TO for LaVar?
 

I was just thinking about this trade the one day, I know it will probably never happen, but I wanted to get some feedback from people to see what they would think if the trade happened? I think our def. is nasty without Lavar, and our offense needs alot of help, especially at WR so I would be in favor for the trade.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

I think TO is a great receiver. However, him being a cancer pretty much goes without saying. So, I won't beat that to death, I'll just focus on why he wouldn't be happy here. There's only one football.

We would have to get Portis, Moss and TO enough touches to stay happy. That's if Cooley doesn't mind not getting the ball a lot or Patten can deal with moving back to 3. There's no QB on earth, except maybe Peyton or Tom Brady that could keep TO and Santana happy.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

Why must we re-hash the whole TO thing? Brothers and sisters it 'aint gonna happen:)

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

Wow, you combined a lot of things that we constantly talk about into one thread. At the risk of being a dick, we've basically beaten all those subjects into Elmer's.

WELCOME by the way.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

no way...why would you even say this

and arent you guys tired of lavar and T.O. threads yet?

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

[QUOTE=steveo395]no way...why would you even say this

and arent you guys tired of lavar and T.O. threads yet?[/QUOTE]

I'm tired of LaVar threads and TO threads by themselves, but a combined TO and LaVar thread is simply delicious. Yum, Yum!

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

that's the type of trade that might cause me to cease being a skins fan. T.O. = cancer. Any skill he brings to the table just isn't worth it. And it's no secret that I'm still a huge Lavar fan, so to trade my favorite NFL player for my least favorite?......well, let's just say I'm glad there is zero chance of it actually happening.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

With our cap situation it is not even remotely possible.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

just say no to T.O. by the way welcome!

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

are you kidding. one TO is 32 years old, a cancer to a team, and way too much money for a guy that old. He is a good receiver, but that doesn't matter we have our guy in Moss. we dont need anyone coming here thinking they are the guy. they have to understand I am the #2 guy or #3 guy.

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I'm tired of LaVar threads and TO threads by themselves, but a combined TO and LaVar thread is simply delicious. Yum, Yum![/QUOTE]

How about LaVar FOR TO and get TO to play quarterback because he's obviously better than Brunell?

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

[QUOTE=FRPLG]With our cap situation it is not even remotely possible.[/QUOTE]

I suppose you may have to update your sig now

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

malcolm,dont get offiss involved

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

Keep Lavar, get Abraham for Ramsey. Then make a run at Bryant spend the draft on a Tight end and line depth

Re: TO for LaVar?
 

It's as though the title of this thread was focus grouped to elicit the maximum response. No guns for deadbeat dads. The soccer moms will eat it up.