Wayne "Won't Be opposite Moss"
 

[color=black]All of us that were hoping Reggie Wayne would be wearing the burgundy and gold next season will be highly disappointed...It appears that he indeed won't become a Redskin. The Colts made it clear Friday that Reggie would not be going anywhere. [/color]
[color=black][url="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/03/AR2006020302680.html"]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/03/AR2006020302680.html[/url] [/color]


[color=black]No T.O., no Reggie, what’s our next move.[/color]

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

Senorice.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

[color=black][font=Verdana]That's possible...He'll probably be a late 2nd round/early 3rd round pick, but I think the Redskins will be looking at a big physical receiver in the draft.

It would be great to have the Moss brothers running fly routes on each side of the field...something would have to give...lol[/font][/color]

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

santonio holmes is a slightly better santana clone, but senorice is more likely to have immediate impact due to being at miami and having a pro bowl brother... of course, unless we move up I doubt we'll be able to get him now. If we can settle the WR/DE thing in FA (very possible) I'd be much happier cause then the skins can use picks on needs that FA wont fix (OL depth, cheap DL depth/DT #2, cheap CB, possible upgrade on royal or clark, torp the moonshot punter). I'm really hoping for a boring draft full of real upgrades instead of chances (will stovall/nance be ready to help this year? will tapp develop enough to displace wynn, or is he just a slightly better backup than evans (an a short term waste)? We're just not picking high enough to upgrade certain spots with significant immediate impact).

people really seem to get hung up on the size thing... stovall and nance are big, but i think football ability and hands are much more important personally. Schotty picked gardner over moss because of the size thing and right now moss would get at least a 1st and 2nd in a trade (good contract, pro bowl 1500 yards etc) and gardner isn't worth a 7th.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

i say keep david patton as #2,AND REALLY GO AFTER A PASS RUSHING END

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]i say keep david patton as #2,AND REALLY GO AFTER A PASS RUSHING END[/QUOTE]
we can easily do both..

go after someone like kampman or brock and then givens in free agency.. then use our 2nd round pick for the best college DE still on the board. used the 3rd rounder for the best o lineman still on the board.. we would have a stellar off season

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

[QUOTE=shallyshal]we can easily do both..

go after someone like kampman or brock and then givens in free agency.. then use our 2nd round pick for the best college DE still on the board. used the 3rd rounder for the best o lineman still on the board.. we would have a stellar off season[/QUOTE]

I love David Givens. Other than Wayne, who appears to be off the market, I think he's the best WR available in free agency.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

[QUOTE=Schneed10]I love David Givens. Other than Wayne, who appears to be off the market, I think he's the best WR available in free agency.[/QUOTE]

I'll bet the Patriots do to David Givens what the Colts are doing with Wayne. Givens is the best wideout New England has, plus there's great chemistry between he and Brady. They'd be stupid to break up that tandem.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

Kiper has Senorice moving into the bottom of the first round now. We won't get a shot at him. I'm not so sure it would be a great idea anyway. I think, if the Skins are really gonna pursue a number 2 wide out, they need to look at a big, physical possession receiver.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

we knew we werent getting wayne, it was clear that indy was always going to take him back

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

d branch is the pats best WR, not givens.

I still don't think everyone should get hung up on size... production is more important (s smith at 5'8" still got 12+ tds). We can get size in a 6'6" TE which will have a couple shots at (maybe byrd, but probably klop (6'7" or tim day).

If spencer is there at 52 i'd really lobby for him though... mcclover will probably be around in the 3rd and he's MUCH faster than tapp etc.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

I hope the Skins make a run at either Kevin Curtis or Antwaan Randle-El. Both would be great additions. If Patten returns as the legitimate #2, then go hard after Randle-El as a slot man with the potential to be "Joe Gibbs creative".

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

Our best shot may be to go for a "project" WR in the late rounds of the draft. While i think WR is a priority I dont think we should just settle for whoever is left in FA.If Wayne was our guy and he is indeed staying in Indy, then we should concentrate on the draft now.

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

Give me Martin Nance, Hank Basket, or Maurice Stovall in the second and a good TE in FA and we are money. ONe of them has to be there

Re: Wayne "Won't Be a Redskin"
 

[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]Give me Martin Nance, Hank Basket, or Maurice Stovall in the second and a good TE in FA and we are money. ONe of them has to be there[/QUOTE]i really like stovall, nice choice