.lol.lol. (aka: Peter King)

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

I honestly belive that we can be NFC Champions next year pending our offseason goes alright as far as the cap is concerned. I really think we have a window of opprotunity right now that we must take advantage of.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

all depends on if brunell can hold up/campbell is ready to start

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

it's early to be discussing this. but i think the Eagles are still the team to beat. Donovan healthy makes Todd Pinkston look like he belongs in the NFL. And lets me honest, my little sister can take a hit more like a man than that faggot.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

HA! That's hilarious.

I TRULY doubt the Eagles will be a contender though. NFC East will be wide open with the Cowboys looking to be in the cellar.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

16-0!!

It's January, let's talk in August.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

eagles have a really good QB and a good staff, so they'll always be a threat of some kind.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

we will be the number 1 seed in the NFC

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

I just dont see anyone stopping us from being the NFC East champs but ourselves.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

I know it's a little early for this considering Free Agency and the Draft hasnt begun yet but here is my Pre- FA/Draft predictions for the NFC.

1.Seahawks 13-3
2.Redskins 12-4
3.Panthers 11-5
4.Vikings 10-6
5.Giants 10-6
6.Falcons 9-7
7.Buccaneers 9-7
8.Eagles 9-7
9.Cardinals 8-8
10.Cowboys 8-8
11.Bears 8-8
12.Packers 7-9
13.Rams 7-9
14.Saints 6-10
15.Lions 6-10
16.49ERS 5-11

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

You dont think we can get that last win to over take the seaweeds?lol.lol.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

[QUOTE=RMSkins]I know it's a little early for this considering Free Agency and the Draft hasnt begun yet but here is my Pre- FA/Draft predictions for the NFC.

1.Seahawks 13-3
2.Redskins 12-4
3.Panthers 11-5
4.Vikings 10-6
5.Giants 10-6
6.Falcons 9-7
7.Buccaneers 9-7
8.Eagles 9-7
9.Cardinals 8-8
10.Cowboys 8-8
11.Bears 8-8
12.Packers 7-9
13.Rams 7-9
14.Saints 6-10
15.Lions 6-10
16.49ERS 5-11[/QUOTE]

I think the Seahags are a one hit wonder. They did look rather impressive against the Panthers though.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

[QUOTE=skinsguy]I think the Seahags are a one hit wonder. They did look rather impressive against the Panthers though.[/QUOTE]

Frankly, the Skins D played Seattle much tougher than Carolina. We're left to wonder what might have been had Carlos Rogers not dropped the INT for a 10-0 Skins lead. I'll say this - if we get a rematch, Al Saunders won't be nearly so conservative as Gibbs was in Seattle. Their weak link on defense is the secondary, and Gibbs didn't try to exploit that until they were down 2 TDs. It would be sweet if the Skins could get home field, but as bad as the NFC West is, Seattle could go 13-3 or 14-2 next year.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

I think the best preparation for the playoffs is the NFC East. Once we come out no less than #2, we should have no problems in the playoffs. With our offense being wide open next year, Seattle wont have a chance.

Re: 2006 NFC Predictions
 

[QUOTE=SouperMeister]Frankly, the Skins D played Seattle much tougher than Carolina. We're left to wonder what might have been had Carlos Rogers not dropped the INT for a 10-0 Skins lead. I'll say this - if we get a rematch, Al Saunders won't be nearly so conservative as Gibbs was in Seattle. Their weak link on defense is the secondary, and Gibbs didn't try to exploit that until they were down 2 TDs. It would be sweet if the Skins could get home field, but as bad as the NFC West is, Seattle could go 13-3 or 14-2 next year.[/QUOTE]

You don't think that they'll lose Hutchinson and Alexander?