Andre Carter
 

Redskins just signed carter as reported on channel 7

Re: Andre Carter
 

good news, only if we play him at DE, which i anticipate we will...

Re: Andre Carter
 

great news

Re: Andre Carter
 

THE REDSKINS DID NOT SIGN ANDRE CARTER AS A LINEBACKER TO REPLACE LAVAR. YOU'D THINK THE PRESS WOULD BE SMARTER THAN THAT

[i]from Fox Sports[/i]
Carter would be the natural replacement for departed linebacker [url="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/player/70869"][color=#0000ff]LaVar Arrington[/color][/url]. The [url="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/team/67062"][color=#0000ff]Redskins[/color][/url] want to generate more of a pass rush, and Carter has 32 sacks over his five-year career with San Francisco. He had 12 1/2 in 2002 but only 6 1/2 over his last two years.

media people repeat after me
Carter is a DE
Carter is a DE
Carter is a DE
I AM A MEMBER OF THE PRESS AND I AM PUBLISHING THE WRONG INFO

Re: Andre Carter
 

The guy has 6.5 sacks over the last 2 years.............what'd we give him? 30 mil?

Re: Andre Carter
 

The Skins are apparently still pursuing John Abraham. If they land him, Carter will almost certainly move to LB.

Re: Andre Carter
 

why not put both of them at DE?

Re: Andre Carter
 

[QUOTE=Duffman003]why not put both of them at DE?[/QUOTE]
Daniels had a quality year for us. He is the starter and doesn't need replacing.

Re: Andre Carter
 

yeah but daniels had 4 sacks against a backup left tackle in one game. if you take out that game he only had 4 sacks over the entire season.

Re: Andre Carter
 

[QUOTE=mooby]yeah but daniels had 4 sacks against a backup left tackle in one game. if you take out that game he only had 4 sacks over the entire season.[/QUOTE]

But you cant do that. You have to look at the totals. There are always going to times when things come in clumps. It's called "clumped distribution" and it's the way things always happen in statistics. If you look at a lot of guys, you would see that they tend to dominate a certain guy during the season and that makes his numbers go up.

With Carter on one side and Daniels on the other, things could get really ugly for Bledsoe and Manning.

Re: Andre Carter
 

hurry up espn.com

Re: Andre Carter
 

If this is the guy they feel can help them, then I am psyched, because once again, the skins got their man despite the fact that another team (and one with sentimental pull--Denver) was in the mix.

Also, it's kinda tough to judge the numbers of anyone on SF--remember how we clobbered them? No one looked good that day, but I am sure there are good players there. I'm not a scout, so I'll trust he's got the qualities that Williams is after.

Re: Andre Carter
 

[QUOTE=81forHOF]The guy has 6.5 sacks over the last 2 years.............what'd we give him? 30 mil?[/QUOTE]

6.5 sacks as an LB in two years. as a DE he had 25.5 sacks in three years.

Re: Andre Carter
 

if we're still going after JA that's a huge mistake. that really would press on the money and possibly prevent getting the last three needs filled (CB/LB/OL) and cost us a draft pick.

vinny said they were almost done, so hopefully JA isn't in the plans.

Re: Andre Carter
 

[QUOTE=Big C]good news, only if we play him at DE, which i anticipate we will...[/QUOTE]

I disagree. The majority of his plays will be at DE but the more versatile players that GW has in his arsenal the better the defense will be. Williams has put together one of the best defenses in the league without a pass rush. That is an incredible feat. Having a great 'tweener is only going to make them more dynamic. If Taylor gets off, this D is going to be incredible.